new blogs

ck; also,

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

We DON'T NEED MORE "Limited Hangout" Balderdash pretending there are "good Jews"

Half-Baked Anti-Semitism Is Not Needed
(Apollonian, 31 Aug 10)

"Answer": I merely said u provide no real, substantial analysis--not to mention a plan. See below-copied fm, "Ground Zero...," 31 Aug 10, comments. So all u come off with is SMARM, SMARM, SMARM, smug, smug, smug--u don't help anyone w. any real info. People already know well-enough we need effective anti-semitism; u don't provide too much effective substance which will endure, is my pt.

We need and should prefer QUALITY, substance, and real info--not half-assed smarm, as urs is soooo often--like so many others.

In fact, the danger is u're just another one of the "limited hangout" Jewwy suckalongs who pretend there are "good Jews"--like there are good psychopaths--the "zionists" then being the only "bad" Jews.

And I DO PROVIDE info and serious analysis: u must attack at the "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see and for expo/ref.) WEAK-SPOT in the large Judeo-conspiracy--it's NOT just a "ZIONIST" plot.

For zionists are merely one part to it (large Judeo-conspiracy), one faction of topmost masterminds, they leading the "right-conservative" faction which then includes the JCs who are single strongest, most influential group/faction of gentiles--JCs intimidating practically all the rest of the Christian volk, hence people of Western society.

Jews at top play a "good-cop, bad-cop" charade, the "left-liberals" of CFR-Bilderberg behind communist United Nations (UN), vs. "right-conservatives" zionists and "neo-cons," as I pt'd out for u earlier.

"Saladin" is just a rug-head sand-nigger (based in California, if I'm not mistaken) who sucks along at these various blogspot blogs, supervised and overseen by Jews, which only attack "zionists" but insist then there are "good-Jews." Patriots--real patriots--must take-out ALL the Jews, the only "good one" being a dead one, I say.

And of course, along w. Jews, all their gentile sympathizers must be dealt with too, naturally.

"Saladin" is one of these half-brained "politically correct" morons who imagines mud-race people, along w. "good" Jews will be able to defeat the "bad" zionists, yet maintaining a PC dictatorship over and against the white Christian people. It's useless to removing "zionists" but leaving sand-niggers like "Saladin."

And "answer," u don't really have to have too much "interest" in Christianity--EXCEPT for fact it is the traditional CULTURE of this USA which u MUST respect. U can be non-Christian if u like, but u cannot be anti-Christ--that's the only proviso to which u WILL heed upon pain of treason, etc. And Muslims have no place here in USA, a Christian nation (actually, a federation), made by white Christians for white Christians and which WILL serve white Christians, never doubt.

CONCLUSION: Notice afore-mentioned sand-nigger exults in the censorship of my submissions, a perfect example why Muslims must not and WILL NOT be tolerated in USA. Thanks for ur attn. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

------------------above by Ap in response to below-copied-------------------

Saladin said...
Pay no attention to that idiot comment above, you are doing just fine. My theory is that it was the Super Freedom Hating from those Muslims that knocked the buildings down! They hate freedom so much they can level skyscrapers with a single thought.
August 31, 2010 10:30 AM

TheAnswer said...
@AppollonianDid you come all the way back here just to troll and rant about nothing? I try to burst through the dirty propaganda put out by the Jewish-run mainstream media and break down the mental illness passed off as "normalcy" and "status quo". There are a lot of zombies out there and my articles are sure to cause a few heads to turn. I could care less what you think. I could care less if YOU have heard this stuff before -- many haven't and my rhetoric should prove enlightening to them. So go proselytize on some street corners or whatever you do. Christianity is a fictional belief system that I have no interest in.
August 31, 2010 10:44 AM

Saladin said...
He has been 86ed from several blogs that I know of because of his amazing talent for typing a whole lot of nothing and managing to be very annoying in the process.
August 31, 2010 10:47 AM

TheAnswer said...
@SaladinYeah, those Muslims are so god-damn cunning that the intelligence services and multi-billion dollar defenses of America and Britain systematically fail to stop them on 9/11 & 7/7... but magically CANADA and its piddly defense budget -- compared to US/UK -- has foiled every so-called 'terror plot' on its soil and has suffered no major attack! Is this logical? lol
August 31, 2010 10:51 AM

TheAnswer said...
@ SaladinYeah he got pretty annoying pretty quick.
August 31, 2010 11:02 AM

-------------------above comments are in response to below-copied by Ap--------

"Answer" Needs To Do More Than Mere Smarmy-Type Platitudes
(Apollonian, 31 Aug 10)

Yeah, "answer," I must say it's hard to disagree w. most of this latest presentation of urs--but that's because it's really so much fairly empty platitudes, I submit, which have actually been hrd many times before, I'd add.

U don't really analyze too well; rather, u just describe things in a slick, glib, and sanctimonious manner, and u surely don't provide a plan to counter-act for the problem(s).

So are people to organize?--if so, upon what principle? I'd say Jews (not just "zionists") are much the problem, Jews being Talmudists (see and for best Talmudic expo/ref.), and if people are to organize against Jews, isn't Christianity precisely the traditional attempt thereto?

But there's a problem then, isn't there?--regarding the Jews' allies and stooges, the "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see and for expo/ref.) hereticalists who so willingly serve enemy Israeli terror-state, isn't there? For JCs intimidate everyone else so well, don't they?

So then, I'd say these JCs are much the crux to the problem, JCs being integral for running "interference" for the Jews, but u and ur glib platitudes aren't very useful or practical regarding these JCs are they?

CONCLUSION: So I guess u imagine u provide a kind of an "answer" in a formal sort of way--but surely nothing of real, practical value or genuine information, just a smarmy sort of glibness. Keep trying, at least ur illustrations are still somewhat notable. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

No comments:

Post a Comment