Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015...01533259056198
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Above babbling by anon at 8:46 pm (see below-copied) is just more blathering dis-info and assertion without substantiation, even against all evidence. After the first two paragraphs of nonsense, we get the following:
"...[I]t is quite clear that an aircraft hit the pentagon and two other aircraft hit the towers. There was no controlled demolition because it would have taken months to wire those buildings and cut all appropriate supports, and people would have seen it."
There's no evidence any plane hit the Pentagon; indeed, all evidence has been concealed and withheld. A plane couldn't have been traveling at the speed indicated and at such low level of altitude.
Observe further the transparent, blithe lies about planes hitting the WTC towers, the alleged planes going much too fast for the conditions and capability of the planes, not to mention the obvious doctoring of the vids of the planes, the one for the N. tower making an impossible and absurd hole in the bldg., and the other plane passing into the bldg. as if flowing through a sheet of water, when there would have been a tremendous explosion w. much if not most debris falling to the ground outside.
We know fm Rebekah Roth (see numerous u-tube vids) that Israeli agents ("art students") lived on the 91st floor for up to 4 yrs (!) before 9/11 and had construction worker passes to be able to go anywhere in the bldgs.
Further, who says it had to be controlled demo w. thermite?--as it could have been done w. micro-nukes or directed energy, according to Dr. Judy Wood (see WhereDidTheTowersGo.com or many u-tube vids).
Then we have the lies about heat to 500 degrees C, but steel disperses heat, and the fires didn't burn nearly hot enough or long enough, as is well-known.
Finally, observe the writer of the lies refers indefinitely to some unspecified "theory" which allegedly "just doesn't work," "desperately" held by "some people"--which obviously makes no sense.
Fact is, we know who did 9/11--JEWS and cohorts--and the only question is how much the people of the world and USA will continue to take fm these anti-human monsters before dealing w. the problem. Unfortunately, it looks like many will have to perish before the survivors even begin to glimpsing an inkling for solution.
And Jews have numerous strategically-placed cohorts within the gentile society, these all acting in accord w. satanic principles of lies and deception which too many people ignore and refuse to figure-out, these ideas having to do w. moralism and subjectivism.
Too bad we can't get any useful help fm the philosophical establishment for dealing w. this horrific satanic cultural complex--but we see, rather, it's very purpose of such establishment to see to security and furtherance of satanism, the crux to the infernal system being the criminal central-banking establishment, literally legalized COUNTERFEITING, key and essential practical instrument and mechanism making all else about the complex possible, effective, and successful for continuing "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler.
--------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------
AnonymousSeptember 20, 2015 at 8:46 PM
What we see in the video has to do with 1990's CCD camera technology that meters the light in the scene and compensates the 'exposure' (i don't think that's the right term). Because these cameras film at such a slow frame rate, a dramatic adjustment due to a bright event could cause only a frame or two to be washed out. I believe this is what we see in the video. In fact, i wouldn't be surprised if those CCD's were from the 1980's.
The videos of the towers being hit were not filmed on a 15 or less frames per second piece of junk CCD from the 80's or 90's. They were filmed at 30fps with cameras of MUCH higher quality and have much more sophisticated light metering and compensation.
As much as I dislike the Government, it is quite clear that an aircraft hit the pentagon and two other aircraft hit the towers. There was no controlled demolition because it would have taken months to wire those buildings and cut all appropriate supports, and people would have seen it.
Most importantly, the collapse of the towers as well as building 7 is easily explained by a simple concept anyone who has worked with steel understands. It's called "annealing". Heat hardened steel to 500'c and it loses over 50% of it's strength. With the towers already compromised structurally, this would have easily caused what we saw.
As for building 7, it's the same principal. But with that building the main support structure was steel reinforced concrete in the below ground levels. This was initially damaged from the towers coming down and for many hours afterward, the reinforced concrete was subjected to high temperatures due to the fires. Heat reinforced concrete to just a few hundred degrees C and it loses over 50% of it's strength. a few years ago here in California a gasoline tanker truck burst into flames under a freeway overpass that was much more robust than you see back east due to earthquake retrofits, and in no time the heat from the tanker fire caused the whole thing to collapse.
http://cbsnews2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i...ge2739453x.jpg
I'm not sure how how those fires in the trade center were, but the other night I tested how much heat was coming out of the top of my BBQ charcoal chimney starter thing with a thermocouple for my digital multimeter, and it read just over 900'f. That is just shy of 500'c. And I guarantee you the fires in those towers were much otter than that.
Don't get me wrong, this doesn't explain all the other sh*t that doesn't add up with 9/11. I just think that some people need to stop desperately hanging on to a theory that just doesn't work.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dis-Info Meant To Causing Confusion,
Dissension
(Apollonian, 20 Sep 15)
(Apollonian, 20 Sep 15)
Above babbling by anon at 8:46 pm (see below-copied) is just more blathering dis-info and assertion without substantiation, even against all evidence. After the first two paragraphs of nonsense, we get the following:
"...[I]t is quite clear that an aircraft hit the pentagon and two other aircraft hit the towers. There was no controlled demolition because it would have taken months to wire those buildings and cut all appropriate supports, and people would have seen it."
There's no evidence any plane hit the Pentagon; indeed, all evidence has been concealed and withheld. A plane couldn't have been traveling at the speed indicated and at such low level of altitude.
Observe further the transparent, blithe lies about planes hitting the WTC towers, the alleged planes going much too fast for the conditions and capability of the planes, not to mention the obvious doctoring of the vids of the planes, the one for the N. tower making an impossible and absurd hole in the bldg., and the other plane passing into the bldg. as if flowing through a sheet of water, when there would have been a tremendous explosion w. much if not most debris falling to the ground outside.
We know fm Rebekah Roth (see numerous u-tube vids) that Israeli agents ("art students") lived on the 91st floor for up to 4 yrs (!) before 9/11 and had construction worker passes to be able to go anywhere in the bldgs.
Further, who says it had to be controlled demo w. thermite?--as it could have been done w. micro-nukes or directed energy, according to Dr. Judy Wood (see WhereDidTheTowersGo.com or many u-tube vids).
Then we have the lies about heat to 500 degrees C, but steel disperses heat, and the fires didn't burn nearly hot enough or long enough, as is well-known.
Finally, observe the writer of the lies refers indefinitely to some unspecified "theory" which allegedly "just doesn't work," "desperately" held by "some people"--which obviously makes no sense.
Fact is, we know who did 9/11--JEWS and cohorts--and the only question is how much the people of the world and USA will continue to take fm these anti-human monsters before dealing w. the problem. Unfortunately, it looks like many will have to perish before the survivors even begin to glimpsing an inkling for solution.
And Jews have numerous strategically-placed cohorts within the gentile society, these all acting in accord w. satanic principles of lies and deception which too many people ignore and refuse to figure-out, these ideas having to do w. moralism and subjectivism.
Too bad we can't get any useful help fm the philosophical establishment for dealing w. this horrific satanic cultural complex--but we see, rather, it's very purpose of such establishment to see to security and furtherance of satanism, the crux to the infernal system being the criminal central-banking establishment, literally legalized COUNTERFEITING, key and essential practical instrument and mechanism making all else about the complex possible, effective, and successful for continuing "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler.
--------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------
AnonymousSeptember 20, 2015 at 8:46 PM
What we see in the video has to do with 1990's CCD camera technology that meters the light in the scene and compensates the 'exposure' (i don't think that's the right term). Because these cameras film at such a slow frame rate, a dramatic adjustment due to a bright event could cause only a frame or two to be washed out. I believe this is what we see in the video. In fact, i wouldn't be surprised if those CCD's were from the 1980's.
The videos of the towers being hit were not filmed on a 15 or less frames per second piece of junk CCD from the 80's or 90's. They were filmed at 30fps with cameras of MUCH higher quality and have much more sophisticated light metering and compensation.
As much as I dislike the Government, it is quite clear that an aircraft hit the pentagon and two other aircraft hit the towers. There was no controlled demolition because it would have taken months to wire those buildings and cut all appropriate supports, and people would have seen it.
Most importantly, the collapse of the towers as well as building 7 is easily explained by a simple concept anyone who has worked with steel understands. It's called "annealing". Heat hardened steel to 500'c and it loses over 50% of it's strength. With the towers already compromised structurally, this would have easily caused what we saw.
As for building 7, it's the same principal. But with that building the main support structure was steel reinforced concrete in the below ground levels. This was initially damaged from the towers coming down and for many hours afterward, the reinforced concrete was subjected to high temperatures due to the fires. Heat reinforced concrete to just a few hundred degrees C and it loses over 50% of it's strength. a few years ago here in California a gasoline tanker truck burst into flames under a freeway overpass that was much more robust than you see back east due to earthquake retrofits, and in no time the heat from the tanker fire caused the whole thing to collapse.
http://cbsnews2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i...ge2739453x.jpg
I'm not sure how how those fires in the trade center were, but the other night I tested how much heat was coming out of the top of my BBQ charcoal chimney starter thing with a thermocouple for my digital multimeter, and it read just over 900'f. That is just shy of 500'c. And I guarantee you the fires in those towers were much otter than that.
Don't get me wrong, this doesn't explain all the other sh*t that doesn't add up with 9/11. I just think that some people need to stop desperately hanging on to a theory that just doesn't work.
No comments:
Post a Comment