Goon can't, won't figure-out what sovereignty is, that states are sovereign, union only having "delegated powers" not sovereignty....

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/pgottfried/the-de.../#new_comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Obsessed "Elite..." Struggles To Grasp What He Refuses To Accept
(Apollonian 11 Jan 19)

I would be curious to know exactly what this “lawful” process was.

I would be interested to know the process they used to overcome the supremacy clause.

The simple answer regards SOVEREIGNTY--which the state has and always had, having seceded fm G. Britain and the Articles Confederation--and which sovereignty is inalienable--which "elite..." can't seem to grasp. The union was/is mere AGENT of the states, w. only "DELEGATED POWERS"--which were duly un-delegated by the only sovereign entity, the state.

There's no magic ritual the state had to perform. Essentially, all that was/is needed is an announcement which is sufficiently backed by the people and/or their legislature or convention.

It only goes to show the basic thick-headed incompetence of ignorant fools who just can't--and won't--figure it all out regarding "exactly what this 'lawful' process was."

"Over-coming supremacy"?--was mere creation and agreement made by states w. one another (a), and (b) such "supremacy" exists only as whatever law or action was/is in accord w. Constitution, a creation of the states--and NOT to be decided by an agency of the agent union, like the Sup. ct. which is naturally biased, as pt'd out by Jefferson in Kentucky Resolution of 1798-9.

Thus the union can NEVER tell any sovereign entity, like the sovereign states, what to do--states are NOT slaves--the union can only say what's appropriate for itself, hence any party which is voluntary part of that union. An "IN-voluntary part" is SLAVERY by definition, and totally impossible and inconceivable--the very purpose of the agent union to PREVENT.


---------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------------

# 237, EliteCommInc. says:
January 11, 2019 at 1:04 pm GMT
@Coag

I would be curious to know exactly what this “lawful” process was.

I would be interested to know the process they used to overcome the supremacy clause.