Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015...l#comment-form
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
It's actually true that Christianity is magnificent religion of worship of TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) above all/any other precepts, hence dear Christianity being most rational religion, appealing to one's reason.
Islam, on the other hand is reactionary throw-back to a form of the earlier Abrahamic idea, evidently, Allah simply commanding, the adherents simply obeying and submitting to superior will, assured they will benefit thereby. There's really no reason to Islam; one must simply OBEY, sucker, or bad things gonna happen.
Christians are given a reason that Christianity is best as truth is the ONLY way to Godly happiness. Further, Christians are given an insight upon satanism (extreme subjectivism) and satan's foremost henchmen, the Jews, who make themselves God w. their filthy midrash and Talmud based upon "Oral Law Tradition" by which they interpret ("midrash") the original, basic thing, the Torah law of Moses.
Thus Christianity upholds the Aristotelian objective, determined reality against Jew lies and subjectivism (Gosp. JOHN 8:44).
Note then how mystic "faith" of beleeeeeeeeeeevin' is NECESSARILY upheld by Jews and Muslims, whereas reason is ideal of Christianity, reason and honesty (opposed to Jew dis-honesty) constituting the Holy Spirit, means by which truth (= Christ) is apprehended.
--------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------
Dreadnought December 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM
These issues you raise are distinct from each other. Bad, well it's bad in relation to the Quakers, the Jehovah's Witnesses etc. It wants to dominate me and the world and I despise that idea, the Christian method gives you free will, the Muslim doesn't.
I don't see any Muslims blamed for Sandy Hook, nor the reporter shooting nor the black church shooting. They are added in the mix, they are handy for the powers to resort to but that doesn't mean I otherwise agree with their ideals. I don't and I think Ibn Wariq is pretty much on the money with his view that Islam is simply all made up as is the prophet Mohammed. Yes I am saying Kevin is part of a bad Religion. It's delusional and dangerous and is fostered in countries where ignorance and superstition are lauded over science and female equality to name but two aspects. I didn't know he was Muslim and frankly didn't care one way or the other. The day he tries to convince me that Mohammed on a flying horse actually happened and that I must believe it too, I might have some concern about him. If until then he comes out with rational stuff, his religion is irrelevant. I really don't like all this Muslims are victims nonsense either. If you wander around claiming your religious views outweigh everyone else's, you would surely expect to be shunned. You can find my comment how you wish, that's part of my informed post enlightenment view of the world. If it is irrational, by your attitude, on the example of Kevin's belief and his entitlement to his irrational religious belief, I should be allowed it in any case, shouldn't I? Allan Powell
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Most Sublime Christianity Most Compatible With
Divine Reason
(Apollonian, 9 Dec 15)
(Apollonian, 9 Dec 15)
It's actually true that Christianity is magnificent religion of worship of TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) above all/any other precepts, hence dear Christianity being most rational religion, appealing to one's reason.
Islam, on the other hand is reactionary throw-back to a form of the earlier Abrahamic idea, evidently, Allah simply commanding, the adherents simply obeying and submitting to superior will, assured they will benefit thereby. There's really no reason to Islam; one must simply OBEY, sucker, or bad things gonna happen.
Christians are given a reason that Christianity is best as truth is the ONLY way to Godly happiness. Further, Christians are given an insight upon satanism (extreme subjectivism) and satan's foremost henchmen, the Jews, who make themselves God w. their filthy midrash and Talmud based upon "Oral Law Tradition" by which they interpret ("midrash") the original, basic thing, the Torah law of Moses.
Thus Christianity upholds the Aristotelian objective, determined reality against Jew lies and subjectivism (Gosp. JOHN 8:44).
Note then how mystic "faith" of beleeeeeeeeeeevin' is NECESSARILY upheld by Jews and Muslims, whereas reason is ideal of Christianity, reason and honesty (opposed to Jew dis-honesty) constituting the Holy Spirit, means by which truth (= Christ) is apprehended.
--------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------
Dreadnought December 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM
These issues you raise are distinct from each other. Bad, well it's bad in relation to the Quakers, the Jehovah's Witnesses etc. It wants to dominate me and the world and I despise that idea, the Christian method gives you free will, the Muslim doesn't.
I don't see any Muslims blamed for Sandy Hook, nor the reporter shooting nor the black church shooting. They are added in the mix, they are handy for the powers to resort to but that doesn't mean I otherwise agree with their ideals. I don't and I think Ibn Wariq is pretty much on the money with his view that Islam is simply all made up as is the prophet Mohammed. Yes I am saying Kevin is part of a bad Religion. It's delusional and dangerous and is fostered in countries where ignorance and superstition are lauded over science and female equality to name but two aspects. I didn't know he was Muslim and frankly didn't care one way or the other. The day he tries to convince me that Mohammed on a flying horse actually happened and that I must believe it too, I might have some concern about him. If until then he comes out with rational stuff, his religion is irrelevant. I really don't like all this Muslims are victims nonsense either. If you wander around claiming your religious views outweigh everyone else's, you would surely expect to be shunned. You can find my comment how you wish, that's part of my informed post enlightenment view of the world. If it is irrational, by your attitude, on the example of Kevin's belief and his entitlement to his irrational religious belief, I should be allowed it in any case, shouldn't I? Allan Powell
No comments:
Post a Comment