Book Review of Atzmon's "Being in Time"--he's a Jew, but a dissident, and it's interesting, informative to see his view-pt....

Book Review: Atzmon's "Being In Time"
A Jew Dissident's View--Interesting, But Still--Never Trust A Jew
(Apollonian, 15 Dec 17)

Gilad Atzmon, author of "Being in Time, A Post-Political Manifesto," Skyscraper Publications; Bloxham, Ox (UK, evidently); 2017; ix, 212 pp. text, is a somewhat famous Jew dissenter--he takes a dim view of Israel and its horrific mis-treatment of the people of Palestine (and others too). So it's interesting what he says about this dissent of his, and note it's unusual, this sort of dissent among Jews, who are notoriously collectivistic, hence sympathetic towards one another. We additionally find Atzmon has quite a strange understanding of Judaism, to extent he understands it at all, which not understanding (fully) actually is necessary to upholding and excusing it, such monstrous Judaism, but fact remains he is still quite a Jew for the overall grasp of things in general, as for "world-view." So it's an interesting pt. of view we get fm Atzmon, we observing upon this Jew's observations and analysis. Atzmon actually makes a valiant effort, and we get a genuinely interesting, even somewhat informative product. And we note fm Atzmon Jews will always be Jews, at least in significant ways.

Thus Atzmon begins for reference w. Francis Fukuyama's "End of History..." (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_En...d_the_Last_Man), famous CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) interpreter of history who/which pretends to be definitive--at least for Atzmon--history and human-kind debouching so cheerfully to (genocidal) world gov. Immediately however, we find Atzmon's grasp of "capitalism" as economic system is as muddled and lacking as Fukuyama's, evidently, but it's supposedly diff. fm socialism, though it isn't clear exactly how--typical confusion for lack of clear definitions--and Atzmon thus shows he's same sort of victim to such muddledness and lack of clarity.

It's interesting Atzmon faults Fukuyama for his own lack of clarity, while Atzmon fails to see he's equally and similarly lacking. Yet Atzmon accurately says people of West have been reduced to mere "consumers," rather zombie-like, rather than real "players" who have rights which are respected by governments. But Atzmon (and Fukuyama) doesn't grasp it's far worse than reduction to "consumers": we the people are actually being exterminated--mass-murdered--though by slow-kill methods, per Alex Jones (InfoWars.com), as by poison vaccines, poison GMO foods, poison "chem-trails," etc., all in accord w. Agenda 21 and 2030.

Thus Atzmon observes the rise of practical fascism which was what "liberalism" and "democracy" gradually morphed into as we saw post WWI and the 20s and 30s--even though the corrupt, "liberal" West (France, UK, and USA) thought they were better than outright fascist Germany, Italy, and Spain--who actually were desperately defending against outright bolshevism as of upstart Russia which was subsidized by West, esp. USA under globalist, socialist FDR (Roosevelt). Atzmon goes into some detail rather lampooning the homosexual degeneration of the West, in guise of idiot, pretended "liberalism." Atzmon doesn't realize he's simply describing the submergence of Western culture into SATANISM (gross, evermore extreme subjectivism), fueled by gross hubris.

It's interesting atheists and Jews can't take seriously the idea of satanism, seeming to think satanism is "religious" when it isn't--satanism is sublimely PHILOSOPHIC, extreme subjectivism, the idea reality is mere creation of one's own consciousness/mentality, making oneself God, the creator. And the usual pretext to this satanism/subjectivism is the insistence/obsession w. non-existent "good-evil," always beginning in childhood for the people.

So after Atzmon's somewhat tedious litany of observations, all of them questionable, at best, even if interesting in their way, like about the varying styles of cinematography of film directors, like Spielberg vs. Tarantino, the Jew historian, Yuri Slezkine is brought up, Atzmon holding Slezkine is definitive for the Judaization of degenerate Western culture--which really makes a lot of sense. Atzmon further notes this Judaization is not a good thing, why?--because Judaic culture itself is questionable, citing work of historian, Shlomo Sands, who pt.s out problems of Jew historical narrative and how it's so made-up and actually fictional.

Thus the problem and defect for establishment political dialectic of the present Judaized age of the West, according to Atzmon, is it's totally Jew-oriented and -controlled btwn the "leftists" on one hand, Jews, G. Soros and Noam Chomsky, and on the other, the Jew "capitalists," led by A. Greenspan and Goldman Sachs--all Jew, all the time. At the end of his book, Atzmon recommends the best course is to heed to the notion of Jew sociologist, Leo Strauss, who, more plausibly for Atzmon, cites the dialectic btwn Godly Jerusalem and rationalist Athens.

So personally, I find Atzmon's analysis to be note-worthy, even if somewhat tedious, and actually informative and even rewarding. For Atzmon is absolutely right about some important things like the Judaization of the general culture, including establishment political dialectic. We the people, esp. gentiles, do indeed need the spirit of Athens, but especially Aristotle and that dear, original Christianity (Christ = truth, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), esp. for it's distinct anti-Semitism (lies, JOHN 8:44).

Note Atzmon so much fails for basic observations and definitions, beginning w. Judaism--it's Talmudism (see Talmudical.blogspot.com and Come-and-hear.com), and SUBJECTIVISM of extreme sort--SATANISM--by which one makes oneself God the creator, consciousness the creator of reality. Jews rule over the satanic, degenerate West because Jews are most collectivistic for their subjectivism, Jews most organized and cohesive political entity (a). (b) Beyond this basic abstract philosophy, note Jews control the central-banking system, legalized counterfeiting, the imposition of CURRENCY fraud in place of a real, genuine MONEY system, real money being commodity-based, the best being gold/silver (see Mises.org for expo on money-banking).

(c) Finally, Atzmon largely fails for the best cultural-historic analytical frame-work, the CYCLIC theory of history, as Spengler's "Decline of the West," by which a culture first arises due to the "Athenian" objective orientation, reaches a peak, and then "declines" in subjectivism, hubris, moralism, and satanism, as we see, the worst enemy of truth (= Christ) being the non-existent, Pharisaic, Pelagian heresy of "good-evil."

So in analysis of Atzmon and his problematic, but still useful work, one can credit him for an honest and genuinely informative effort: he makes enough observations with enough accuracy to be able to compare it for the most part against the best theory, as of Spengler's CYCLIC theory. What we really need is a Christian-inspired resurrection and resuscitation of culture, as of St. Constantine the Great, for that Greek/Aristotelian objectivity and rationalist rule-of-law--against the present degeneration and satanism led, dominated, and organized by Jews.