new blogs

ck; also,

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Thomas Paine didn't fully appreciate/grasp Christian literature/philosophy, though he tried his best....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Paine Overlooked Full Literary/Philosophic Significance/Appreciation Of Dear Christianity
(Apollonian, 30 Nov 16)

Christianity (New Test.) ought best be understood as rationalist literary dialectic to preceding Pharisaic anti-thesis, esp. regarding "midrash" and "Oral Law Tradition" subjectivism, hence satanism. Thus New Test. and Christ restates and clarifies Old Test.

So Christianity, in New Test., presented a perfectly rational philosophy embedded within the story-line text which Paine failed to entirely grasp, but probably most accurately understood was mis-represented by so many false Christians to being merely a sort/version of the same old Pharisaic MYSTICISM/subjectivism.

So Paine was quite justified to denouncing mysticism, including the Christian-styled sort. And his argument is quite good, far as it goes.

For in reason and logic, one cannot prove a universal negative, that there is no God.

Hence the great achievement of Christianity, beginning w. the literature (New Test.) is (a) it demonstrates the Godly quality of TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), worthy of worship, the greatest value and virtue, this (b) against satanism and lies, in general (JOHN 8:44), and (c) specifically singling out and identifying Jews ("Jew" defined as followers of Pharisees/Talmud, distinct fm Judean, an error made by the author of this article) as foremost satanists, demonstrated by history and reality. (d) Dear Christianity further demonstrates a rational, practical, understandable ETHIC, following in perfect reason, by which to live and conduct one's life, far superior to the perpetual warfare and enmity of humanity of Pharisaism.

So in his striving to be rational and properly respectful of TRUTH, Paine actually follows Christian ideal and ethic; Paine just doesn't fully understand the Christian literary and philosophic dialectic as regarding Pharisaism, satanism, and objective nature of reality.

Mystic special pleading, in guise of "philosophy" (esp. Platonist), is massive for reification of non-existent "good"....

Below-copied essay by ap first published at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Christian Worships TRUTH (= Christ) In Accord W. Holy Spirit (Reason, Honesty, Integrity)
(Apollonian, 29 Nov 16)

U say, above:

"To put it slightly differently, just as knowing that truth *exists* is one thing, but finding out what propositions are true is something else, so too, knowing that good exists is not the same thing as being correct about what things are good."

TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) exists given the ASSUMPTION (as all logic is necessarily founded) of objective (Aristotelian) reality. Particulars are then mere subsets, including non-existent, particular (even if abstract) "good-evil."

Subjectivism, never forget, is just another (the alternative) assumption which one can choose, but question is what practical good does it do? For subjectivism only fails by reduction-ad-absurdum, that's all, and that's why objectivity is more useful, practical choice.

Subjectivism is necessary premise to satanism and "good," "good" mere instrument of satanism--it's reason, for another example, Alex Jones ( is heavily promoted by Jews, satanists, including hitlery Clinton, Jones notorious pusher of such "good-evil" fallacy/heresy (Pelagianism).

And all u do for "good" is, like typical Platonist, begging question repetitively, obsessively, continuously--as if to thus make such begging-question seemingly legitimate. Good is necessarily a particular, if it exists, which must be demonstrated and properly defined (regardless what u say about "definition") which we see u're incapable of doing.

Thus we see u continue to wiggle and squirm, begging the question, and special-pleading etc., for ur obsession for "good" (and hence "evil"), almost as if u want to reify this non-existent "good" by means of repetitively asserting it exists, even as u practically admit it can't be defined (and despite cavilling over meaning/use of the word, "definition").

So if "good" exists, given it's wide usage, it deserves a fairly simple, practical definition, "good" being mere PARTICULAR, though perhaps abstract, which neither u nor anyone else can do, period; admit the truth like proper Christian.

----------------above by ap in response to below-copied----------------------

Liberty Bell November 29, 2016 at 12:59 PM

Remember that there is a difference between metaphysics (the study of being or existence) and epistemology (the study of how we know). We should not confuse the two. A thing's metaphysical status is one thing; it's epistemic status is another.

The good and the true are an analogous positions, both with respect to metaphysics and epistemology. To put it slightly differently, just as knowing that truth *exists* is one thing, but finding out what propositions are true is something else, so too, knowing that good exists is not the same thing as being correct about what things are good.

I deny that any of the examples of moral confusion that you gesture towards - self-hatred, slavery, prohibition, seat-belt laws, fiat-money creation, and so on - are clearcut reasons to deny the existence of goodness. They give no better reason to deny the existence of goodness than they do to deny the existence of truth. After all, someone could say that the confusions that you highlight are primarily confusions over truth and over derivatively confusions over goodness.

But, presumably, you would want to say that racial self-hatred is not good and that it is true that one should not have racial self-hatred. And so on for each example.

For sure, your examples show that it is often difficult to come to know what propositions are true and what acts are good. And it is often contentious to advocate in favor of particular propositions or of particular acts. However, again, to draw metaphysical confusions from this epistemic quagmire just conflates metaphysics with epistemology.

Thursday, November 24, 2016

ZOG CANNOT allow Trump to taking office, suckers (a), and (b) ZOG MUST take-out I-net....

Why/How Trump Fails, Poor Stupid, Utterly Compromised Bastard
(Apollonian, 24 Nov 16)

Signs are very ominous ZOG WILL NOT allow Trump to take office. (a) Observe the ZOG maintains its imperialist impetus, including the propaganda, including the warfare, as in Syria, Turkey building a 2nd base in Syria: Then there's "pizza-gate." And the pt. is ZOG cannot allow Trump to take office, which now can ONLY be allowed to be occupied by one of ZOG's trust-worthy, dependable little puppets.

(b) Most of all, ZOG MUST remove the I-net which by itself is closing-in on too much truth for ZOG's purposes.

(c) Note how Trump is DESPERATELY trying to placate ZOG, promising to not prosecute hitlery, talking about putting in Romney as Sec. State. For Trump KNOWS he's still got to get past the Electoral College, and remember ZOG controlling trillions to be printed-up by US Federal Reserve Bank (see for expo on "fed") as necessary has their people at the ready.

The people urgently need UNIFICATION, direction, leadership, and this can be done, but Trump, the poor fool, led astray by his kike buddies, to whom he's sold his soul, will not allow it--which is invoking the Christian anti-satanic ideal and principle, Christ standing for TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) against Jew/satanic lies.

SO IF TRUMP CAN'T DO IT (this Christian unification on anti-satanic principle), then someone else must. This anti-satanic (hence Christian) unification will happen sometime as it's inevitable, only question is when and how many stupid, brainless scum, puke, and filth must die fm among the people. Remember lots of otherwise "good" folks will perish too.

So if there are any of u stupid bastards out there who can read and unnastan', I suggest u brainless scum start getting a clue to saving ur scummy lives, speaking the simple truth about Christ = truth, and the satanists/Jews are exposed and freaking-out, presently, willing and capable of killing lots of u dumb, brainless puke, called "the people."

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Regardless all the abstract distractions, note Pelagianism, "good-evil" heresy, fallacy, has serious, distinct, practical, down-to-earth problems, consequences....

Below-copied essay by ap first published at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"Good-Evil" Heresy (Pelagianism) Has Serious Implications, Consequences
(Apollonian, 22 Nov 16)

Hmmmmmmmmm, well, after reading through all ur text here, we see u still don't say what's criterion for this mythical "good-evil," but u seem to insist nonetheless that it's "good" and/or virtuous to believe in, or defend such "good-evil" notion or imagination, whatever it might be. Isn't this classic question-begging?

And think about this: what's a good dog?--a nice, good doggie-dog is one that's well-trained and obedient, right?--it does just what we want and expect, and we're sooooooo happy. And a bad dog is one not obedient and which fails to act in accord w. our wishes, right?--it's so doggone disappointing then. Doesn't same go for humans? When I was small, I remember how desperate I felt to be thought of as "good," ho ho ho ho.

And don't doubt there are practical, serious considerations for our subject-matter here, including the purpose of dear Christianity--combatting satanism which is extreme subjectivism.

Seems to me u rather fail for the practical consideration of this satanic problem--what's the source and motivation?--don't we see it most actively in our faces?--ever hrd of George Soros? Have u hrd of the "pizza-gate" child-trafficking of the Podesta bros.?--Agenda-21 genocide and "de-population"? Do u think Trump is in serious danger of assassination at hands of these absolutely psychopathic satanists?

And doesn't reason and rationality have to do w. REALITY? So I think I've faced, handled, and answered the pertinent issues in most practical manner, w. sufficient and not excessive ref. to abstractness--which abstractness, I submit, u rather seem to indulge in as something of an escape fm our issue, the reality, use, and application of "good-evil" myth, fallacy, and heresy. But of course, correct me if I'm wrong--give a clear, demonstrable criterion for such "good-evil" if u can, which no one in all history has ever done.

Thus the "freedom" of human will seems quite limited to resolution of emotions w. events of reality and then w. emotions of other humans who are our neighbors, family, and fellow-citizens. Thus we try to predict and calculate events and manage emotions based upon those predictions of ours. Thus there's successful management and incompetent management of such emotions, we valuing success ("pleasure") and seeking to avoid the bad management ("pain")--my philosophy is oriented towards such proper management and understanding.

Virtuous (or "good," but only in metaphoric sense) management then requires acknowledging the dis-utility (as "Austrian" economists would put it) of the childish "good-evil," despite its devilish attractions, esp. for political and psychologic manipulations. "Good-evil" is merely an attractive but dangerous metaphor--dangerous as it too easily is taken too seriously and then mis-used.

And honesty of Christian Holy Spirit requires admitting the truth regarding non-existence of any "good-evil"--it's mere metaphor at best w. no actual referent in reality, even if a lot of childish people want to insist upon it. And when such childish, hubristic people become too over-populated bad things happen as we see presently in "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler, imminent removal of US Dollar as world reserve currency, hyper-inflation, etc.

Sunday, November 20, 2016

"Good-evil" is mere fiction to control children, "ethical" just means logic btwn means, ends....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

What's "Good" Would Depend Upon What's Real, Hence Objective
(Apollonian, 20 Nov 16)

Good thing there are so many blogs on Socrates/Plato. "Socrates believed that nobody willingly chooses to do wrong[1]."

And the footnote [1] is: "[1] Read Plato’s Gorgias." So the quote evidently comes fm Platonic "Gorgias" Dialogue.

So to make sense of any of this about sin, we must realize that as reality must be objective (otherwise anything goes, in subjectivism), it's determined according to strict cause-effect (God's will). So there's no "good-evil," no perfectly "free" human will. "Sin" makes no sense except as dis-obedience, this applied to children to keeping them obedient, thus safe.

And "ethics" is simply logic btwn ends and means.

But since most people have difficulty w. logic and reason, they seek to follow leadership in the parental manner; this was especially true in olden days of yore.

So politically, it's most expedient and wise to follow the law, and to seem to people generally to being one who follows the law. And strictly speaking, ethics is actually an application of logic to choice (or observance) of means in respect to ends.

Regarding Christianity, remember it's necessary to cite a relevant passage fm Christ/Gospels who/which basically tells us to treat others as we'd want to be treated. It's wisest and best to keep everyone else thinking and knowing, much as possible, that we're reasonably looking out for their welfare as we want them to see to ours, etc.

Regarding the statement, fm above, "[o]ur will is capable of transcending our desires...," this doesn't really make sense: will is desire, by definition. And ultimately we must do as we will, it being impossible, indeed inhuman, not to so follow our will/desire.

Simplest precept to remember is the necessarily objective reality (subjectivism is absurd) is DETERMINED (absolute cause-effect); there's no "good-evil," no perfectly "free" human will, such absolute freedom reserved only for God.

Occam's razor is best ethics; simplest, easiest is best; objectivity = determinism. Sin is just dis-obedience which isn't necessarily wrong; it's mere tool by which to control children/most people.

Genius, true greatness, sublime perfection of New Test. cannot be surpassed, denied....

Below-copied essay by ap first published at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Genius, Perfection Of New Test.
(Apollonian, 20 Nov 16)

Note one great thing, among any others, about New Test. is it addresses an extremely significant philosophic/metaphysical problem which had been exploited by the Pharisees and their "Oral Tradition" "midrash"--SUBJECTIVISM, leading to satanism, noted by Christ, esp. at Gosp. JOHN 8:44 and other places too, as Gosp. MARK ch. 7, and MATT ch. 15.

Thus Christ so much and definitively affirms Aristotle and the objective reality in the Old Test. terms the Judean (NOT just "Jew") people, hence later the gentiles too, could understand. Thus we literally have philosophy--but taught in terms of literary story lines and DIALECTIC, using the Pharisees for the satanic anti-thesis.

Culmination of the New Test. drama is the triumph of Easter resurrection of truth (= Christ) WHICH CANNOT BE KILLED, no matter the satanic machinations of even the Pharisees, foremost satanists and liars. For the objective reality exists, PERIOD (necessary metaphysical assumption), such is the fundamental Christian truth and lesson, etc.

It's thus so sad and tragic this Christian lesson for the objective reality is so pathetically and miserably lost for all the so-called "Christians" of this day.

And then, given this (Aristotelian) metaphysical foundation, all ethics (and politics) follows which Christ demonstrates.

For note historically, there's serious implications for the great Christian vs. satanist/Pharisaic dialectic. For truly as humans are sinners, human life is war, as affirmed by Homer, Heraclitus ("War is general, and justice is strife...") Plato, and then later Machiavelli, Hobbes, Darwin, Spencer, Nietzsche, et al.

And Pharisees had brilliantly defined and developed a great war-God who truly served the Pharisaic purposes--which Christ rightly and brilliantly criticized and exposed, by means of reason and Holy Spirit. Life isn't all warfare.

Thus Christ/Christianity was/is great affirmation of Greek-rationalist (hence objective) principle against the Pharisaic-subjectivist, which extreme subjectivism inevitably degenerates into purest satanism, Pharisees and Jews being masters as their satanism is most sublimely practical, gentile satanists being too individualist, nihilist, too susceptible to degeneration to outright psychosis, dis-organization and dis-integration. Jews are collectivist and highly organized, always emerging to rulership and overall mastery--as we see today, Jews the masters of that foremost central-banking criminal enterprise, legalized counterfeiting, the pinnacle operation of organized crime which rules everything else.

Such then is the power of Christian literature and aesthetic, vehicle of the philosophy and lesson thereof. satanists thus attack the literary vehicle in hope of under-cutting the basic, necessarily preceding philosophy. And discussion of the literature is actually sublime, fitting, and convenient prelude and setting to the actual philosophy which is necessarily purpose of the literature. For New Test. literature was dialectic completion/perfection of Old Test., and now only question is WHAT was basic subject-matter of that dialectic which preceded even New Test.

When then we look at the other attempts at dialectic, the (Babylonian) Talmud and the Muslim Koran, we see the great virtue, integrity, and perfection of New Test. Amen.

Friday, November 18, 2016

satanists, Pharisaics, Jews always attack truth (= Christ) anyway they can, thus they attack the literature....

Below-copied essay by ap first published at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Which Came First?--Philosophy Or Literature?
(Apollonian, 19 Nov 16)

Ho ho ho--the "word of God"?--really?--so what's NOT the "word of God"? God, by definition, created everything, right? So everything that happens and is said is the product and word of God, right? Ho ho ho ho ho

But what we're really trying to talking about, I presume, is a definitive philosophy--and how complicated can it be? For it, this philosophy, must be "relevant," or pertinent, or significant for us, the people.

And we know the precursor of New Test., the Old Test., which strove to present a philosophy. Thus as religion presents and features an aesthetic, Christianity is a literary religion, like the Old Test. before it. Hence we have a dialectic, thesis and anti-thesis, Christ restating and clarifying things fm Old Test. in definitive manner, his main (philosophic) opponents being the Pharisees who later wrote the Talmud.

Thus Christ presents a (basic) philosophy and then defines therefrom an ethical principle/method so profoundly rationalistic that satanists (extreme subjectivists) and mystics have hated it ever since.

Thus Christ reassures us of the existence of truth (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) which exists necessarily and logically as product of an objective (Aristotelian) reality, God-given and -created for Christians and all humans.

Such then is the place and purpose of New Test., vehicle of the philosophy, the simplicity and efficacy of which is sooooooooo frustrating for satanists and Pharisaics.

So it's good to see the latest lies, written by the latest Pharisaics and satanists, are analyzed for fullest context once again in this article--it's much a question of chicken and egg--which came first, the philosophy or the literature? What now is the philosophy?--the satanists and Pharisees don't want the people to know, so they slander the literature.

Note satanic war is NOT letting-up, despite Trump's election, And Trump actually has great weakness against these satanic (hence Jew) filth....

In The Satanic (Jew) Assault, Trump Goes Along, Worrying Only About Israel
(Apollonian, 18 Nov 16)

Observe satanists, hence Jews, are doubling-down, and not receding or conceding diddly to Trump--who seems to be looking to doing everything for Israel first. So first, note Trump and Jew buddies fail for not calling the satanists what they are, satanists--this keeps the Jews covered, u see. For as soon as one identifies satanists, Jews are un-covered and exposed thereby.

Second, note the battle-cry for satanists and their flunkies--racism racism racism racism--it never stops, ho ho ho ho ho. Thus satanists work to throw the dumb brainless ****s--"the people"--on the defense, and it works soooo well, doesn't it? But note racism is virtue of 5th of original Ten Commandments, "honor thy parentage (race)," and further some kind of racism (loyalty) is axiomatic and obligatory, isn't it?--one can't get away fm it--one MUST be loyal to some race of some kind.

So the racism--or loyalty ideal--of the satanists is necessarily and evidently that of total rape and bastardization of all the races. And of course, the race the satanists (Jews) want to destroy most is the white race of Christians and Christianity, obviously. Whites and Christians are the obvious targets. Get a clue, morons. Perhaps someone needs to start speaking-up and -out.

And don't doubt TRUMP IS IN WITH THIS satanic program, and he will ROLL-OVER for them--how do u know?--because his closest advisors are the kikes, including Israel. Trump's kids, two of them, are married to these filthy Jew monsters, and one of these kikes, married to Trump's daughter, goes about loudly pushing holohoax lies.

So the dumb, brainless scum--the "people"--of Jew S A had better start to trying to begin to getting something going by way of substantial counter-play, and the way to doing this is EXPOSING THE KIKES, stupid!--call these scummy puke what they are--satanists, and pt. out how it's all designed to benefit Israel, and Trump is their flunkey.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Poor Hoffman, a mystic who can't figure-out Christianity is all about TRUTH, TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH (= Christ)....

Below-copied by ap first submitted, not (yet) published at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hoffman Yearns For National Audience, But Why?
(Apollonian, 15 Nov 16)

Yes Hoffman: I have to agree w. "Ted," above at 5:37 pm (see above citation). U ought to ck the Christian PHILOSOPHY at Gosp. JOHN 14:6: Christ is TRUTH, the only way to Godly happiness. Thus Christianity is an instrument of reason and Holy Spirit, including especially HONESTY. Now in Trump vs. hitlery, it was good-Jew (Trump) vs. bad ("globalist") Jew, hitlery--we still get Jews and their satanism/subjectivism. Trump merely gives a slight reprieve, Trump explicitly rejecting globalism.

Evidently, the "good" Jews want to keep goyim around to continue working and slaving for Jews, whereas the "bad Jews" continue to work for Agenda-21 genocide. So the "good" Jews saw a way of taking-over leadership of goyim which leadership may now last a little while.

Problem w. u, Hoffman, is u're MYSTIC and hereticalist Pelagianist, pretending to "good-evil" subjectivism, which doesn't exist in this God-created objective reality in accord w. ABSOLUTE cause-effect.

U want a "national audience/market"?--u already have one, buddy, but it shouldn't be too extensive to really making too much money for u, as u say same old stuff, don't u?--mysticism and Pelagian moralism.

For the true Christian cause is only forwarded by means of the objective reality, hence reason, primary component of Holy Spirit, along w. honesty, objectivity being only basis for TRUTH (= Christ). But objective reality bothers u, doesn't it?--because u want to preserve hereticalist "good" vs. "evil" which only exists in subjectivism which subjectivism is what Jews and satanists feature and worship.

Sunday, November 6, 2016

Heck, pain, agony: natural, necessary consequences of not heeding objective reality, God-given....

Below-copied essay by ap first published at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Heck: Natural, Necessary Result, Pain, Agony, Consequence Of Rejection Of Reality, Truth
(Apollonian, 7 Nov 16)

FM footnote 5: "Rather, hell is better understood as a complement to human freedom – in the sense that is “completes” human freedom. God does not eradicate those who reject Him. He sustains them in existence and thereby “honors” their request to be apart from Him. It’s simply that being apart from God is not at all nice, objectively, since God is the source of all good things."

"Human freedom"?--is non-existent except within the mind regarding truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), specifically btwn truth and lies (JOHN 8:44). For to accept God the Father, creator of the OBJECTIVE reality requires then rejection of satanic (extreme) subjectivism whence reality is mere emanation of one's own consciousness/mentality, making oneself God.

The Jews then are most practical and successful satanists as they feature a COLLECTIVE subjectivism, ruled by rabbis at the top (see Thus Jews are able to remain relatively clear-headed and down-to-earth for their conspiracies, plots, and criminal enterprises, no matter how far-flung, esp. regarding the top and master criminal enterprise, central-banking (see for expo) which funds and co-ordinates all other organized crime and even much of the un-organized criminal activity.

In contrast, the gentiles, due to cultural circumstances, have relative psychologic difficulty taking such subjectivism/satanism too seriously as they're so impractical, relatively egoistic, hence nihilistically dis-connected and esp. un-organized relative to Jews who are far more practical and highly organized, beginning in history w. the "FREE-MASONS," the original entry-point of Jew infiltration within gentile society, even before French Revolution, the masonic activity actually presaging and making way for the central-banking and revolutionary activity of 19th cent. and following.

And since heeding to objective reality is necessary for human life and activity, naturally ignorance and contempt for that reality will bring pain and agony--hell, including "hell on earth."

And of course, original pretext for satanism, even in all the irony, is the teaching of fallacious, delusionary, and hereticalist (Pelagianism), yet still quite effective, "good-evil" to the children by way of controlling the population, inducing guilt/inferiority -complex, most people failing for ever arising fm such childhood fallacies/delusions as "good-evil," founded totally upon subjectivism, "good" really meaning merely OBEDIENT, etc.

Note then the next step, psychologically, is the corruption of the word/concept "faith" fm proper LOYALTY, now to beleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevin'. For note heeding the objective reality doesn't at all require any beleeeeeeeeeeeving; one merely observes and respects one's observation of God's reality.

But note the subjectivist reality absolutely requires beleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevin'--even against one's perceptions, common-sense, and reason. And that's why the fallacious and actually foreign concept of "faith" as beleeeeeeeevin' is a Pharisaic intrusion upon Greek and Western culture/psychology. Thus note the supreme satanism of beleeeeeeeeeeving in lies, against truth, is counted to being "good." Heeding to truth and objective reality, even against such beleeeeeevin', is "racist" and "evil."

So one easily sees the nature and necessity of the hell of pain and agony which is naturally induced and rendered by means of the satanic/subjectivist ignoring of God-given objective reality and truth (= Christ) thereof. For human "freedom" is extremely limited, entirely to human conception, and reality itself cannot be changed by human will, only the human concept of reality, purely an internal affair of humanity.

Friday, November 4, 2016

satanism/Jews take advantage of psychos and children who want both "good," built necessarily upon subjectivism, and rule-of-law which cannot abide such subjectivism....

Below-copied essay by ap first published at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rule-Of-Law Cannot Abide Subjectivism/Satanism
(Apollonian, 4 Nov 16)

Anonymous Nov 3, 2016, 10:42:00 PM

"...[W]hat is important is for it to be toward what is good." -Mr. Goody

Don't u see how u just keep presuming?--what is "good"?--and WHY is that "good"? For in truth there isn't and couldn't be "good" in an objective, hence determined reality of absolute cause-effect, there being no perfectly "free" human will, humans deterministically seeking their interest (ultimately heaven), humans sinners, as St. Paul affirms.

And what is it to be "saved"?--we're obviously trying to save our republic of (a) freedom and (b) prosperity, both of which are built upon rule-of-law, republic going down the drain of satanism, satanism being extreme subjectivism, as urs, built upon fallacious, delusionary (and hereticalist) "good-evil."

For there's fatal contradiction btwn rule-of-law and ur satanic "good-evil," "good-evil" being pretext of subjectivism which subjectivism u deny yet practice and uphold insisting as u do upon child's "good-evil," hence inferiority/guilt -complex.

Subjectivism (hence "good-evil") cannot sustain rule-of-law, in fact, actually undercuts and destroys it.

And traitor as u are, aside fm being subjectivist/satanist, u insist upon saving, protecting, and up-holding satanism and foremost practitioners thereof, Jews and queers.

And u won't admit to treason as u're psychotic, insisting upon two conflicting, opposite principles, "good-evil," and rule-of-law. U don't seem to grasp "good-evil" is necessarily built upon subjectivism which u deny u uphold. U're psycho, psychotic, anti-Christ, SIGNIFICANT part of the problem.

-----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------

Anonymous Nov 3, 2016, 10:42:00 PM


hopefully whatever it is it will be worthwhile -

in any case it isn't that important for Mike to run it - what is important is for it to be toward what is good.

Obviously Mike cannot advertise that weather modification is going on so he probably won't be able to run the next one. But that's OK.

The bigger question really is what are we all trying to save? That is the real struggle - if something is not worth saving...


Thursday, November 3, 2016

satanists are not much impressed, scared, intimidated by FBI re-opening "investigation" on hitlery, etc....

satanists Continue To Plow Ahead For 2016 Election
(Apollonian 3 Nov 16)

Notice the satanists and hitlery barely flinch fm the re-opened FBI investigation of hitlery Clinton e-mail/foundation scandal--why?--because the entire election effort is mere exercise in fraud and psychologic manipulation. Only small minorities on extreme ends of political spectrum are substantially informed or too seriously motivated, the mass of morons, goons, and suckers in the "middle" of political spectrum moved merely by fear and/or fashion. To be sure, lots of people are impressed w. the gross criminality of hitlery. But note also how the stupid puke in the "middle" are still so impressed w., intimidated by the queers.

And what's Trump's position?--he's in w. Jews, his greatest weakness, but he emphasizes he's not the criminal like hitlery obviously is. Trump is rather successful businessman who employs folks and pays taxes. Too bad Trump hasn't emphasized the satanic nature of hitlery and the movement she fronts, including then the basic nature of satanism which is extreme subjectivism.

So the satanists simply continue w. the fraud effort as so few are impressed or worried about the election integrity. And the Jews-media is integral part of this election fraud, seeing to the psychologic manipulation of the people, keeping the people receptive to the fraud, to the plausibility of hitlery being righteously elected, no less than the queers are plausible humans, citizens, etc.

So I suspect the "election," such as it is, is left in hands of criminals and the sort of arbiters as we have here in Tx. who don't seem to have done much for elections, for if they see fraud, which has happened, then they should make definite moves, but perhaps they don't if they think it's not substantial, massive enough fraud, or perhaps they're confident in their own frauds being in the necessary positions. In any case, hitlery and the other satanists don't seem too terribly worried.

Satanism/satanists, like Jews, are happy long as they're not direct subjects of attn.