See http://www.mootsf.com/index.php?/top...er/#entry52098
Posted Today, 11:52 AM
Now that I've established the actual, simple definition of racism, which is loyalty, it's good and necessary to further examine the metaphysics: racism is so essential and fundamental that everyone is now understood to be racist (hence loyal) to some race, hence culture.
Thus race understood (and defined), one is either loyal to a given race, say the "white" race (however it is defined), or by default, one is loyal to the amorphous, mixed-race--or perhaps to some specially defined mixed-race, say mulattoes or mestizos, for examples.
But the basic loyalty is axiomatic and necessary--one is loyal to some race whatever it might be--hence people are necessarily racist, the only question being to what race. Q.E.D.
* * * * * * * * * *
Thus observe the lie is given to the proposition held so sacredly by our metro-sexuals, as prevail upon this forum, that racism is "evil." For if it were true (about such "evil") then all humans are "evil" as they're racist (loyal).
"Evil," of course, is another subject, it being impossible as there is no perfectly "free" human will, humans being sinners (according to Christian precepts), humans pursuing pleasure, gain, and "happiness," and avoiding pain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Y_I_Otter, on 05 Jul 2013 - 14:25, said:
Rubbish. It's entirely possible to have universal respect and compassion for the members of any and all races. It's not even a new or particularly rare phenomenon. In the words of the ancient Roman playwright, Terrence, "Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto."-- "I am a human being, I consider nothing that is human alien to me."
* * * * * * * * * *
Ap replied:
Perhaps, but then again, there's reality: for LIFE IS WAR, according to all Western wise-men fm Homer, to Plato, St. Augustine, to Machiavelli, Hobbes, Darwin, Nietszche, Spencer, et al.
Christianity observes humans are sinners, and Greeks before them pt'd to the TRAGIC nature of life.
Hence one chooses for loyalty, for example, Christian TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) vs. Jew lies (JOHN 8:44). Thus all rational humanity is anti-semitic of necessity and by definition, Jews being Talmudists, by definition--see expo on Talmud at Come-and-hear.com and RevisionistReview.blogspot.com.
-----------------------------------------------------
Y_I_Otter, on 05 Jul 2013 - 15:01, said:
You do realise don't you, that the majority of the people you would term 'Jews' have never been in the same room with a copy of the Talmud, any more than you yourself have, much less order their lives according to its contents.
Furthermore, the vast majority of the people on the planet are neither Christian nor Jewish, and are therefore not bound by a single word the Bible, the Torah (or the Talmud) contain.
* * * * * * * * * *
[Commentary by ap in below-copied text, capped, bracketed. A.]
"You do realise don't you, that the majority of the people you would term 'Jews' [JEWS ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWERS OF TALMUD AND THEN THOSE RELATED GENETICALLY.]
"...have never been in the same room with a copy of the Talmud, [THIS BALDERDASH HAS BEEN HRD BEFORE MANY TIMES, AND THERE'S REALLY NO WAY FOR U TO KNOW THIS.]
"...any more than you yourself have, much less order their lives according to its contents. [FALSE, JEWS ARE WELL DEMONSTRATED--AND EVEN ADMIT THEMSELVES--THEY CARRY ON WAR AGAINST GENTILES, JEWS THE FOREMOST CRIMINALS, WELL-KNOWN AND ATTESTED IN HISTORY, BY ALL PEOPLES THROUGHOUT HISTORY. TALMUD IS JUST A WAR-PROGRAM AGAINST GENTILES--CK THE SOURCES I GAVE, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com and Come-and-hear.com.]
"Furthermore, the vast majority of the people on the planet are neither Christian nor Jewish, [PEOPLE GENERALLY STRUGGLE FOR LIFE AND TRUTH--THESE THEN ARE THE GENTILES, LED BY CHRISITAN HEROES AND SOLDIERS; JEWS ARE THE PSYCHOPATHIC MONSTERS, FOREMOST LIARS AND CRIMINALS--SUBJECTIVISTS, ETC., AS ALL HISTORY ATTESTS.]
"...and are therefore not bound by a single word the Bible, the Torah (or the Talmud) contain. [FALSE, CHRISTIAN NEW TEST. APPLIES AND PERTAINS TO ALL PEOPLE, TALMUD PERTAINING TO JEW CRIMINALS AND PSYCHOPATHS, THE OTHERS, LIKE METRO-SEXUALS, ET AL., ALLIED THEREWITH.]
----------------------------------------------------------
Y_I_Otter, on 05 Jul 2013 - 15:46, said:
If your only knowledge of Judaism comes from Hoffman's site or one like it, you're in for a rough ride when it comes to a reasoned discussion of the Talmud's contents. Hoffman's gone so far as to 'quote' from a tractate that doesn't exist in any known version of the Talmud. With blatant errors like that, I wouldn't trust anything a professional anti-Semite might have to say about Judaism.
* * * * * * * * *
Ap replied:
Well Otter, I happen to have read Hoffman's works, several of them--he's outstanding scholar. And u just gotta ask urself--WHO should one rather go-along with?--an accomplished scholar like Hoffman, or someone like u? Ho ho ho
U don't even have the wit to note the so-called "tractate" u speak of--just to demonstrate the quality of ur own "scholarship," such as it is. Forgive those of us who lack confidence in u, old chap.
Posted Today, 11:52 AM
Racism Is Axiomatic--U Cannot Not Be
Racist
(Apollonian, 5 Jul 13)
(Apollonian, 5 Jul 13)
Now that I've established the actual, simple definition of racism, which is loyalty, it's good and necessary to further examine the metaphysics: racism is so essential and fundamental that everyone is now understood to be racist (hence loyal) to some race, hence culture.
Thus race understood (and defined), one is either loyal to a given race, say the "white" race (however it is defined), or by default, one is loyal to the amorphous, mixed-race--or perhaps to some specially defined mixed-race, say mulattoes or mestizos, for examples.
But the basic loyalty is axiomatic and necessary--one is loyal to some race whatever it might be--hence people are necessarily racist, the only question being to what race. Q.E.D.
* * * * * * * * * *
Thus observe the lie is given to the proposition held so sacredly by our metro-sexuals, as prevail upon this forum, that racism is "evil." For if it were true (about such "evil") then all humans are "evil" as they're racist (loyal).
"Evil," of course, is another subject, it being impossible as there is no perfectly "free" human will, humans being sinners (according to Christian precepts), humans pursuing pleasure, gain, and "happiness," and avoiding pain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Y_I_Otter, on 05 Jul 2013 - 14:25, said:
Rubbish. It's entirely possible to have universal respect and compassion for the members of any and all races. It's not even a new or particularly rare phenomenon. In the words of the ancient Roman playwright, Terrence, "Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto."-- "I am a human being, I consider nothing that is human alien to me."
* * * * * * * * * *
Ap replied:
Perhaps, but then again, there's reality: for LIFE IS WAR, according to all Western wise-men fm Homer, to Plato, St. Augustine, to Machiavelli, Hobbes, Darwin, Nietszche, Spencer, et al.
Christianity observes humans are sinners, and Greeks before them pt'd to the TRAGIC nature of life.
Hence one chooses for loyalty, for example, Christian TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) vs. Jew lies (JOHN 8:44). Thus all rational humanity is anti-semitic of necessity and by definition, Jews being Talmudists, by definition--see expo on Talmud at Come-and-hear.com and RevisionistReview.blogspot.com.
-----------------------------------------------------
Y_I_Otter, on 05 Jul 2013 - 15:01, said:
You do realise don't you, that the majority of the people you would term 'Jews' have never been in the same room with a copy of the Talmud, any more than you yourself have, much less order their lives according to its contents.
Furthermore, the vast majority of the people on the planet are neither Christian nor Jewish, and are therefore not bound by a single word the Bible, the Torah (or the Talmud) contain.
* * * * * * * * * *
[Commentary by ap in below-copied text, capped, bracketed. A.]
"You do realise don't you, that the majority of the people you would term 'Jews' [JEWS ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWERS OF TALMUD AND THEN THOSE RELATED GENETICALLY.]
"...have never been in the same room with a copy of the Talmud, [THIS BALDERDASH HAS BEEN HRD BEFORE MANY TIMES, AND THERE'S REALLY NO WAY FOR U TO KNOW THIS.]
"...any more than you yourself have, much less order their lives according to its contents. [FALSE, JEWS ARE WELL DEMONSTRATED--AND EVEN ADMIT THEMSELVES--THEY CARRY ON WAR AGAINST GENTILES, JEWS THE FOREMOST CRIMINALS, WELL-KNOWN AND ATTESTED IN HISTORY, BY ALL PEOPLES THROUGHOUT HISTORY. TALMUD IS JUST A WAR-PROGRAM AGAINST GENTILES--CK THE SOURCES I GAVE, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com and Come-and-hear.com.]
"Furthermore, the vast majority of the people on the planet are neither Christian nor Jewish, [PEOPLE GENERALLY STRUGGLE FOR LIFE AND TRUTH--THESE THEN ARE THE GENTILES, LED BY CHRISITAN HEROES AND SOLDIERS; JEWS ARE THE PSYCHOPATHIC MONSTERS, FOREMOST LIARS AND CRIMINALS--SUBJECTIVISTS, ETC., AS ALL HISTORY ATTESTS.]
"...and are therefore not bound by a single word the Bible, the Torah (or the Talmud) contain. [FALSE, CHRISTIAN NEW TEST. APPLIES AND PERTAINS TO ALL PEOPLE, TALMUD PERTAINING TO JEW CRIMINALS AND PSYCHOPATHS, THE OTHERS, LIKE METRO-SEXUALS, ET AL., ALLIED THEREWITH.]
----------------------------------------------------------
Y_I_Otter, on 05 Jul 2013 - 15:46, said:
If your only knowledge of Judaism comes from Hoffman's site or one like it, you're in for a rough ride when it comes to a reasoned discussion of the Talmud's contents. Hoffman's gone so far as to 'quote' from a tractate that doesn't exist in any known version of the Talmud. With blatant errors like that, I wouldn't trust anything a professional anti-Semite might have to say about Judaism.
* * * * * * * * *
Ap replied:
Well Otter, I happen to have read Hoffman's works, several of them--he's outstanding scholar. And u just gotta ask urself--WHO should one rather go-along with?--an accomplished scholar like Hoffman, or someone like u? Ho ho ho
U don't even have the wit to note the so-called "tractate" u speak of--just to demonstrate the quality of ur own "scholarship," such as it is. Forgive those of us who lack confidence in u, old chap.
No comments:
Post a Comment