new blogs

ck; also,

Saturday, February 18, 2017

"Dr. Dan's" scholarship far better than Hoffman's....

Below-copied essay/response by ap first submitted, but probably not to be published, at comments,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hoffman's Criticism Of "Dr. Dan" Fails
(Apollonian, 18 Feb 17)

Folks: Here once again we have Hoffman (see below-copied), self-appointed lawyer for Jews, defending them against excellent expo, in this case fm "Dr. Dan" (see below-copied). See, the only one who can criticize Jews, u understand, is Hoffman who imagines now he owns the Jews, only he can criticize Jews or their filthy Talmudic holdings.

Thus Hoffman applies his Talmudic-style assertions and dictum, also known as question-begging, and presumption, when he tells us above, in his reply to "Dr. Dan," 7:39 am, "...categories he would like us to believe apply generally to non-Israelites are simply untrue and non-applicable." And of course, Hoffman gives no reasoning for his Talmudic-style declaration(s). I rather think "Dr. Dan" is quite correct, and it's Hoffman who's off.

For WHY are they "non-applicable," Hoffman? It certainly would seem the spirit is quite much the same, and why wouldn't it be?--Hoffman doesn't bother to say.

Then Hoffman condescendingly tells us, "Old Test. injunctions" don't apply to Lutherans and Catholics of Dresden, but typically doesn't bother to say why. One can tell Hoffman learned a lot about Talmudic dictum and declaration without substantiation; it seems Hoffman rather envies the Jews. Hoffman regularly practices the very same sort of self-righteousness, as we've observed over and over, pretending only he can criticize Jews.

Next, Hoffman declares: "Judaism does not follow the Old Testament. It follows the Babylonian Talmud and cognate texts. Rabbi Shapira’s book “The King’s Torah” is Talmudic, not Biblical." But the Jews and rabbis themselves tell us they DO indeed follow the Torah and that their "midrash" (interpretation, hence Talmud) is simply the perfection thereof. And why wouldn't Talmudism be inspired fm material in Old Test.?--obviously and necessarily it is and must be.

Finally, Hoffman says quite tellingly in his note, "[r]eaders of Douglas Reed have been misled on this subject." And I pt. ur attn. to the loose-ref. pronoun, "this," which is typical symptom of schizophrenics and schizoids whose grasp on reality is notoriously tenuous.

But at least Hoffman consented to publish "Dr. Dan's" comment, which comment of Dr. Dan I think is extremely good, appropriate, and accurate for exposition on Talmud and Jews, better and to be preferred to Hoffman's.

-----------------Below-copied is "Dr. Dan's" original note-----------------

Dr. Dan said...

"The Holocaust is the Holy Grail of white guilt."
The Jews BRAG about and SELF DOCUMENT THEIR "holocausting" others and then "PLACE A YOKE" on Gentiles for SUPPOSEDLY doing the exact same thing to them.
Everything they claim the nazis did is an EXACT COPY of their own self-recorded history..
Deuteronomy 7:16, 20:16 “And thou shalt consume all the peoples which the Lord thy God shall deliver unto thee; thine eye shall not pity them…thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.”

Numbers c.5 v.2-4
Leviticus c.20 v.13 well, really the whole chapter
Exodus c.32 v.27
Numbers c.11 v.1-2
Numbers c.16 all
Numbers c.21 v.5-6
Numbers v.26 v.10
KILL anyone who engages in "DIVERSITY" or "INTEGRATION"
Numbers v25 v.4-8
Deuteronomy c.14 v.2
SEXUALLY ENSLAVE any females "who have not KNOWN a man"
a very brief selection, many more in THEIR book.
Numbers c.21 v.03 Canaanites
Numbers c.21 v.24 Amorites
Numbers c.21 v.33-35 Bashan
Numbers c.31 all Midianites
Numbers c.32 v. more Amorites
Deuteronomy c.2 v.34 People of Heshbon
Deuteronomy c.3 v.6 really the whole chapter. threescore cities
Joshua c.12 A list of victims of Israeli GENOCIDE
Numbers c.21 v.25
Numbers c.32 v.39
Numbers c.33 v.53
(just to name a FEW)
Numbers c.33 v.31-34
Deuteronomy c.7 v.2
Deuteronomy c.12 v.28-30
Deuteronomy c.20 v.11-16
Deuteronomy c.2 v.2
Deuteronomy c.7 v.1
Jews SELF-anointed "The CHOSEN People of GOD"
Nazis SELF-anointed "The CHOSEN People of GENETICS".
TODAY Israel states that it is creating "A PURE Jewish State"
YESTERDAY the Nazis were creating "A PURE German State"
And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword . . . (Joshua 6:21)
For modern day reinforcement of these "rules" research/google "the KINGS TORAH"

7:28 AM

-----------------------below-copied is Hoffman's response------------------

Michael Hoffman said...

Dr. Dan apparently does not read ancient Hebrew and does not know that the categories he would like us to believe apply generally to non-Israelites are simply untrue and non-applicable.

The Old Testament injunctions to war were on the nokri who practiced sex magic worship of false gods, not to Lutheran and Catholic Germans in Dresden.

Judaism does not follow the Old Testament. It follows the Babylonian Talmud and cognate texts. Rabbi Shapira’s book “The King’s Torah” is Talmudic, not Biblical.

Readers of Douglas Reed have been misled on this subject. I offer my book “Judaism’s Strange Gods” as an antidote.
7:39 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment