If Judaics Make Things Racial, Gentiles Are Forced To Accept The Conditions
(Apollonian, 28 Jul 10)
Christ was Galilean of Judean descent, as I understand--NOT "Jew," Jew nowadays understood as followers of Pharisees/Talmud, as I'm sure u urself acknowledge and actually profess, if I'm not mistaken fm reading ur texts. See below-copied fm RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, "Homeland Security....," comments. So Christ would be "Judean"--NOT "Jew."
I simply adopt Judaic enemy's own terms, so far as it's convenient, they thinking in such racial terms first and most of all. Thus opposed sides consist of the Jews (Pharisaics, or Judaics), as they understand themselves, along w. all their accomplices/cohorts, including such as the "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for expo/ref.) gentiles and the fringe Jews of race (even if not necessarily of explicit Talmudic religion) who are loyal to the Talmudist-Judaics. This terminology, and distinctions therein and thereof, seem so subject to needless complexity otherwise.
Such are exigencies of warfare, it's practical then to so speak Jew vs. gentile. The "good Jews" of race, who repudiate the rabbinic-Talmud, then become non-Jews, or practical gentiles.
Christ no doubt rather sympathized w. the Judean "people" who were not Pharisaic.
Obviously then the "Jews" (Judaics-Talmudists) see themselves as anti-gentile, though for practical purposes, they're also anti-Jew (of lower-sociologic level), as u seem to pt. out.
I don't see how u can fail to acknowledge the "irreconcilable racial classes" which the Judaics themselves insist upon. For if they make themselves enemies of us gentiles, it's simply then necessary exigency--and justice--of warfare to treat them in reciprocal fashion. If it's racial matter for them--why isn't it also for the victimized gentiles?
How are victimized gentiles rationally required to hold to a standard higher than their antagonists and enemies?--it's mere indulgence and conceit at best to a degree self-defeating and even suicidal.
I don't consider gentiles are at all required by Christian principles to pretend to such absurd and self-defeating standards by which Judaics-Talmudics are now allowed to hide within larger population of Jews, in order to more easily, conveniently victimize gentiles. Gentiles are perfectly entitled by the law of war to "KILL THEM ALL," letting the "Lord choose" the good ones, I submit--this is excellent rule of reason which Christ would readily acknowledge, I contend.
But don't doubt I fully understand ur distinctions--it's just the exigencies of warfare, hence politics, are such it's not too easy to be too fancy and conscientious for heeding to these distinctions. For the necessary generalizations, invidious as they so often tend to be during warfare, do not lend themselves to easy and convenient choices all the time in all situations.
So what it most generally comes down to is TRUTH vs. lies; Honesty vs. Deceit; Objectivity and determinism vs. Subjectivism and perfectly "free," God-like will. And the core elements of these two opposed sides are un-questionably racial for character, culture, race, psychology, and ideals.
So while ur distinctions u emphasize may technically be true; they're not necessarily practical for politics and warfare.
Note some modern Judaic-Talmudics pretend to distinguish btwn "zionists" and Talmudics who AREN'T so "zionist"--does this make Talmudic non-zionists better than the zionists?--I don't think so--do u?
CONCLUSION: So I don't think I was falsifying Christ insofar as he pt'd out the ultimate fallacy of the Judaic-Pharisaic war-program against gentiles. The basic racial-deterministic metaphor holds up well enough, I submit. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
----------------above by Ap in response to below-copied----------------
Michael Hoffman said...
To Anonymous 8:56 a.m. [See below-copied.]
Subjectivism Again Demonstrated As Essence Of Judaic Program/Culture/Mentality