Anti-Christ pretender to being "American" analyzed for his evermore psychotic lying, schizoidism....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://americansjourney.blogspot.com...l#comment-form

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JR's Irrationality, Question-Begging, Noted, Detailed, Analyzed
(Apollonian, 30 Dec 15)

U continue to repeat urself (see below-copied), but let me pt.-out just a couple of theses of urs to which I object and consider to be miserably flawed.

(a) FM just above, "These have become intangibles which are further diluted by our propaganda machine which is at the heart of the destruction of what is good and right in the nation."

It isn't really so much the "prop. machine," for that could otherwise easily be counter-acted, but rather it's what underlies: that central-banking, legalized COUNTERFEITING which makes the prop. machine so powerful, effective, un-rivaled, as by any competition.

Federal Reserve Bank is private corp. holding a legalist monopoly for "creating credit," thus currency, given to those criminals totally illegally and un-Constitutionally by their flunkies holding office, taking an illegal "vote." For if u removed the prop. machine, but not the central-bank, the bank would instantly create the credit/currency to setting up another "prop. machine."

And I explained this (foregoing) to u NUMEROUS times, but u are PSYCHOTICALLY dense and impervious to pertinent facts. I wouldn't say u were stupid--rather psychotic--the only proper term for what is the obvious fact.

(b) "I've explained to you that the way for people to get along is to agree on certain values then stick to them - that is law."

U're talking about "CIVIL" law, and that, including the Constitution, is merely what rides the SURFACE of the culture, merely reflecting MORE BASIC values of the people and their concepts of the natural law foundation to it all.

And I explained to u, in detail, NUMEROUS times how and why Christian culture affects people's basic philosophy and sense of natural law, thus and thereby giving rise to that surface, civil law tradition, following Greek logic, Roman law, Germanic and then English Common law, etc.

And these, foregoing, are all dependent upon the OBJECTIVE reality and people's concept thereof, as I noted--opposed then by satanist and Jew SUBJECTIVISM which they excuse on premise of false, non-existent "good-evil," destroying the Christian foundation, hence the civil law and general rule-of-law, as I pt'd out, numerous times.

"Does a Jew get a free pass for speeding on the interstate?"--answer is yes he does, evermore, and including, evermore, his masonic and associated buddies. For the Jew mentality, religion, and culture encourages SUBJECTIVISM, etc., as I noted numerous times, explaining how and why, giving the instances fm history, etc.

(c) "Are you going to point me to a book that says I shouldn't believe my own lying eyes like people I personally know try to tell me?"

Well, science is logic applied, by definition, by which the sense-perception is ultimately used as criterion and hence verifying agent of any theoretic propositions, and proper scholarly referencing is designed for precisely this sort of scientific verification. Proper scholarship = science, and is consistent therewith. But u're right about there being a lot of fraud involved in scholarship, a lot of trickery often attempted, BUT the basic principle remains, and it only demands one be learned and skilled for scholarship, as for science.

It isn't acceptable that one pt.s to an instance of fraudulent scholarship and then uses that as excuse for moronic assertion without substantiation--which is what u do far too often.

(d) "If Christianity is the answer why is this place so f'd up?

"You can only blame others for your problems.

"My issues are very temporary. It is the failings of Christians that is to blame for the woes of America - if indeed they are to thank for this mess we have.
Being "Christian" doesn't give anyone a free pass for anything."

And I've actually agreed w. parts of ur above quote here, surely dozens of times, by now, in all the blogs and all my entries and postings therein.

'Christianity the answer'?--I've mostly referenced dear Christianity for its philosophy, and I've noted also the problems. For u to say that I simplistically just insist without further comment or discussion that 'Christianity is the answer' IS A LIE. For I've taken pains to pt. out the problems and the relation of Christian people and Christian philosophy properly understood.

I could go on, BUT I ALREADY HAVE DONE SO (going on, about the Christian issue), and I'm tired of ur stupid, PSYCHOTIC, obsessive lying about the Christian issue, buddy.

What u complain about regarding Christianity I submit is no diff. fm logic in general. People profess to being logical, and understanding it, but do they always follow it properly, sufficiently?--well, same goes for Christian principles, which I've demonstrated, showing, for example, how the Christian differs RADICALLY fm the Jew, which difference u continue to ignore--but that's not my fault.

So again, I consider I'm quite well justified for my complaints and observations upon ur evermore insufferable question-begging and lying--to the pt. of actual psychosis, which is what I was referring to, having specific examples as proof and demonstration.

---------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------

Anonymous Dec 30, 2015, 9:04:00 AM

Apsterian,
And finally - I don't like to comment on whether or not I've visited certain sites or not that may have been referenced because I try to avoid many online traps I've fallen for - and I've fallen for just about every one there is.
I've explained to you that the way for people to get along is to agree on certain values then stick to them - that is law. You want me to study the Talmud and other materials - where I don't think that is the way to the answer.
If someone is breaking the law it doesn't matter what their belief system is. That goes especially for traffic court. Does a Jew get a free pass for speeding on the interstate? Does a Christian get a free pass for speeding on the interstate?

There are unproductive suggestions at times -and I think reading about the evil ideas of monsters is OK once in a while - but my focus is on the preservatioin of what it is that makes America great.

These have become intangibles which are further diluted by our propaganda machine which is at the heart of the destruction of what is good and right in the nation.

When your own law enforcement seems to be part of the means of destruction of rights - why go around in circles "studying it?"

Chemtrails are another perfect example. I have seen them - have you? Are you going to point me to a book that says I shouldn't believe my own lying eyes like people I personally know try to tell me? Think about what I am saying - WHAT IS THERE TO QUOTE ANYMORE?

So for now these rants are about all there is to do - the contradictions available are where the truth is under present highly limited circumstances.
JR

Amazingly intricate, detailed discussion is actually quite useful useful, appropriate for present situation....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://bellofchurch.blogspot.com/201...l#comment-form

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Intricate Discussion Quite Useful, Well-Founded
(Apollonian, 26 Dec 15)

This was incredibly intricate, detailed discussion on a fine pt. of what's properly understood as literature. The whole pt. of New Test. is to deliver a theologic lesson to Pharisees and Jews who'd ruined the original Torah, Christ figure now re-stating and clarifying for folks, but esp. the Judeans (NOT NOT NOT NOT merely and only "Jews," defined as followers of Pharisees, according to Hoffman, Talmudical.blogspot.com).

Of course historical accuracy is necessary for good literature, but New Test. was not meant as history, except as precedent for New Test. theology. And the lesson of New Test. is to emphasize TRUTH (= Christ) IS ONLY WAY TO GOD, in accord w. most philosophic Gosp. JOHN 14:6. Equally important then is the philosophic lesson for emphasis upon OBJECTIVITY, hence Aristotle, as the necessary basis/premise/criterion for such truth.

Finally, the ethics follows fm truth and hence honesty, Christ teaching by example, showing the way, treating people as children, members of the flock, the leaders charged, as was St. Peter, w. "feeding" the "lambs" of Christ.

Hence the CORE of Christianity and its philosophy is that Christ = truth, and it's something anyone and everyone can easily agree upon. Presently we suffer fm "Tower of Babel" syndrome within a satanically hubristic society collapsing now among false prophets, the present Roman "Vatican" especially prominent among them. Thanks again for ur excellent discussion; it won't be lost for the many worthwhile pt.s u made and elucidated for us.

Happiness?--it's matter of management of emotions within CYCLIC history, also rhetoric for Christian vs. satanism....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://bellofliberty.blogspot.com/20...l-to-cory.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Happiness?--It's Matter Of Successful Management Of Spenglerian CYCLIC "Decline Of West," Rhetoric, Hence Christian Vs. Satanism
(Apollonian, 20 Dec 15)

It would seem ur conversation w. respondent has quite degenerated as predicted, respondent defending and justifying the murderous and disastrous aggression of the Northern states in the 1860s war--it's supposedly "justified" as it's MORAL.

And as predicted, the discussion of the 1860s war foundered on issues of slavery and morality, the southerners lacking "feeling" for their fellow humans, the simple issue of Constitutional contract just ignored. Lincoln successfully persuaded the people, enough of them, they were threatened by and attacked by southerners--it was a triumph of rhetoric by Lincoln, persuading the northern folk of their moral superiority.

So once again we see issues of simplest fact being trumped by "morality"--as they so often are. Thus the Spenglerian thesis about CYCLIC history is demonstrated, the culture being corrupted fm the original, initial honesty of the founders who had to work and fight, now betrayed by the effete, indulgent inheritors of following generations who super-impose moralism, trumping facts, indulging moralist hubris, pretending to "good."

And we thus observe continued expansion of world government/dictatorship idea founded upon moralism, ignoring the now emerging facts regarding deliberate creation of ISIS terror group by USA, NATO, Israel, and Saudi in illegal attempt to overthrow Syrian President Assad, none of this being discussed by present candidates running for office due to their dependence upon Jews and the money-power which just legally COUNTERFEITS-up all the money for practical purposes which they demand. See Mises.org and RealityZone.com for expo on central-banking.

Hence it's demonstrated once again the uselessness of arguing w. moralists, moralism always serving as their excuse for trumping logic and facts of reality. For it's truly a contest btwn the two versions of reality, (a) Aristotelian objectivity and thus determinism (absolute cause-effect), there being no "good-evil"; (b) The other Platonist-inspired idea being subjectivism and hubristic assumption of a "free" human will capable of creating reality in God-like fashion.

And there's just not much to be done regarding these moralistic fools: they don't respect or recognize rules of logic or existence of facts; they just want to feel "good" about themselves as "good" people who "chose" wisely. And the inexorable proliferation of these moralistic sort are why/how cultures "decline" in CYCLIC fashion--over-population of fools. Thus human life is so much mere matter of management of this CYCLIC process described so well by Oswald Spengler.

Thus the CHRISTIAN solution to this problem of culture is in successfully characterizing the hubristic moralists as SATANISTS and thereupon making use of people's natural prejudice against this satanism founded in subjectivism and hereticalist "good-evil."

The cultural struggle against satanic hubris become one of rhetoric, and the satanists have the advantage of central-banking which legally COUNTERFEITS-up all the currency by which to buy-up all the organs of propaganda and dis-info. So Christian rhetoric cannot be too careful. In the end, Christian rhetoric must fit the circumstances as satanists are impelled to defeating themselves.

Knight's magnificent work on masonic murder, conspiracy: a window into politics and history....

Book Review: Stephen Knight's "Jack the Ripper: the Final Solution"
A Case-Study Of Masonic Conspiracy
(Apollonian, 21 Dec 15)

Stephen Knight's work, "Jack the Ripper: the Final Solution"; David McKay Co. Inc.; NY; 1975; 284 pp, 264 text, Bibliography, Index; is brilliant--a veritable masterpiece of--investigative journalism which well serves history as it tells the story of the mysterious "Ripper" murders of London's Whitechapel district in late 1888 fm the end August to early November, a period of just over two months. For it was strictly a masonic operation, and there were at least a couple of killers in collusion, who did the work, over-seen by free-masons, of five women who happened to be prostitutes. The prostitutes were killed by the masons for specific purpose of covering-up and responding to the attempted blackmail by the prostitutes over the secret marriage of, and birth of a daughter to, the son of the English Prince of Wales at the time, Prince Albert Victor, nick-named "Eddy," son of Albert Edward, who became King Edward VII after the death of his mother, Queen Victoria, in 1901.

Albert Victor himself, "Eddy," who was not involved in the murders, died fairly soon after the "ripper" killings, in 1892, of influenza and pneumonia. It is, however, quite possible, though not certain, that the Prince of Wales, Albert Edward, did know of the murders as he was a member and highest ranking titular Freemason of England. After all, how stupid could the Prince of Wales have been?

Thus Eddy (Albert Victor) seems to have been un-distinguished, not an outstanding student in school, and also rather dis-liked by his father, evidently. So his mother, Alexandra, decided to rather apprenticing-out her son to an artist she had known fm Denmark, her place of birth and original family, the artist being one of the more notable and accomplished at the time in England, one Walter Sickert, absolutely central to this story, investigation, and book by Knight. Eddy then soon enough fell in love w. a girl who worked in a nearby shop to Sickert's studio, and who sat as model for the artist, named Annie Elizabeth Crook. Eddy and Annie, who was Catholic, got married in secret, and had a daughter, Alice Margaret.

The author, Stephen Knight, obtained the basic facts of the story, amazingly accurate, fm the son of the artist, Joseph Sickert, who had been told much of the story by his father, Walter, who had subsequently, after some years, married the royally-descended daughter, Alice Margaret, who was the mother of Joseph. The facts related to the author, Knight, by Joseph turned-out to be uncannily precise for all the details and verification when Knight thereupon investigated and discovered yet further info, amazing facts, including the un-covering by Knight of the masons and their plots regarding this "ripper" episode.

For not surprisingly, at the time in the later 1880s, word had gotten out about the business of the Duke of Clarence (Eddy), and the Queen herself called in the Prime Minister, Lord Salisbury, to have the matter taken-care of, as there were quite serious political implications which the author, Knight explains for us. So Salisbury, who was a mason, the masons being extremely powerful in all truth, simply hired and/or commissioned a group of people, these being headed by other masons, evidently, to have Eddy and Annie kid-napped, Eddy to be thereupon placed under strict royal supervision, though Annie, quite cruelly was sequestered, at first in a hospital mental institute and later in various work-houses, perhaps even drugged and lobotomized, though it isn't clear, by the masonic surgeon who was placed in charge, Sir William Gull, physician to the Queen, and who'd done work for the royals in the way of otherwise illegal abortions. Gull was also adept at having un-cooperative people institutionalized in mental wards as Annie was. Poor, hapless Annie, who drifted in and out of various work-houses (similar, evidently to present-day homeless shelters) finally died in 1920, reputedly insane, but this wasn't the only tragedy of this sad and horrible episode.

Somehow, Walter Sickert said he never found-out exactly how, but evidently, the nanny and child, Alice Margaret, escaped the incident of the kid-napping of Eddy and Annie, and the nanny, a friend of Annie, named Mary Jane Kelly, also one (the final) of the victims of the "ripper," was able to return the child to Sickert who then placed the child in care of his relatives. Unfortunately, in the interim, Mary Jane had fallen-in w. some prostitutes prone to drinking who decided to try to blackmail the royals, or someone close thereto, according to Sickert, and their fate was sealed. For Dr. Gull as mason and practiced, though sublime, criminal soon enough contracted the help of fellow high-ranking masons of the London Police, and the prostitutes were ruthlessly located and hunted-down--so ruthlessly, in fact, that one of the Ripper victims, a woman named Catherine Eddowes, was not actually connected w. the others but was mistaken for Mary Kelly due to her calling herself by the last name of the man she lived-with, a man un-related but w. the same name of Kelly. It seems the prostitutes, w. two exceptions, were poisoned by Gull first, then mutilated later according to masonic ceremony which entails dis-embowelment in event forbidden secrets are divulged.

The great virtue of Knight's investigative work on this "Ripper" episode is his side-inquiry, but quite significant in itself, upon the masons and their sort of nefarious operations which extended fm the medical profession and the police, politicians, lawyers, and even to high-ranking members of the Church of England. For the cover-up for this "ripper" episode was extensive, but still not un-observed in various ways. The cover-up included not only the police process, but also the legally mandated medical inquests upon the murders themselves and the curious ways info was suppressed fm the public though still well-enough known among upper circles. For example, enough evidence was known about Dr. Gull that he was eventually removed fm his practice of medicine by his fellow physicians who, though many were masons themselves, were no doubt quite appalled at the grisly work done by Gull. When Gull died, his estate was positively stupendous, over 300,000 pounds (amounting to many millions of dollars in today's currency) and other properties.

And Knight is to be commended for his extensive research, not only upon the killings and the masons, but also on the other writing and work done upon the "ripper" episode, so lurid and notorious in the public mind. Knight goes into detail about the work, life, and paintings of the artist, Walter Sickert who was so terribly affected by the murders. The great wonder is the masons themselves have come away fm the episode w. so little publicity and notoriety when, obviously, they really deserve quite a bit more. And of course, the reason for such successful cover-up of the masons is it would have led to the royals and the rest of the ruling class society which so much depends upon and makes use of this nefarious and criminal network as Knight, the author, makes clear for us.

Knight's expositions make clear masonic notoriety and dis-repute is well-earned and -deserved. For once the mason reaches the Royal Arch degree we discover the mason's greatest loyalty shifts fm society and nation for the lower degrees, now only to fellow masons, keeping their secrets and covering for them, even if the secret involves criminal violations of law and national security. And the success of the masons can be judged by the confusion and ignorance of the public and the continuing respect held for the masons to this day, the "ripper" episode so much hidden in lurid rumor and legend, so few even beginning to suspect the masons for their responsibility, secretiveness, and criminal contempt for the public.

Another tragedy of this masonic "ripper" episode regarded the child of the secret marriage, little Alice Margaret, who was targeted by one of the accomplices to the masons, though perhaps not a mason himself, who had operated a coach service, at first for the young prince, Albert Victor when he made his forays into London to be with his mentor and artist friend, Sickert, then later for the murderer, Gull. Though escaping death, little Alice was twice struck down in the streets by this coach-driver, a man by name of John Netley, and once, the first time, she was nearly killed, taking months in the hospital to recover. The second time wasn't as bad, though she was knocked unconscious. Interestingly, Netley lived a few more years until 1903 when, at age 43, he died somewhat strangely, suffering a fractured skull fm a road accident. The author, Knight, wonders if it wasn't yet another masonic murder for purpose of removing a witness.

Finally, we learn the last secret of this horrific episode regarding masonic murder and conspiracy having to do w. the artist, Walter Sickert, who simply knew too much detail about the murders not to have been involved himself, according to the author, Knight, though of course it's impossible to completely verify, the details and reasoning, however, are related by Knight.

Thus when one applies this "ripper" episode to history and the yr. 1888, it's much less of a wonder, for example, when considering circumstances of the public murder of JFK (Pres. Kennedy) in 1963 and the other murders of the 1960s, Malcolm X, MLK, and RFK, just for a few examples, there being many more and others. Thus history, historians, and sociologists owe a great debt to our journalistic investigator, Mr. Stephen Knight, who thereby helps us so tremendously for seeing how things really work and happen both then in 1888 and now. For note the only alternative to conspiracy theory is accident excuse--"coincidence," golly gee. For if a society loses the genuine Christian character, the only thing that gains is hubris and satanism by which one makes oneself God upon pretext of "good-evil" and perfectly "free" human will.

Despite all the psycho-babble, the greatest error in thinking is fallacious Pharisaism and "good-evil"....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://www.blacklistednews.com/5_%E2...38/38/Y/M.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

By Far, Without Doubt, Greatest Fallacy Is Pharisaist "Good-Evil"; Non-Existent "Good" Greatest Enemy Of Truth
(Apollonian, 22 Dec 15)

Hohoho ho ho ho--what a brainless bunch of psycho-babble and idiotic twaddle, ho ho ho ho.  See article at above link.

Greatest problem is what it's always been, HUBRIS: the idea one has a perfectly "free," God-like will capable of changing reality, and this obtains especially in the way of moralism and "good-evil," Pharisaism, and known to Christian theology as Pelagianism (see St. Augustine).

And of course, hubris follows fm idea that reality is subjective, non-objective--they go together, actually, hubris and subjectivism. Following objectivity, fm Aristotle, we find reality is determined, in accord w. absolute cause-effect--what Christians call "God's will"--there's no perfectly "free" human will.

Thus the fascists, following Plato, cleverly put-over the idea of "good-evil" which so many stupid people become so absolutely addicted to, thus becoming the obedient soldiers and drones of fascists. And masses of stupid folks arise naturally as society "succeeds" and "prospers," ho ho ho ho ho. The trick is to get the fools addicted to "good-evil" at early age; they're perfect slaves ever after.

Thus the way to taking-over and ruling is persuading the masses of morons it's "good" to institute central-banking--legalized COUNTERFEITING (see Mises.org). Once u have this central-banking, u rule--which proceeded in West slowly, but became definitive w. Rothschild dominance of banking after Napoleonic wars which USA failed to resist, becoming captive definitively soon after war of 1860s, properly known as War of Northern Aggression, definitive destruction of original Constitutional system.

Finally, by way of demonstrating my thesis, note aforementioned War of Northern Aggression can NEVER be discussed for obvious destruction of Constitution, esp. 10th Amendment, as the moralistic issue is ALWAYS intruded, specifically slavery, which totally hijacks EVERY discussion without fail. Such is the horror of fallacious, delusionary, non-existent "good-evil."

Trump is attractive for his style which stands-out fm the rest, even though they all suck-along w. Jews....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://americansjourney.blogspot.com...l#comment-form

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Trump Is Throw-Back To National Sovereignty Idea, Don't Doubt
(Apollonian, 17 Dec 15)

They (the powers) actually hiked int. rates today by whopping .25 of a percentage--but that is enough, many say, to POP the bubble blown-up by mad money-printing that's been going-on.

It's got to pop at some time anyway, they say; if not then we're just going to get HYPER-inflation which is worst of all.

Original Constitutional USA is long dead--has been since 1865. We're now well into CYCLIC "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler, see, the original heroes now long GONE--who never had it good, only wanted freedom.

But people nowadays, have had it "good" ("prosperous," ho hoho), they think, and that's all they want--they don't care about freedom--they don't even know what it is, really. "Rule-of-law"?--HUH?--they say.

See JR, real freedom is built upon serious rule-of-law, right?--and that means u can't just print money (actually "currency," not real money), but the scum who predominate nowadays think that's what u need for "prosperity"--"money-printing."

We just have a basically dis-honest culture full of dis-honest people willing to fool themselves--way too many of them. The scum today who pre-dominate imagine that "good" was justified for destroying the original Constitutional republic--it's associated w. slavery and "freeing the slaves" which they insist was "good," justification for instituting the absolute state, destruction of local gov.

And now what do we see?--this absolute state now wants to metastasize yet another level into world-dictatorship. And it was "good" thing for them, they think, to literally create ISIS which is now forcing refugees into the West, including Jew S A.

And so u see, JR, reason we the people love Trump, and his style, at least, is he harkens back to national sovereignty of the old CHRISTIAN state, willing to discriminate and say NO Mooooslims--at least for a while till we figure-out some stuff, eh?

And did u hear in the debate yest., Trump told off Bush and how the Bin Laden family-members were flown out of the country in a sweetheart deal--W. Bush knew quite enough about what was really going on.

So people like Trump as he seems to be his own man, willing to say what he really thinks (at least somewhat--he still sucks-up to Israel, if u notice)--and that all by itself sets him apart fm all the other suck-alongs.

Look at Ted Cruz: he's not even vaguely a "natural-born" citizen, born in Canada to naturalized Canadian citizens--what a joke. See https://www.facebook.com/notes/anna-...5852778451290/

So u see, JR?--what a joke things are, culturally--rule-of-law so pathetically forgotten--even for what it basically is, people just making stuff up as they go-along, like Cruz.

That's how Trump is different, esp. for his style--Jews still have the country and people by the short-hairs, otherwise, and it's still a sad situation, truth be told.

Remember: case in theory is ALREADY clinched about Sandy hoax--it only needs sink-in w. circumstances grasped....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015...l#comment-form

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Case Is Already "Clinched" About Sandy Hoax--It Only Needs Dramatization, Circumstances Grasped
(Apollonian, 12 Dec 15)

No (see below-copied), Bushes are NOTHING but total flunkies--hard as it may be to believe. Do u realize that when Prescott Bush, granddad to W., and father to H.W., joined, worked-for, and then left (retired fm) the firm of Harriman and Brown, to become Senator fm Conn., of all places, I believe, he only was allowed to own ONE single share of the stock?--ho ho ho ho ho ho--total flunkies Bushes are, and nothing but.

U go "beyond Banks' control," and u will suddenly find urself assuming room temp.--it's what happened to JFK and many, many others. Don't forget banks can, at a moment's notice, print-up (or digitalize) oceans of currency (not money); they own and control EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE, all politicians, judges, the mass-media, public edjumacation, all the large corp.s--EVERYTHING--such is the God-like power of legalized COUNTERFEITING. Even Ron Paul has to worry about engine-failure of a plane he's passenger in. Bankers have HAARP weapon, EMP weapon(s), Bio-weapons (like ebola) and God knows what else--and there've been strange explosions happening in Russia and China, don't forget.

Of course, any additional info u can use to couch the windows item, long as it doesn't distract, will help, BUT what u simply, merely need do is to present that info, poignant or dramatic as it is (or isn't) that demonstrates in convincing fashion that, "look, here it's un-damaged," this preferably w. a side-by-side photo of the window all shot-out. Fetzer says it, and writes it, but the stupid scum fails to SHOW it in the photos, preferably side-by-side w. contrasting photo. There's nothing more persuasive than sense-perception, don't forget.

And of course, also, the very photo itself of Carver, etc., on the 13th clinches it too, BUT it still might not be clear for a good many, though common sense tells anyone who thinks (very few, unfortunately) that IT MUST BE on the 13th, otherwise why the casual, relaxed Carver as there are supposedly 26 bloody, mangled, little bodies on the inside? And where are the regular ambulances?--they ought to be all around there--the place should be a regular bee-hive of frantic activity, the people all troubled and grief-stricken that so many cute little kidsoes had to bite proverbial dust, each one plugged 3-11 times, brains spattered everywhere--and there's Carver and the drill co-ordinator casually looking things over, getting ready for the big day coming-up.

Remember psycho schizoid and pathologic liar, "stevie," talking about "anomalies"?--well, it's ALL anomalies, a huge, tremendous pile of anomalies, all these anomalies adding-up, don't doubt, w. the inexorable inductive logic to NO OTHER possible conclusion, the "impossible" being necessarily ruled-out, according to Sherlock Holmes himself.

-----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------

Dreadnought December 12, 2015 at 3:32 AM

I know the windows is the clincher, I found them, how do I hammer it home? I thought I had. I think the incidents I find have to be rolled into a sequence and blame for them attributed, as far as I go, I go only to FEMA, I have no proof of anything beyond that. I will try to see where it leads from there. Give me some factual connections if you have any. Anyway what about Malloy? ps I stopped practise because of the corruption and duplicity I found, I despised the Banking and Finance world. The ad hominem about ops is a clincher, they cannot give out personal detail like appearance.

Was it all the bankers? I saw the Bush family as a bunch of thugs who went beyond the Banks' control. Wrong?