new blogs

ck satanismRampant.BlogSpot.com; also, ChristianMilitarization.BlogSpot.com

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Priceless dialectic w. precious kike, ho ho ho ho ho....


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Jews: Too Clever By Half, Ho Ho Ho
(Apollonian, 5 Aug 14)

That's it, kike--play stupid, right?  See below-copied by "Joan Edwards."

(a) Chertoff dual citizen kike was in charge of investigation; he let the Jew MOSSAD agents go back to Israel, and saw to destruction of rubble evidence.

(b) Who was in charge of security--both at WTC and airports?--Jews, "Kroll" and "Huntleigh" security.

(c) Who sabotaged the computers for ATC and FAA, the MOSSAD front co., Ptech.

(d) How did the MOSSAD agents know there'd be hits on WTC towers, their cameras set-up before-hand? And when these little kike shits went back to Israel (set free by Jew Chertoff) they admitted they were there to "document the event."

(e) And who was in charge of the litigation for lawsuits brought by family-members?--Jews, Mukasey and Hellerstein.

(f) Who was appointed director of the investigating 9/11 commission?--Jew Zellikov, close crony to Congolezza Rice, eh?

(g) Who owned the WTC bldgs. and even admitted to "pulling" Bldg 7?--Jew, Silverstein.

(h) Who were members of the Port Authority who sold the WTC bldgs. to their fellow kike, Silverstein?--more Jews. Ck Bollyn's book, or other sources for the names.

(I) Who owned the salvage and scrap companies which took and destroyed the evidence and then saw to its being shipped out of the country?--Jews

(j) And of course, we know Jews oversaw things as NSA sends all the raw data to Israel first thing.

(k) And over everything else, in case there's ever any need for any financing for any loose-end, there's the key, fundamental financial instrument, US Federal Reserve Bank COUNTERFEITING scam.

(l) And to keep things covered-up and the goyim diverted/distracted, there's the notoriously Jew-owned and -controlled mass-corp. Jews-media.

CONCLUSION: so u see kike, the evidence is so overwhelming, u kikes must now PROVE u didn't do it, but u can't, and all u do is accuse gentiles of being anti-Semitic, imagining this is going to work even when US Dollar collapses and people are forced to see who's really running things--kike criminals, like u Joannie. Beware beware beware beware beware--we're coming for u, kikes--and u will NOT escape, u murdering filth.

----------------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------

apsterian said:
"But Chris Bollyn gives outstanding evidence for Jews (which he always calls "Zionists") being present and responsible for planning, principle operations, cover-up for investigations and litigation, and then the dis-info campaign still on-going."

Really? So where is this "outstanding evidence"? We'd all like to know.

---------------------------------"Joan Edwards thereupon replied, below-copied---------------------

"CONCLUSION: so u see kike, the evidence is so overwhelming, u kikes must now PROVE u didn't do it,"

I repeat, where is the evidence? You have posted more allegations.

---------------------------------To which (above), I replied, below-copied----------------------

Clever Jews Now Plays "Who's Kidding Who?"
(Apollonian, 5 Aug 14)

Right kike, ho ho ho hoho

Is Chertoff really Chertoff?--did Chertoff see to the destruction of (rubble) evidence?--or is that mere "allegation"?

What happened to the "dancing Israelis" set-up w. cameras to "document the event"?  Where's Dominic Suter?--he's the kike who ran the Israeli front for the "dancing Israelis."

Kike: ur problem is who's kidding who, eh, kike?  ho ho ho ho ho ho

Further, I note we had similar discussion back, over a week ago, didn't we, Joannie the kike?--ck "Ian Greenhalgh" post of July 14, entries for July 25--ck them out.

Did Jews run the security for WTC and the airports?--is that just allegation?

Kike: NEWSFLASH--u need to prove Jews were not at the bottom of 9/11--and all the other conspiracies--which u can't do--which is why u keep playing these idiot mind-games, eh?  Ho ho ho ho ho  Tell us more, kike.

1 comment:

  1. Joan EdwardsAugust 5, 2014 at 5:36 PM

    apsterian said:
    "....did Chertoff see to the destruction of (rubble) evidence?--or is that mere "allegation"?

    First, you have to establish the rubble evidence was "destroyed" and what you mean by "destroyed." You are implying or alleging something illegal happened in the disposal of the rubble.

    "What happened to the "dancing Israelis" set-up w. cameras to "document the event"?

    Another question about an alleged event. Where's your proof it even took place?

    "Where's Dominic Suter?--he's the kike who ran the Israeli front for the "dancing Israelis."

    So what? You think he demolished the towers? If so, where's the evidence?

    "Did Jews run the security for WTC and the airports?--is that just allegation?

    It's an implication that because there were Jewish run security companies, they helped demolish the WTC?

    "u need to prove Jews were not at the bottom of 9/11--and all the other conspiracies--which u can't do"

    Prove a negative? I don't think so.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Apster responded:
    apsterianAugust 5, 2014 at 5:50 PM

    Joannie: Kike Lawyer, Ho Ho Ho--Will She Be Able To Win Her Case? Ho Ho Ho

    Joan: u pathetic kike, ho ho ho ho ho

    U can EASILY google (or any other search engine) for the info u seek, u utterly dis-honest kike, kike w. capital KKKK, ho ho ho.

    Yes, stupid Jew scum, it certainly is an implication "that because there were Jewish run security companies, they helped demolish the WTC."

    Finally, Joan poses the quandary about "proving negative," when it's simply a matter of science and induction--there's all this evidence that convicts Jews; Jews need to show it could have been someone else--and kikes know they can't, so they do what u do Joannie, ho ho ho ho--pretend u're stupid and ask moronic questions, lying and insisting evidence isn't evidence, quibbling over definition of "evidence," etc.



    ReplyDelete