Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/06/26/corporate-media-complicity-in-state-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-74407
Who Rules?--Merely Consider, Per Voltaire, Who Is Above Criticism
(Apollonian, 26 Jun 14)
--------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------------
The blame cannot be solely apportioned to Israel and Mossad. JFK had many adversaries, most of which were domestic.
Based on the work of Garrison, Jim Marrs, and Fletcher Prouty, Stone’s film, with the exception of some cinematic license, is entirely accurate. Stone was forced to suggest otherwise after tremendous pressure exerted by the US press.
This was in fact proven by the King family in a civil suit that was, in keeping with the theme, entirely overlooked by major media. At the time news outlets were giving inordinate attention to the O.J. SImpson trial.
See, for example, William Pepper’s overview of the episode.
Half tribal Oliver Stone’s movie about Garrison was both boring and possibly serving as subconscious disinformation. This essay paints Garrison in a more serious and sober light. I hadn’t thought too much about how decoys are often standard MO. I feel almost certain that the Mossad had JFK killed, though, so his writing resonates more on this generalized level. Garrison was a catholic; his metaphor ‘about wafer-thin deceptions being eagerly accepted one after another,’ like communion in the catholic mass, is brilliant. The artifice accompanying contemporary ‘assassinations’ really is almost transparent and yet the public consumes it unquestioningly like some faith experience. (I detest catholicism BTW).
Wasn’t MLK’s family was able to prove that he was the target of a government conspiracy to kill him…?