* * * * *
Putrid Moralism Founded In False Premise Of HUBRISTIC "Free" Will, Subjectivism
(Apollonian, 7 Jun 10)
Well Chris: if u first make gross mistake of PRESUMING there is such thing as "good-evil"--then u shouldn't be toooooooo surprised, should u?--the most EXTREME subjectivists, most collectivistic subjectivists will contrive to hold themselves as MOST virtuous. See LibertarianToday.com, "Charles Krauthammer...," 7 Jun 10.
"Good" is mere function of SUBJECTIVISM, isn't it?
Jews then are ultimate SUBJECTIVISTS (see RevisionistHistory.org and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo)--this is fundamental premise to moralism-Pharisaism--subjectivism, by which one creates reality within one's mind--by which one lies to oneself. But note in subjectivist reality everything is both lies and truth at same time, isn't it?
I mean, after all, isn't that the very definition of PHARISAISM?--that putrid quality of self-righteousness?
So Chris, if u people there at Occidental Observer (all of u a bunch of moralist-Pharisaists, pretending there are "good" Jews) react to this Pharisaism with such (justified) repulsion--WILL U EVER BEGIN TO QUESTION UR PREMISE in first place?--regarding this "good-evil" fallacy/delusion/heresy (Pelagianism)?
A "disgrace" and "farce"?--really?--but isn't that mere logical conclusion and consequence to ur false Pelagianist premise (perfectly "free" will) in first place?
For the whole idea/notion of being "good" in first place is borne of that HUBRISTIC desire to being God (with perfectly "free" will), isn't it?
Thus the degenerate society in "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler, must culminate in horrific catastrophe brought about by most abject subjectivism, thus HUBRIS, thus purest insanity and psychopathology, of which Jews are leaders and topmost masters.
CONCLUSION: First Jews will kill excess, over-populated gentiles willing to be led by Jews, but then Jews, now over-populated themselves (relatively), will have to begin killing one another--such is obligatory course in necessary CYCLIC process. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
"Jews-Media" Attempts To Enlist Moralism-Pharisaism Against (Relatively) Honest Candidate, Paul
(Apollonian, 26 May 10)
I'd agree w. Chris Moore (see LibertarianToday.com, "Are the Lefties...," 25 May 10): this attempt by "Jews-media" (see http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/index.html) against Rand Paul will merely back-fire--which Jews-media has been losing ground and "market-share" for years and years now to mighty INTERNET--and we actually now see why in midst of this blatant attempt to intimidate candidates, people, and entire electoral process so heavily affected by Jews-media propaganda instrument, now fading for popular influence.
For USA was made by white Christians for white Christians--this then so ruthlessly destroyed by US Civil War and turned into a horrible, putrid Judaic empire, now dissolving rapidly in face of impending collapse of US Dollar.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 was simply a move to enslave whites at behest of detested and despised blacks descended fm slaves--and it's too bad people STILL can't figure it out--what happened?
Thus observe "Modern" era fm French Rev. is a gross, horrific irrationalist age founded in hubristic MORALISM-Pharisaism, inspired fm "romantics" led by J.J. Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, and Eng. Utilitarians.
Thus people are obsessed w. neo-Pelagianist hereticalism and "good-evil" fallacy/delusion, at least the third great wave, historically, fm original of St. Augustine and later Renaissance form denounced by St. Martin Luther.
But such moralism-Pharisaism is EXTREMELY DIFFICULT to eradicate because by means of it one is enabled to pretend to a Godly-type, perfectly "FREE" human will, which too many people, esp. the weak-minded, become addicted to and obsessed with. Such moralism-Pharisaism is simply, really just a kind of psycho-pathology which makes goons and enforcers out of middle-class -types to be used and manipulated by Jews.
Thus master-manipulators of such putrid irrationalist culture suffused w. such moralist-Pharisaist madness and hubris are always, always, always JEWS, master liars and subjectivists, who rule in practical form by means of COUNTERFEIT scam/fraud in way of present US Federal Reserve Bank (Fed)--see RealityZone.com and TheMoneyMasters.com.
Thus gentiles under sway of such moralism-Pharisaism lose cultural and racial cohesion in face of Jews who remain collectivistically organized--absolutely dominating poor, stupid gentiles who otherwise grossly out-number Jews. Judeo-Criminals RULE.
So Rand Paul's moment of idealist honesty and candor upon a minor pt. of a small issue was NOT AT ALL a "faux pas"--RATHER, it is simply an attempt by Jews-media to "spin" and smear a candidate they fear most intensely for Paul's well-known intention of removing the practical CRUX of oligarchal power--that COUNTERFEIT scam called the "Fed."
And evermore numerous people understand perfectly such smear attempt by Jews-media--by means of afore-mentioned mighty internet.
So now what's "Jews-media" practically trying to accomplish in near-term?--they want to pretend Rand Paul will now lose enough voter appeal so that polling will indicate a closer political race with the Democratic candidate--WHICH WILL THEN ENABLE VOTE-FRAUD by means of the "electronic voting" lurking in the background for American politics (see BlackBoxVoting.org and BlackBoxVoting.com).
And if Judeo-oligarchs cannot too expediently cheat Rand Paul by means of such vote-fraud, then oligarchs
will outrightly assassinate Paul by means of convenient "accident"--as happened to late Sen. Paul Wellstone of Minnesota.
CONCLUSION: Never doubt or forget basic problem of USA and West is CULTURAL, having to do with that putrid, hubristic Moralism-Pharisaism and irrationalism founded in mysticism-subjectivism, Jews natural masters of such putridity and CYCLIC "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler. Only ultimate cultural solution is JEW-EXPULSION, by which justified hatred of Jews and their sublime, infernal psychopathology unites all gentile people, white and non-white. Honest elections and death to the Fed.
Proper Issue Is Christian Truth, Hence Objectivity, Thus Determinism Vs. Jew Lies Founded Upon Subjectivism, Pretended "Free" Will
(Apollonian, 23 May 10)
Chris: like a Jew, u simply ignore the definition of racism which is VIRTUE of LOYALTY to people, ancestors, and culture as I noted for u, consistent w. 5th of original Ten Commandments, "Honor thy race" (parentage). See below-copied fm LibertarianToday.com, "Bigoted Rachel...," 22 May 10, comments.
And such loyalty (racism) is perfectly consistent w. Christianity which upholds TRUTH and honesty, racial loyalty a necessity of defense and security in this world of sin and warfare.
U next bring up a new issue in "free" will--which perfect "free" will belongs only to God, by definition, human will LIMITED and dependent upon circumstances, subject to that absolute DETERMINISM founded upon cause-effect which all science demonstrates and verifies.
If human will was capable of absolute freedom and, for example, a conclusion not founded upon, and limited by previous premises, then it would by definition be an agent of MIRACLES--which it isn't. Humans are NOT God, and cannot exercise a perfectly "free" will.
White race suffers CYCLIC HUBRIS of classical Greeks, humans pretending precisely to that presumptuous, perfect and godly-type "freedom" of will as u uphold, this within CYCLIC "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler. Thus white folk must regain that HONESTY and racialist spirit--dropping and rejecting the presumptuous hubris u espouse, pretending as u do to a perfectly "free" will--which does NOT exist.
Nazis attempted desperately and heroically to defend white Germanic folk against murdering, psychopathic Jew-bolsheviki -led hordes which had been organized and harnessed fm the HUBRISTIC moralism-Pharisaism proceeding fm J.J. Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, and Eng. Utilitarians. Nazis didn't kill white folk; rather, they tried to defend them.
And Christianity is the way of TRUTH, hence objective reality, designed unquestionably to oppose Pharisaist (Jew) lies founded in Talmudic subjectivism and pretended, hubristic, perfectly "free" will.
Thus all gentiles can co-exist, but on strictly racialist basis, USA founded by white Christians for white Christians, obviously. Non-whites will have to have their own governments and nation-states--which are obtainable upon strict "states' rights" basis.
CONCLUSION: Chris: the issue now btwn us is reduced to that of reason and determinism vs. mysticism and perfectly "free" will--or simply Christian objectivity vs. Talmudic subjectivism--it's u who champions Judaic subjectivism and perfectly "free" will by which u pretend to "good-evil" Pelagianist hereticalism. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
--------------------above by Ap in response to below-copied-------------
Chris Moore said...
Appolonian, it’s really not that difficult. Institutional racism = State-imposed racism, be it by taking my tax dollars and using them to implement an affirmative action regiment, impose race laws, or send them to a Jim Crow State like Israel, which then implicates me in its actions by way of my coerced financial support.
What you don’t seem to comprehend, Appolonian, is that libertarianism, which flows from Christianity, like Christianity, is race blind, thus by setting up false barriers above or between the races by imposing programs like these, the State is flouting and attempting to destroy both Christianity and Free Will libertarianism.
Ultimately, one must choose between racism and Christianity, just as one must choose between Communism and Christianity, because they are irreconcilable; but there is no need to choose between libertarianism and Christianity, because one is perfectly consistent with the other.
The white race is diminishing note merely because it is being attacked and eroded by Jewry and the Left (which has been the case at least since the days of early Bolshevism), it is diminishing because it’s lost its way from Free Will Christianity and degraded into money worship, State worship and white racial tribalism as an antithesis to Jew tribal racialism (Bolshevism/Zionism). Why, just look at how many whites Nazism (white racial tribalism) cost the world. And State-worshipping Communism, through its anti-Christianity. And post-Christian American money worship, through its reduction of existence to a ledger.
Whites will never get their integrity and confidence in the future back through antithesis or emulation of racist Jewry, which is what you seem to be sanctioning. That’s a recipe for demise into darkness , defensiveness, and the paranoid siege mentality, as it has been for Jewry. Christianity is designed to transcend Jewry, not negate it. It is impossible to ever permanently negate racial tribalism, vindictiveness, and cultivated institutional racism as epitomized by the program of organized Jewry. The best of humanity seeks instead to rise above them all and lead be example.
Being white myself, I'm partial to whites, but if the white race no longer has what it takes to bear the cross and instead devolves into another scheming, paranoid, beady-eyed, siege-mentality entity like Jewry, no doubt another will eventually take up the mantle. 6:38 PM
"Libertarian" Moralism-Pharisaism Fails To Serve Reality Once Again
(Apollonian, 22 May 10)
Well, u still haven't defined "institutional racism" and how it differs fm plain racism--which is VIRTUE of loyalty--as u can ck simply by consulting any dictionary. See below-copied fm LibertarianToday.com, "Bigoted Rachel...," 22 May 10, comments.
"Jew nationalists" ("zionist" or not) is redundancy--Jews are Talmudists by definition, loyal only to fellow Jews, and are at war w. Gentiles--such is Judaism: war against gentiles. Thus Jews are simply criminals who indeed and in fact dominate organized crime in USA--see Mike Collins Piper's "The New Jerusalem."
People of a "nation," properly understood, have every right to see to benefit and interest of their own people, hence race--this is obvious in all reason, hence proper libertarianism. It's no different for the family which inhabits a house to so see to their interests, the home then corresponding to nation, family corresponding to people of that nation--it's easy, obvious parallel.
So u see Chris, what's happening is u're just flopping about w. a contrived and elaborated moralist-Pharisaist (hence presumptuous and non-existent) ABSTRACTION once again, utterly dis-connected fm any concrete reality, living in ur "ivory-tower" theoretical dream-world, typical of "libertarian"-types.
CONCLUSION: People have a perfect right to be racist, seeing thus to their collective interests--this dialectic is just another example of pretended, fallacious, and grandiose "libertarian principles" conflicted w. reality, not serving any purpose but confusion--which mostly then just serves the Judeo-oligarchs, keeping gentiles in-fighting (as in this Rand Paul case) by means of false moralism at bottom of this contrived "racism" issue. Christian virtue of HONESTY is best policy. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
----------------above by Ap in response to below-copied-------------
Chris Moore said...
America for assimilated and assimilating Americans -- of all races. Jewish nationalists are not loyal Americans because their primary loyalty is to Israel and Jewish nationalist interests. They have no intention of assimilating. Mexico-first La Razans are a similar phenomenon, only loyal to the Mexican government and its interests.
An example of institutional racism is what Jewish Zionists in Israel impose upon non-Jews with U.S. taxpayer money. U.S. taxpayer money should never be used to impose instructional racism anywhere, including America, because it is un-American.
White nationalists who support institutional racism should start their own country elsewhere, just as Jewish nationalists who support institutional racism should move to Israel. 12:00 PM
Racism Is Virtue Of Loyalty, And Paul Should Only Be Supported For Tactical Expedience
(Apollonian, 22 May 10)
So Chris, what's "institutional racism"?--(another one of ur elaborated, needlessly complexified phrases, I'll note)--is that like China for the Chinese people?--makes sense to me. See LibertarianToday.com, "Bigoted Rachel...," 22 May 10. Is it like Saudi Arabia for Arabians?--makes sense to me. Russia for Russians?--why doesn't this make sense? What's wrong w. racism?--see, u're lacking a premise, I submit.
For in a determined (objective) reality, THERE IS NO "GOOD-EVIL" as there's no perfectly "free" human will. Everyone simply does one's best. So u need to explain (a) what u really mean by "racism," and (b) what's wrong w. it, if there's anything wrong.
For this is a "racist" world, comrade Chris--it's the way it was meant to be--it's fifth commandment of original Ten: "Honor thy race" (parentage). USA was made by "whites" for whites (whatever that means--for "white" is an abstraction which requires definition)--and this makes eminent sense.
But then we had the Civil War and destruction of USA and its Constitutional system and Republic built necessarily upon states' rights, and it's just taken a long, long time to die out--still in process as we speak, CYCLIC "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler.
Thus blacks--an enemy, alien race--were "en-franchised" by the victorious whites of the US north in order to spite the murdered and enslaved Southerners of the south who fought doggedly and had forthrightly killed so many masses of invading Yankee goons during the war.
Thus USA was made into the stinking, putrid, filthy Judaic-friendly and -oriented EMPIRE it is now, presently dying, about to enter HYPER-inflation stage and flame-out demise (we hope, anyway--Halliluyah)--good riddance.
Rand Paul is muddled and compromised no less than his senile, old father--even though both of these are far, far better than even worse Jew-sympathetic gentile scum who front and serve for the Judeo-empire-of-lies, USA.
So Chris, I submit ur "analysis" is muddled and over-elaborate, yet once again--even though, to be sure, u certainly make some excellent pt.s, without a doubt. Of course Jews are hypocrites--if they weren't, they wouldn't be Jews, would they?
But nonetheless, unfortunately, ur vision is caught-up, as usual, in murky details of a basically fallacious, moralistic-Pharisaist, delusionary, ABSTRACT world, u being utterly BLIND to real, CONCRETE world of racial virtue--virtuous, as it makes sense for HONEST folk who keep to CONCRETE simplicity.
Hence political solution and key is to UNITE the volk--all gentiles against an easily visible negative--anti-semitism, for direct purpose of JEW-EXPULSION. And there are no "good" Jews (Talmudists, never forget--see RevisionistHistory.org and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo) anymore than there are "good psychopaths."
Of course Jew-expulsion would and should, logically, include extermination of all those sympathetic to Jews, who actively support and defend Jews, like especially, Jews' most crucial allies, the "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for expo/ref.) hereticalists who say Christ was Jew (Talmudist) and support enemy terror-state of Israel which did 9-11 (see Bollyn.com).
Note then anti-semitism includes anti-zionism automatically, logically, and naturally. Corresponding philosophic tenets are Christian TRUTH founded in Aristotelian objectivity (hence determinism) vs. Talmudic subjectivism and delusionary, perfectly "free" will, "good-evil" Pelagianism, criminal lies and fraud, and statist collectivism.
CONCLUSION: Rand Paul should be supported by white, Christian, and gentile patriots on TACTICAL grounds only, with no illusions regarding Paul's cringing, disgusting subservience to Jews, Jews primary enemy of all mankind. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.c...-parkland.html
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Hoffman: The Mad Moralist, Ho Ho Ho
(Apollonian, 15 Feb 18)
(Apollonian, 15 Feb 18)
Hoffman writes, "In the long term it will require a moral revolution...." What?--"moral revolution"?--so what's "moral," Hoffman?--can u tell us?--is it just "good" = to "moral"? So then, what's "good"?--what's the definition?--what's the criterion that makes "good" what it is, distinct fm not-"good" or anything else?
And of course, Hoffman can't say what's "good" aside, no doubt, fm absurd circularities like "opposite of evil" (for what then is "evil"?)--he can't isolate any essence (for there is none). It's a lot like Hoffman is un-able to give a definitive source fm ancient texts for meaning of "usury," and he's too dis-honest to admit it.
For Hoffman won't admit simple truth: he cannot say what is "good"--for there is no such thing. And it's not coincidence that no one through entire hist. of philosophy has ever been able to definitively say what's "good" that applies in all instances.
For humans are necessarily creatures of will, though not perfectly "free," only God, by definition, having a perfectly free will. Thus humans can only do as they will, always following their will, and hence humans are necessarily self-interested, always have been, and always will be--necessarily--for such is their nature, creatures of will.
So what's "moral" if reality is determined, humans required by nature to follow their will--necessarily? How can humans be "moral," Hoffman, if anything they do is what they necessarily MUST do--as in the necessary following of will.
So "moral" only has real meaning as it is logical and rational, means always consistent w. ends, necessarily--though ends might be anything chosen by the subject.
For humans don't have to live if they don't want to, and if they want to live, they must heed to facts and truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6). So the greatest ethical virtue is consistency, logic, and reason, as those are only thing(s) compatible w. truth (= Christ) and capable of achieving end(s), the object of will.
And we see Hoffman makes "morality" into a kind of mysticism, not knowing or capable otherwise of saying what "morality" is--it's his IDOL (false God) which he pathetically pursues so pitiably, compulsively, mindlessly, always talking about it but never able to say what it is.
And it's this mystic, mindless obsession of Hoffman's regarding "morality" that makes him soooo satanically inclined w. hatred for humanity and sympathy for his Jew masters for whom he has such sympathetic connection, whom he serves so pathetically, always wordlessly begging them to acknowledge Hoffman's "moral" dedication--as if those Jew monsters of narcissist and obsessionate satanism and psychopathology would care about or acknowledge.
But that's ok, Hoffman, as u're PERFECT example of how NOT to be and precisely what to avoid, eh? Keep up ur great work, buddy, ho ho ho ho.