Grigg senses he cannot continue his dialectic, thus he must resort to pure censorship, knowing his "logic" now is too obviously, childishly absurd

[Grigg has here reached end-of-his-rope for dialectic, breaking off as he does, pathetic little worm who insists upon dictating to us white volk as to reality and "morality." A.]

* * * * *

Grigg, Non-White Inferior, Bereft Of Any Substantial Argument, Now Invokes Censorship, Obvious Last Resort

(Apollonian, 21 Jun 10)

Golly gee Grigg: what's ur problem?--I'm following our conversation/discussion of the racial topic quite well, I'd say--but it's u who wiggles and squirms like the fish trying to get free of proverbial hook--why NOT continue the thread right here? [See below-copied fm FreedomInOurTime.blogspot.com, "Quantum...," 15 Jun 10, comments.] There's surely no more appropriate place than here, obviously.

Indeed Grigg is desperate to break off the dialectic as he's in small child's sad position of denying evident reality, reduced to absurdity: issue is not necessarily "pure-blood" races--but simply RACE itself.

Grigg now, aside fm trying to evade holohoax lies issue, wants to prejudice the issue of race by means of attacking the red-herring phrase "pure-blood." Obviously, establishing race itself as something of integral identity must suffice for "pure-blood," the two essentially then the same.

Grigg, like the squirming Talmudist and Jew, wants to fudge, fudge, fudge the issue(s) and every part thereto any way he can in order to win his pt., pretending he, a non-white by his own admission, is now father of a white person--talk about hysterical, obsessive "mono-mania."

Thence Grigg tries "turning tables," accusing me of subjectivism. But in affirming evident and widely agreed-upon reality of race (thus for practical purposes, "pure-blood"), founded solidly in sense-perception of all people, even of different race, I consider I heed to that common, objective reality of all rational folk--it's Grigg who exerts and expresses his own petulant subjectivism. Let the reading audience decide--which Grigg wants to prevent by means of censorship expressed in his typical, usual, smug, patronizing manner.

Grigg's hatred of white folk and their rationalist culture, founded in objectivity, is most expressed in this fatuous smugness and patronizing manner of Grigg's.

Bereft for any substantive argument of his own, Grigg now must attack style of expression, pretending a lack of "intelligibility"--but his desperate child's arguments and evasions only prove my statements are perfectly intelligible--and that Grigg cannot handle them.

And "Phenotypes" are not same as race, Grigg, but merely an outer manifestation, half the genes always hidden in recessivity. Jews then are race of people following a culture (Talmudism) which must, at least eventually, at some pt., necessarily express itself in some unique fashion, making members of that race similar to one another, dis-similar to anyone else--all in accord w. common-sense notions of race, verified fm dictionary--those descended fm common ancestors, peculiar to them alone, Q.E.D.

So once again Grigg: it's we whites (u know who/what we are, perfectly well) who are the natives and citizens of USA and its Constitution--u're just a mascot, quite literally, w. presumptuous delusions of grandeur, practically insisting u're whiter than white itself, in ur absurd way, so fatuously moralistic which now must resort to sheer pontifical censorship.

For a race of people are those differentiated fm others beginning in physical features, race obviously descended fm common ancestors peculiar to them, consummated then in CULTURE.

And culturally, u, Mr. Grigg, are a gross anomaly against white Americans, the REAL Americans, without the slightest doubt, insisting arbitrarily to ur peculiar declarations regarding race--against the plain facts and against all human reason, usage, and convention, pretending as u do to being holier-than-thou, Grigg the sole arbiter, without reference, sense, or reason.

CONCLUSION: It's ur blog, Grigg, go ahead and censor my dialectic--quite stupid in view of previous entries, though--but then again, necessary in view of ur now desperate situation for logic, sense, and facts. U only thus prove what extreme enemy of the native white people and their culture u really are--and the great necessity and virtue for heeding to strictest racial loyalty. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

---------------above by Ap in response to below-copied--------------


William N. Grigg said...
Grigg: why were u let go fm New American?--do u think it was, at least partially, ur persistent publication/affirmation of holohoax lies?

You should take up that question with Jack McManus, who sees the world much as you do. This would be a challenging conversation, since it is as difficult for Jack to tell the truth as it is for you to write intelligibly (is it even possible to converse in texting shorthand?).

Jews are NOT "white" Mr. Grigg--no more than mestizos and mulattos--u already admitted ur wife is Jew or part Jew

There are Jews of every conceivable phenotype, from fair-skinned, blonde-over-blue to mahogany-hued Ethiopians. I'm surprised that someone as monomaniacal on the subject as yourself would miss that rather large and obvious fact.

"white" is an abstraction, hence it requires definition--thus for it to have any real meaning "white" cannot have any part non-white--otherwise everything is "white" but for pure-blood non-white, obviously.

You're not describing an abstraction, but rather a figment of imagination. There is no such thing as ethnic purity -- outside of a handful of severely isolated enclaves (and then only dubiously within them). Defining one's worldview with reference to a mythical abstraction is a symptom of incurable subjectivism, is it not?

Tell you what: Rather than replying on this thread, why don't you hang out your own cyber-shingle and dispense your insights, such as they are, in that forum?
June 20, 2010 5:46 PM