* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Latest Exciting Dialectic W. Metro-Sexual Genius
(Collected & Posted, 24 May 15)
(Collected & Posted, 24 May 15)
Here's another dialectic, found at another K. Johnson vid, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2JfE7RrMlM
Apollonian Apollonius
May 18, 2015
+Stephen Waddock But steve, where are the bodies?--and HOW do u know anything?--ANYTHING?--because ZOG criminals told u, that's all--AND U BELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEV, that's how--like the most stupid, brainless moron. Patriots demand evidence and proof--blood, pictures, bodies, u know?
-------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 19, 2015
"Patriots...". You're not Patriots, you're laughable, ignorant assholes. Who seek to deny the families their Right to grieve simply because you're so stupid as to NOT be able to apply critical thinking skills.
People who had the Right, the authority or the legal standing HAVE seen the photos and the bodies of those murdered that day. You don't have that Right or legal standing. Claiming no one has, only goes to show how completely ignorant you are of the process.
Two of the wakes WERE open casket, open to family and friends.
You seem to forget or just not care, these were children shot multiple times by a high-powered weapon. There ARE laws in CT, as well as, 15 other states who protect the Rights and privacy of child victims and victims in general.
You're an idiot, not a Patriot.
----------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 19, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Stevie, u dumb little, metro-sexual bastard: u assume that (dead kidsoes) which requires proof--get it? "Right, authority, legal standing"?--they have no right to dictate reality or what they insist are "facts" to the people who provide the courts and pay the judges and thugs calling themselves "police"--get the picture, u little bastard? And because crisis actors say anything doesn't make it true, shit-for-brains punk.
So kids got shot w. "high-power weapon"?--u don't know that, and u can't prove it, u just taking ZOG's word, like gullible little sucker u are, pretending to "critical thinking," ho ho ho ho ho oho, typical metro-sexual moron, ho ho hoho
And why wasn't public allowed to inspect the school to view all the horrendous damage which must have been inflicted on doors, walls, ceilings, windows, and floors by that "high-powered weapon," eh, noodle-brains?
Notice how u're all a bunch of kikes and metro-sexual filth?--u LOVE big-bro., don't u?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 19, 2015
First, you're an idiot. You claim crisis actors but yet, that's factually incorrect. You would have to prove these were not the parents of children killed. You didn't and you can't.
"they have no right to dictate reality or what they insist are "facts" to the people who provide the courts and pay the judges and thugs calling themselves "police"--"
You're completely delusional. "They" didn't dictate anything. The laws are the laws and they have to be followed. You're ignorant on the process and your comment highlights that point.
"So kids got shot w. "high-power weapon"?--u don't know that, and u can't prove it, u just taking ZOG's word, like gullible little sucker u are, pretending to "critical thinking," ho ho ho ho ho oho, typical metro-sexual moron, ho ho hoho"
The evidence proves it. The recovered weapons, recovered (photographed) shell casings, the missing weapons from the Lanza house, the recovered bullets from the building and victims. You claim all those reports are false without any proof to the claim. Nothing more than assertions. The stock and trade of Nutters, assertion.
"And why wasn't public allowed to inspect the school to view all the horrendous damage which must have been inflicted on doors, walls, ceilings, windows, and floors by that "high-powered weapon," eh, noodle-brains?"
When has "the public" been allowed to inspect any crime scene?
Moron.
------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 19, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Ho ho ho, righto, queer, ho ho ho ho
--------------------------------------
wiwille
May 19, 2015
+Apollonian Apollonius Typical, unintelligible response from someone who has no proof to back up their tasteless claims.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 19, 2015
+wiwille what's "unintelligible," moron?--u're just a bunch of Jews and queers sucking-up for ZOG. Little queer, stevie, says we have to prove anything, when it's ZOG who must prove, obviously--he and u are jokes, ho ho hoo ho--is that so "unintelligible"? Ho ho ho ho
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 19, 2015
+Apollonian Apollonius Wow, are you quite the bigot. I bet your parents are proud.
-------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 19, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Newsflash, sucker: Jews and queers are anti-Christ enemies of reason and humanity, and u show u're ok w. that. Did u know, for example, Jews follow the Talmud wherein they gloat over having killed Christ, saying it's ok to murder and lie to gentiles? Ck Talmudical.BlogSpot.com, RevisionistReview.BlogSpot.com, or Come-and-hear.com. U're just a metro-sexual little psychopath w. no concept of justice.
------------------------------------------------------
wiwille
May 19, 2015
"unintelligible: Difficult or impossible to understand or comprehend; incomprehensible." There's definitely a moron in this conversation, and it's clearly you, the bigoted wonder you are. There's a strong correlation between bigotry and conspiracy theories, as both require you to abandon reason. You're beyond hope as you clearly have no idea where the burden of proof lies, nor do you seem to care. I just hope you can leave the grieving families alone, as they've suffered enough without the nonsense you and your ilk spew online.
----------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 19, 2015
+wiwille"wiwille": do u grasp u're assuming what it is to be proven?--"grieving families"--metro-sexual scum like u are psychotic, and that's a justified prejudice, not mere self-righteous "bigotry," dumbass.
-------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 19, 2015
+Apollonian Apollonius did you know you're an ignorant bigot?
Are you a bible-babbler?
---------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 19, 2015
Why can't you prove just one of your points? Lack the facts or the mental chops...which is it?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 19, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Here's one thing, shit-for-brains, metro-sexual fool: those who assert there was shooting, deaths of 26, including small kids, bear burden of proof--that's fact--and u can't prove, just assert, and u say if ZOG says so, then it must be true--that's what facts are.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 19, 2015
Yeah, that's using logic and common sense. Shootings happen EVERY DAY in the US.
These type of mass shootings happen about every 20 days.
There is OVERWHELMING proof. Parents without their children, certificates of death, statements from the survivors, statements from the 1st-responders, reports from the CSP and Ct State Med Examiners Office, statements from the funeral directors.....NONE of which you can prove false.
Willful ignorance defines you Nutters. YOU carry the burden of proof, not those who acknowledge the fact this event happened.
Go ahead, show us all how stupid you are.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 19, 2015
+Stephen Waddock"Parents without their children" is what needs proving, moron--not what is proven, u utterly psychotic metro-sexual filth, ho hoh o ho ho ho. I'll stop there, conclusively showing ur psychotic mentality, eh? Ho ho ho ho ho
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 19, 2015
Prove any of those children didn't die or were not the children of those parents.
YOU carry the burden of proof. Apparently, you have no idea how it works. YOU made the claim.
The shooting IS the null hypothesis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 19, 2015
+Stephen Waddock U see stevie: that's ur psychosis--U (OR ZOG) MUST DO THE PROVING ANYONE DIED, DUMBASS--do u see now how and why metro-sexuals are psychos? Ho ho ho ho ho ho ho
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 19, 2015
You need to step eating those urinal mints. They have destroyed what little brain you had.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 19, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Well stevie, "urinal mints" or not, u and ZOG are the ones who must prove, as I note--and I stand by that simple concept which u can't deny in reason or logic, metro-sexual moron, ho ho ho ho ho
------------------------------------------------------------------------
wiwille
May 21, 2015
As Stephen said, you made the claim, you back it up with actual facts, not speculation, not illiterate screeds and name calling. You made the extraordinary claim, it's on you to back up with extraordinary evidence. Facts!
You know what, never mind, because you have no facts, and you'll respond to his just as brilliantly as you have previously, and you'll continue to waste everyone's time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 21, 2015
+wiwille wiwille: actually, ZOG made the "claim," right?--that (a) Adam (b) shot and killed 26, etc.? U say we should BELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEV ZOG, right? And we say ZOG lies, and is lying now, w. no proof, no evidence, no pictures, bodies, blood, right? So, wiwille, it's u who deserves no respect, a liar, along w. ZOG, u a queer, defending ZOG and its lies, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 21, 2015
Plenty of evidence. Survivor eyewitnesses to the shooting. Surviving wounded, 1st-responders, weapons used, shell casings used, bullet holes, body of the shooter, his mothers car, her body....Denying any of this in lieu of your Hoaxer claims is dishonest. Claiming that because you can't physically see the evidence, personally only goes to show you lack of logic, reason and critical thinking skills.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 21, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Stevie: u're psychotically repeating urself, AGAIN, eh?--presuming what must be proven. Fact is the witnesses are now nowhere to be found, not giving any statements, which statements conflict and change.
"Dishonest"?--ho ho ho--stevie, u're the liar. And if I can't see the evidence, I'm bound to admit, in all honesty, there's no proof--how is such honesty "lack of logic"? "Critical thinking skills"?--ho ho ho ho--more typical metro-sexual lingo, eh?
Why the non-disclosure demanded of demolition workers?
Tell us, stevie: u simply insist on BELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVIN' ZOG, right? U also believe in "global-warming," and u want world gov., w. strict gun-control, right? Ho ho ho ho ho
------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 21, 2015
+Stephen Waddock "Critical thinking skills"?--ho ho ho ho ho--that means one must beleeeeeeeeeeeeev whatever ZOG says, eh? Hey stevie, can u list or itemize any of those "skills" that constitute "critical thinking"?--is it anything like thinking itself? Tell us all about it, by all means, ho ho ho ho ho U sure are an advanced thinker, for sure, ho ho ho ho ho
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 21, 2015
+Stephen Waddock After all, Wolfgang criticizes the sandy hoax, and u resent him for it--doesn't really seem like u appreciate critical thinking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 21, 2015
No, you're comment is a straw man. I resent the stupidity of his position. The ignorance of his position.
I was raised differently this moron and, apparently, different than you. I was taught about morals, values, honesty and to stick up for those who cannot defend themselves.
"doesn't really seem like u appreciate critical thinking"
You make dishonest claim in light of the evidence, proof, documents, eyewitnesses to this even that proves you're completely daft.
YOU'RE the one who doesn't appreciate critical thinking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 21, 2015
+Stephen Waddock stevie: "morals"?--what's that?--u can't even say. U're a psychotic schizoid, stevie--u can't even define the words and phrases u use, like "critical thinking"--u don't even understand thinking. In fact, u're plainly pathologic liar. Basically, all u do is say, ZOG says so, so therefore we should beleeeeeeeeeeeeeeev--that's all. Simple honesty manifests there's no proof of sandy hoax. And u're dishonest.
For IF u were really honest, u'd admit all the conflicting and plainly FALSE statements of all the so-called "witnesses" are precisely what gives lie to this gross hoax--including the Newtown Bee paper which published false stories, like the one they first said they did in talking to the Principal, the "secretaries" who said they hid in closet for hrs and hrs. U're the one grossly dis-honest, stevie, u scummy, lying, little metro-sexual.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 21, 2015
+Stephen Waddock"Honesty"?--u don't know the meaning of the word, stevie--look at Gene Rosen, a GROSS LIAR, who gave NUMEROUS conflicting stories, and u aren't even honest enough to admit this lying by Rosen discredits sandy hoax. U just blow-off faker like Robbie Parker & Carver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 21, 2015
How is Gene Rosen proof that Adam Lanza did not shoot and kill 26 people at SHES on Dec 14, 2012?
You know Gene Rosen is lying? Prove it. Show us how you know his intent. Prove he is attempting to deceive...or maybe, just maybe he is a confused senior citizen trying to come to grips with what happened that day.
But of course, you're able know-all and see-all, right?
Proof and evidence, that's not how you do it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 21, 2015
+Stephen Waddock U can easily ck gene Rosen on u-tube, he giving numerous fake, conflicting stories. HOW do u Prove lies?--simply by pt-ing to the conflicting stories--only one of them could possibly be true, the others are necessarily lies. "Confusion" OFTEN goes w. lying, stupid--it's no excuse.
Among the statements fm the very few witnesses fm among the little kids, there were no reports of hearing shots. One said it sounded like the janitor knocked down stuff in the closet, another said it sounded like kicking the door.
And u're PLAINLY dis-honest, refusing to admit u beleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeev in "global warming," world gov., BUT don't worry, stevie, we know u're the typical metro-sexual "progressive" (ho ho ho ho) who goes along w. and shills for ZOG, etc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 21, 2015
No, WRONG. You're ASSUMING his intent was to deceive. You have no idea what his intent was. Add to that, he was completely distraught in the videos...unable to comprehend how someone could do this to children. YOU dishonestly claim you know something you don't.
To children who were hidden in closets, behind closed doors, hidden in small bathroom....behind locked doors, through cinder-block walls...To them , shot's may have sounded a lot like what they described. That's the best way they could describe what they heard...relating it to something the know...and you think that's odd. Again, its nothing more than YOU attempting to re-frame what those children heard.
If you used ANY common sense, the loud noises they heard WERE NOT found to be made by anything else.
Actually, I don't "believe" in Climate Change...I acknowledge Climate Change because, unlike you, I understand the science.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 21, 2015
+Stephen Waddock U're one presuming (a), that he (Rosen) was "distraught," (b) that there were children, (c) that anything was "done." One might be "distraught" right at first, but then calms down later. Rosen's intent was to deceive, proven by the numerous phony stories. Rosen also said he wasn't at the firehouse, but then we see him in a vid.
Stevie: u don't even know what "science" is--u think it's what's done and talked about by men in white coats, that's all--u're the typical pretentious metro-sexual who lies, like ur heroes, like Gene Rosen.
There are actually too few "witnesses," given there supposedly HUNDREDS of students, but only about a dozen are ever shown in any picture--like the one shown by NewTown Bee editor who took the picture some other time when it was much warmer.
U're a metro-sexual shill, probably a queer, lying and special-pleading for sandy-hoax, stevie, utterly dishonest and worthless.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 21, 2015
No, I'm not. You seem to have, not only any critical thinking skills but, no common sense.
In the videos he is clearly distraught...asking over and over, "how could anyone do this?" Of course you, being a completely insensitive Hoaxer, are unable to comprehend human emotions. Specially when portraying them as something other than they are, fits your delusional narrative.
" Rosen also said he wasn't at the firehouse, but then we see him in a vid"
Yes, Gene was at the firehouse. He told people that, so what? He and the bus driver walked achild who wasn’t picked up at his house over to be reunited with his/her parents. He later went back to the firehouse with the woman who came to his house looking for her son.
SO WHAT? Now tell me how that prove Adam Lanza didn't shoot and kill anyone at SHES on Dec. 14, 2012
"There are actually too few "witnesses," given there supposedly HUNDREDS of students,"
Wrong...there are plenty of students. Those who ran past Lanza when is gun jammed or was reloading, those who saw bodies in the hallway...and those teachers who saw their coworkers shot up. Do you think you can just dismiss them because it's convenient?
Science...You want to debate Science...with me? I'll warn you now, you're in over you head, but if you must.....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 21, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Stevie: u can't even think, much less "critically," ho hoho ho
One can be "distraught," but one calms down--esp. an adult. And substantial fraud for one detail discredits the whole. Stevie, u're just a metro-sexual shill. U beleeeeeeeeeev In crap, like "climate-change," and THEN u claim science and spout about "critical thinking," ho ho ho ho
U idiotically just assert without any substantiation about "lots of students," etc.
Stevie: "climate-change" is fraud for weak-minded metro-sexuals like u who pretend to "advanced-thinking" and "sensitivity" for liars. U're completely dis-credited, buddy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 22, 2015
+Apollonian Apollonius Oh, so.......now your an expert on Human Psychology, right?
You're not even worth the time discussing ANY topic as you merely state your emotion as fact, fail to support it with evidence and then claim victory. Again, truth is, you have no idea about what you're posting and you lack the honesty to discuss in a genuine manner
Stay away from anything Science, you're ill-equipped to discuss. You comments and position(s) would lead me to think, you're a bible-babbler, correct?
-------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 22, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Stevie: all we do is maintain there's no evidence to support (a) Adam Lanza, (b) or any shootings (c) of 27 people (including Lanza's "mom"), ho ho ho, and it's up to u metro-sexuals and psychopaths to provide the proof which u can't do, merely making excuses for known and proven liars like Gene Rosen.
Claiming "victory" is simple as pt-ing out ur inability to provide the evidence, not to mention ur moronic insistence there is evidence, that we have to prove the reverse.
U're obviously the obligatory metro-sexual, "advanced-thinker" babbling about "critical-thinking skills," ho ho ho ho ho, pushing the typical agenda, in favor of homosexuals, "climate-change," world gov, dictatorship of world gov., anti-Christ, and anti-Constitution.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 22, 2015
Funny, I don't recall "Christ" or god in the US Constitution....other than mentioning of the date. Funny, why is that?
You're not real food at this "thinking" stuff, huh?
You're clearly in over your head.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 22, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Stevie: how can u prove the stupor bowl kids WERE NOT those u insist without proof were killed?--why is it absurd?--why wouldn't u metro-sexual psychotics do such a thing in way of playing joke upon the public for whom u have so much contempt, pretending u're "progressive" and "advanced-thinker" w. "critical-thinking skills"? ho ho ho ho ho
And if I WAS "Bible-babbler," then why wouldn't I have done some "babbling" already, moron? Ho ho ho ho. But I am proud anti-semite, for sure, so therefore fall on side of dear Christianity, indubitably. Don't u realize Christ = truth, according to Gosp. JOHN 14:6--against Jew lies (JOHN 8:44) and liars, like u?
----------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 22, 2015
How?...BECAUSE THOSE CHILDREN WERE DEAD.
Christ = Man, not god. But, you'll believe in anything.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 22, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Stevie: I gave u the citation, moron; Christ is metaphor for TRUTH, the only way to Godly happiness. Thus Christ stands for the objective reality which necessarily underlies any "truth"--against Pharisaic subjectivism, foundation of their lies.
Stevie: what dead children?--u're just taking ZOG's word for it all, going along w. the lies and fakery--like u make excuses for Gene Rosen, insisting he was "distraught" and confused.
All I do is pt. out one cannot prove there is no God--isn't that quite rational?--unlike u who insists, upon no evidence or reasoning, there is no God, having been told that if u want to be "advanced-thinker," then this is what u must beleeeeeeeeeeeeeev and say.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 22, 2015
Jesus was a prophet...there were many prophet in those days.
"Godly happiness....blah..blah...blah..." You mean like murder of innocent children?
Prove Noah Pozner didn't die. Prove Lenny Pozner didn't have a son killed name Noah Pozner.
The facts on are my side, Tard.
I didn't say there was no god. There is no evidence to make me believe there is a god.
It's called Critical Thinking...you're not doing it right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 22, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Stevie: AGAIN (and u've done this numerous times now, true to ur amazing psychosis), it's u who must prove Pozner died. "Facts"?--u don't know what a fact is, despite ur "critical thinking," ho ho ho ho
U're just the typical, half-baked metro-sexual, pushing ZOG's NWO agenda, including now, as u've admitted, "climate-change" fraud--all because someone told u this is what advanced-thinkers spout, and u're desperate to be thought "advanced" and "progressive," right?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Waddock
May 22, 2015
Noah Pozner's existence is not up for debate. If you think it is, you're showing you lack of ability to research your claims.
His cert of death is online. His open casket wake was held and he was viewed by many family and friends.
You don't get to claim things just because you want them to be true.
Prove Noah Pozner didn't die. YOU carry the burden of proof, not me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 22, 2015
+Stephen Waddock Stevie: that cert. of death is PROVEN fraud--see http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015/05/lenny-pozner-strikes-out-with-obvioulsy.html
"The article include an analysis of the copy of the "death certificate" for Noah Pozner that Lenny provided to Kelley, which turns out to be a fake. If Noah had actually died at Sandy Hook, there would have been no reason to fake one, which implies that Noah did not die at Sandy Hook and confirms that Lenny is a fraud. Here is the certificate: [see site, above, at link.]"
Stevie: how does it feel to be shown-up for such a gullible sucker, as u are? Ho ho ho ho
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
wiwille
May 22, 2015
Why do you keep typing "ho ho ho ho" when a) nothing of humor happened, and this is no laughing matter and b) you're not Santa? Anyways, the link you provided only tries to prove that the death certificate copy, supposedly provided by Ponzer, was fake. We have no idea if this was even distributed by the state, no confirmation from the department of public health that this is indeed the certificate that was distributed. If Ponzer is a fraud, and not the father of the boy as the site claims, then there's no reason to believe this certificate has anything to do with the state of Connecticut. Also, why should we blindly believe Dennis Cimino? There's no mention of his credentials, and if he's even an expert in this field. He could've at least compared and contrasted this with a "real" death certificate so we can make up our own minds about the evidence, but alas...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apollonian Apollonius
May 22, 2015
+wiwille Queer: u can make up ur own mind in any case.
But where is ANY other alternative death cert., u amazing psychopathic scum?--and why did the "officials" at Newtown, then state of Conn., move to make that material secret fm the public?--it could ONLY be because they're conspiring criminals who typically work to keep public in dark over their criminal activities, PERIOD.
Besides, queer: NOTHING is going to change ur psychopathic mind, NOTHING--u're obviously determined to push forward w. NWO slavery and dicatatorship--it's why queers and Jews are scum, and why u MUST be exterminated.
No comments:
Post a Comment