* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Nigel Pretends He Doesn't Understand Jew's Place In Conspiracy
(Apollonian, 9 Oct 14)
Nigel (see below-copied): u know, u almost begin to actually saying something of substance about things, eh?
Sure Jews are to blame; after all, they're scum, but there's more to it--it's not like Jews are to blame ALL BY THEMSELVES.
But if u only ck to see for urself, u see Jews own & control the mass-Jews-media, and they heavily control the legalized COUNTERFEITING scam called US Federal Reserve Bank, along w. all the other central banks, etc.--JEWS ARE MASTER-MINDS who much control, integrate, and connect the large criminal conspiracy composed then of all the various gentiles, like u, nigel.
Eliminating Jews then would much cut head off the snake, the rest of the criminal network losing organization, unity, integration, more easily mopped-up w. the Jew leadership eliminated--much like communists.
Regarding New Test., which u obviously know so little about, basic story is Christ clarified and re-stated law of Moses, and he did this AGAINST the Pharisees who, Christ said, WERE LIARS and had diverged fm Torah w. their "Traditions," later fully written-out as present-day Talmud. Pharisees responded by killing Christ as they work to kill truth itself, etc.
So u see, u really have no complaint: Jews truly are germane to the proper discussion despite ur Jew-friendly, Jew-serving objections, and there are good reasons for noting this Jew involvement, as for how Jews and their collaborators, like u, nigel, work.
-------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------------------
Nigel KnealeOctober 9, 2014 at 11:43 AM
Hmmm, yes, but the problem I seem to be having is that whenever I listen to a broadcast and feel the need to join a related discussion, the conversation seems to have somehow already reverted to something around the conviction that Jews are to blame.
Though while we're on the topic, incidentally,
it's certainly food for thought to consider the Talmud teaching that Jesus was the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier called Panthera, and the bastard son of an adulteress. I can see the attraction in this version of events. Jesus as an Italian certainly fits better with his sketchy character outlined in the Gospels.
I also don't see what's offensive in the Talmud's idea that Mary was a hairdresser. Hairdressing is a perfectly respectful profession, if you ask me. After all, if we accept the Gospel writers' character portrait, the mother of Jesus was a bit of an old good-for-nothing layabout.
It all makes for very interesting discussion anyway, doesn't it?