* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Alex Jones: Hero Of Lower-Level Jews
(Apollonian, 5 Feb 14)
That's excellent question (see below), indubitably. And remember Jews are quite psycho, so it isn't too easy analyzing how their minds work. Note Jews--not only "Zionists"--control the money-machine/-weapon/-instrument, the Fed, and thus both "left" (homosexuals, et al.) and "right" (the neo-cons and Judeo-Christian hereticalists). Further yet, observe some Jews & zionists also want to "influence" such as Rand Paul and the Libertarians, don't forget--Jews got ALL THE MONEY, it seems, unfortunately.
JOnes could well be thought-of as "limited-hangout," but there's no doubt in my mind that Jones himself is sincere--he's an idiot, in a certain way, for this brainless Jew-worship on which he's been weaned fm early age by his Judeo-Christian family, don't doubt.
My guess is Jews--at least some or enough of them--are satisfied Jones pt.s away fm Jews and never fails to idolize Jews, vilifying Nazis, etc.
Remember another thing: Jones is always and seriously (he genuinely believes in it) pushing this "good-evil" prop.--which is part of Jews' necessary rationale and mentality--don't u want to be "good," and so thought of by others?--well then, u should be "tolerant" and not "anti-Semitic." So all Jews, including the master-minds, appreciate Jones for this Pharisaist prop. regarding "good-evil."
So Jones provides a significant cultural appeal which is quasi-religious for the "good-evil" proposition which would otherwise be laughed-at if it was pushed by outright religious and Judeo-Christians.
Thus "harm and good" needs to be understood regarding (a) Jews, specifically, and (b) the more general situation regarding what we'd call "big-bro." Regarding (a), Jones is surely immaculate and outstanding, but regarding (b), Jews consider it's quite expedient that Jones deflects fm the Jews, as if there are other significant powers responsible.
Remember Jews--esp. the lower-level ones (sociologically)--actually believe it is someone else doing the dirty-work (like "Islamics," and "anti-semites"), and these Jews got money--they're ones pushing Ron and Rand Paul, pretending they (Jews) are thus loyal to people in general--fellow American citizens, etc. Top Jews surely consider and calculate if they clamped-down too much on the lower-level Jews, it wouldn't work nearly as well as things are working so far--that's how Alex gets by like he does (I think).
So it seems weird, perhaps, but Alex is sincere, and does creditably warning against the "globalists"--he just leaves-out the Jews--only the top-level Jews don't like the part about "globalists" and are made nervous thereby. Lower-level Jews love Alex--even though Alex does such good job (as he does) against globalists. I hope this analysis makes sense.
---------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------------
Timothy Fitzpatrick
/ February 5, 2014
Fair enough, but do you really think Alex’s Zionist handlers would allow him to go on if he were really doing more good than harm? And what has Alex done in over a dozen years of leading the patriot movement? What have any of Alex’s listeners done? Nothing has been accomplished other than all of us being made subconsciously comfortable with tyranny.
