* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Jones Still Useful, Considering Jews Continue To Rule (For Practical Purposes)
(Apollonian, 20 May 14)
I've hardly hrd of "stratfor." Only objection I have to Jones is he does things right, I think, and he does good job of connecting dots, but then he fails to going all the way to naming the Jew. And this deliberate failure to name Jew is egregious and un-forgiveable, truly.
I've often thought of calling-in and asking Alex if he's satisfied he knows all he should know about Jews, Judaism, and Talmud, esp. the Talmud, though I'm sure he'd just come-back w. some lame excuse for them--like, "oh, not all Jews are religious and/or believe in the Talmud."
I'd say we'd KNOW Alex was deliberate scum if he came-out and embraced and pushed anti-Christ and anti-Christianity--though he's already doing that, indirectly, inasmuch as he defends and excuses Jews.
But I'd still say Jews have already practically WON--they rule, esp. for their monetary standard--that's why Jews own Alex and esp. Rand Paul now. My strategy then is to encourage one faction of Jews (and cohorts) to opposing the more established faction--like, for example, the Ron Paul faction to opposing the presently established and topmost neo-cons and CFR/Tri-lateralists/Bilderbergers.
If u note, way back when, like during 16th cent. the Jews encouraged the Protestants to opposing the Catholics, and that's when Jews actually started gaining legitimacy among Christians, a few achieving actual noble titles, I understand.
This story/blog article right here, Tim, I really do think is pretty obscure for lots of people--including me--seems like u're more nit-picking. I still listen to Alex every day and consider I gain useful info--against the more established Jews.
It's like the establishment Jews at top want to massively reduce population of gentiles, and Alex and his faction want to keeping gentiles around so Jews can continue to feed-off thereof. But as long as Alex is EFFECTIVE in opposing the ruling clique of topmost Jews (CFR, Tri-lateralists, et al.), then he's worth listening to for info, even if always remembering he's scum for defending Jews.
Like I say, Jews have WON--this isn't "defeatism" as u indicated; rather, it's realism, and I don't at all feel "defeated." Forces of Christ and truth must simply regroup as ZOG continues to move to inexorable defeat, long as we survive--it's like the original Christians prior to revolution of St. Constantine the Great.
/
May 20, 2014
Your excuses for Fatboy are tired, repetitive, and pathetic.
--------------------------------------------------
[Below, here was deleted by Fitz]
The Fatboy Has His Uses
(Apollonian, 20 May 14)
Tim, like I say--if Alex was to come-out and be anti-Christ, then there'd be no doubt, right?--but fatboy sincerely seems to think he's Christian--isn't that fair, accurate observation?--that's why he's so nice to Jews, eh?--evidently--he thinks it's good, Christian thing to so relate w. those poor, dear kikes--don't u observe there are lots of so-called "Christians" like that?
And note I NEVER have said Alex is any great, tremendous person--I'm ALWAYS careful and sure to note for folks he's far too Jew-friendly, and that this is not good by any means. But he gives out some good info, Tim, and good analysis too.
All I said, in my note, above, was this "stratfor" stuff was rather obscure, and that I was wondering what was specific pt (regarding stratfor).
So what are u saying, Tim--that Jews haven't won and control things?--why isn't that a good, worthy strategy?--to encourage one faction of Jews and Jewwies to oppose the dominant faction?--what else can be done?--what are u doing?--what's ur over-all analysis? How is it "pathetic" to being realistic, accurate for assessment, and practical?
/
May 20, 2014
By your logic, the National Review should be supported, despite it being a CIA front, simply because it puts out some good information and because it doesn’t overtly attack Christianity.
Doesn’t fly, Apollo.
Tim Continues To Fail For Clear Strategic Principles
(Apollonian, 20 May 14)
It (Nat. Review) might indeed be "supported," under certain conditions, w. provisions, if it was useful to doing so--it only depends upon circumstances, etc. Like I say, a good strategic consideration is that we're presently much like the original Christian revolutionaries prior to advent of St. Constantine--or perhaps during reign of Julian the Apostate, though I'd rather say prior to Constantine. Jews are on top, but their monetary system is tottering.
If u want to say what does and doesn't "fly," u need to provide premises for ur own strategy, such as it is. U don't like Jones; neither do I, but u don't want to give credit for the good info he does provide for folks. I still say Jones has his uses, limited though they may be, for patriots and Christians.
/
May 20, 2014
And you say I am not being clear. This rambling about Christian revolutionaries is irrelevant and makes little sense. If you can’t bother to read my articles and instead ask me to retell the points in them again for your ears, that’s your problem. I think the strategic uses for Jones are quite clear in
Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
[And if u ck, u'll see I actually did comment extensively on his above article, "Parallels....]
