Ho ho ho--got the below missive fm "Anthony" at RealCurrencies.wordpress.com. Anthony is a clone of Bill Still at MoneyMasters.com, someone who'd like to replace the present US Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) COUNTERFEIT scam w. something that would not be privately owned, and wouldn't charge interest on "loans." Ho ho ho ho
Apollonian, You're behaving like an ass, so I've deleted your last few comments.
Please do not comment again, until you show some respect to what others have to say and until you get a basic grasp of what is under discussion at RC, so you can add to the exchange of ideas, instead of trying to take over the show without the goodies to make it worth while to the visitors of RC. Thanks, Anthony
* * * * * *
So I wrote back to the little bastard:
Anyone who disagrees w. ur sadly deluded ideas about legalized COUNTERFEITING (which is all u're advocating--u just want to leave out the charging-of-interest and have the counterfeiting done by gov. instead of by private interests as it's now being done, as by the Fed) u now call names, like the ignorant, frustrated child u really are.
"[A] basic grasp of what is under discussion"?--u advocate legalized COUNTERFEITING, pure and simple, as I've noted--u're just not bright enough to understand and admit the obvious truth, ho ho ho ho ho ho.
U pretend falsely that commodity money doesn't work, even though u're refuted by simple history, aside fm exposure of ur fallacious logic. There's no shortage of commodity money, as if/when quantity in circulation goes down, buying-power goes up--what's ur problem?
Further, u can't seem to grasp that ur moronic ideas about COUNTERFEITING have been tried before in history, and failed, as I noted--u just ignore reality.
And I assure u, u and ur buddies have received precisely the proper respect u so richly deserve: u babble nonsense, don't understand basic meanings of words (esp. the meaning of usury--which is not just charging of interest), u ignore easily referenced history--and now, as we see, u censor anyone who disagrees w. u in substantial manner.
"[W]orthwhile to the visitors of RC"?--ho ho ho--HOW would u know anything about that?--do u think u're engaged in some wishful thinking? Ur buddies and visitors deserve u making an honest attempt to treat, discuss, and rebut the comments that don't agree w. ur babbling nonsense. But u're not capable of substantial dialectic, so, like all children, weaklings, and losers, u resort to censorship, ho ho ho hoo--and that's not my problem, comrade. Good luck.
* * * * * * * *
Ck out the blog at http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2013/11/25/socialism-is-not-the-answer-to-capitalism/. Little bastard actually left some of my comments up, ho ho ho ho ho ho
No comments:
Post a Comment