Christianity is worship of TRUTH, TRUTH, TRUTH, suckers--it's NOT pacifism, idiot "faithful" beleeeeeeeeeeeeeevin', or self-sacrifice, morons....

Below-copied by ap submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_h...omment-3744754

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Barrett Compares Christian Truth Ideal With Mere Islamic Imperium
(Apollonian, 1 Mar 20)

Barrett: go and ck ur high-school text-books, sucker–European civilization began w. Greeks, even prior to 500 B.C., including especially the Homeric epics, Illiad and Oddysey. Christianity is itself largely a Greek inspiration, the earliest works preserved being written in Greek language. Christians then arose definitively under the Romans and sought to preserve that Greek foundation, Christ (= truth; Gosp. JOHN 14:6) affirming implicitly the OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality as necessary foundation to such truth ideal, aimed explicitly against the Pharisaic subjectivism, “midrash” (interpretation), and “Oral Law Tradition” (see Gosp. JOHN 8:44).

The "racial" impetus and orientation is the very purpose of philosophy, ethics, and all civilization, including especially the Biblic 4th (in some records, the 5th) commandment, "honor thy parentage (race)." And honor for the race also implies the determinist principle of absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" human will. Reality, including then one's personality, is determined by ancestors and all and any precedents and circumstances.

A "vibrant, powerful civilization" is ONLY possible by means of deterministic, hence racially-oriented ethics, philosophy, and culture, as history demonstrates beginning w. Greeks, then Romans, then the Germanic race which Germanic upheld Christian objectivity, reason (Holy Spirit), and determinism. "Love of self" is necessary virtue of PRUDENCE which the Greeks always recognized, and self-interest is simply the basic human condition, humans understood as creatures of will, hence self-interest, hence "sinners," when that intrinsic self-interest isn't tempered by reason (and Holy Spirit).

Thus as Christianity is worship of TRUTH (= Christ) above all, science, reason, and biology are simply aspects of the Holy Spirit, the means by which such truth is apprehended and appreciated, and whatever "purpose" there may be is mere means to happiness and whatever end is chosen--which might be anything. "Self-sacrifice" is what suckers and weaklings do in service to some clever military leader, like the original Muhammud, who inveigled the Arabs to obey his orders when he went about to ambushing the latest caravans making their way in the desert.


-----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------

123.Kevin Barrett says:
March 1, 2020 at 3:03 am GMT • 200 Words
@KenH

European civilization rose when it was Christian, and has been declining since its elites abandoned Christianity. What makes you think a “raceless and universalist creed” cannot survive, thrive, or even dominate in a hostile world, since that is precisely what Western Christian civilization (and Islamic civilization, Confucian civilization, etc.) have done? Even pagan civilizations are based on sacrifice to the gods. What historical examples show that narcissistic racial navel-gazing builds a vibrant, powerful civilization?

Spengler among others saw that the force that raises and sustains civilizations is a spiritual vision or Platonic ideal that gives men an Other worth living and dying for. Mere love of (racial) self will never do that. It is a dead end.

If your answer is that you worship the science of biology, and/or your own biological heritage, you are making a category mistake. Science only reveals what is, not what should be. It offers a description of life, not a purpose.

Poor Hoffman: just can't unnastan' why people can't accept his lies and psycho delusions....

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.c...issenting.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hoffman Continues To Bleat
(Apollonian, 27 Feb 20)

Hoffman, in all his psychotic Passive-Aggression and self-pity just continues to bleat, complain and cry-out. But Hoffman, don't u insist on Pelagian heresy, idea of "good-evil," hence the perfectly "free" human will which will carry us to heaven, regardless God's grace and mercy?

For if "good" were something actually objective and real, then how would God possibly have any grounds for denying one his rightful place in heaven?

So Hoffman tell us, if there really is "good-evil," then what is the criterion, standard, and premise for it by which we can tell definitively the diff? Like the psychotic u really are, u constantly insist there's "good-evil," but NEVER tell us the criterion--NEVER.

U insist u're treated unfairly, and u say Suvorov (real name, Rezun) is wrong about the pre-emptive attack against USSR, but u refuse to say what are the real facts. So how many divisions did Stalin really have on his western borders?--u won't tell us, and who's fault is that?

Hoffman says Hitler should rather have relied upon mere counter-attacking any Russian invasions, Hitler operating upon what Hoffman calls "interior lines," but Hoffman doesn't tell us what his military and strategic qualifications are--did he graduate in the top half of his class at West Point?--what military training did Hoffman ever have and go through?

Hoffman insists Hitler was such a horrible person, not really Christian, but Hoffman as Pelagian heretic, pretending to non-existent "good-evil," we can only suspect Hoffman's own qualifications to be judge of Christianity. And we KNOW the German people thought rather more highly of unc' Adolf than know-it-all Hoffman, the military genius and paragon of moralism, hubris, and sanctimony.

And of course there's Hoffman's previous work on "Usury in Christendom...," in which we see Hoffman inveighs against "usury," not even capable of accurately defining and describing it, Hoffman knowing nothing about money and banking, not even understanding diff. btwn real money and mere "currency" (see Mises.org for proper economic expo; use their site search-engine for particular terms).

So we see, once again, Hoffman is NOT a "historian" at all, whatever he may say and protest--he's not even really a Christian, in all truth, merely the subjectivistic, hubris-filled moralistic and heretic, spouting "good-evil" delusions, pretending he's competent judge of things he plainly knows little-to-nothing about (military and economic), and he's been so terribly injured and treated by people who resent his hereticalism and self-righteousness, not to mention gross ignorance and presumption. Poor Hoffman.

Jew liars are everywhere--quite telling the way they lie....

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted, but then CENSORED, deleted by kike Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_h...ters/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Who's Kidding Who?
(Apollonian 24 Feb 20)

"Realtalk": u're "psych-case," sucker, and u fool no one. Rabbis follow Talmud which is satanic war plan against all gentiles and humanity, and Hoffman does good enough job for his exposition thereof. See his Talmudical.blogspot.com and RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, also then Come-and-hear.com and TruthTellers.org.

U're typical Jew liar when u allege "utter schizobabble," which readers can judge for themselves. Further, many, if not all rabbis follow the "Cabala" mysticism of Zohar which explicitly equates God w. satan.

U Jews are subjectivists who follow "midrash" (interpretation) and "Oral Law Tradition," and u create ur own little reality, Jews dominating because of their collectivistic subjectivism, Jews most organized, cohesive, and best-led among the masses of gentile subjectivists who yet are not as well organized, more "individualist," thus dominated by Jews.


------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------------

8. Realtalk says:
February 24, 2020 at 7:02 pm GMT

Don’t get taken in by Hoffman, friends. Guy seems like he’s making sense for a few sentences then veers into utter schizobabble about the grand schemes of the Satan-worshipping rabbis. Psychiatric case.

Buddist boys do good (enough) job on subject of Truth...

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.bitchute.com/video/XxBk2wxGq3n5/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Excellent discussion w. Brian & Pannobhasa, Though Didn't Discuss Determinism
(Apollonian, 11 Feb 20)

What is truth?--well, it is God = Christ = truth--see Gosp. JOHN 14:6. Christianity then is worship of truth, the highest value, summum bonum--the only way to God the Father. Note also, that very question, "What is truth?" is asked by Pontius Pilate to Christ at Gosp. JOHN 18:37. Christ replies nothing, allowing Pilate to move on to his next thought, the idea then (of the Gospel-writer) being that it is the very problem, but which Christ rather wants to leave for Pilate to figure-out for himself.

Thus truth is what is reflected by the objective, hence God-given, reality--as we confirm by observation and science, all science, logic, and reason dependent upon that objective reality and premise thereto--also known as "correspondence theory," as noted by Pannobhasa. "Coherence" then would be mere elaboration which couldn't work without "correspondence" or objective reality already implicit.

So it comes down to objectivity--or not--and nothing else works. Only problem w. this excellent discussion btwn Brian and Pannobhasa is it didn't get into the "free" will vs. determinist issue.

Note also the Greeks discussed this problem of the fundamentals of reality and philosophy, called "metaphysics," and observe that if there were no objectivity, then NOTHING works, as subjectivism falls to reduction ad absurdum--if reality is subjective, then ANYTHING goes, and there's no limit--one can both be and not be, etc.

Further, observe that this basic premise is itself obviously un-provable, as it is the most basic, nothing coming before it as premise--an ASSUMPTION (necessarily). Anything not objective then falls to reduction-ad-absurdum.

So u see, it's not provable, that basic premise for things, so it's really matter of choice, and we see that SUBJECTIVISM is extremely useful for Satanists (extreme subjectivists--idea that reality is mere product of mind/consciousness, making subject God, the creator--satanism) as it (subjectivism) is basic premise for non-existent delusion of "good-evil" which thus allows Satanists great power over the inferiors and weaklings of the world (not that they're "bad")--who are by far the most numerous and prevalent in numbers, hence politically powerful--weaklings and inferiors sooo subject to INFERIORITY-COMPLEX and "guilt," and thus "good-evil" delusion, known to Catholics as Pelagian heresy--the idea that human "free" will can choose "good," and thus the subject can WILL his way to virtue and DEMAND of God a place in Heaven.

Note then, most powerful (politically, sociologically, and psychologically) Satanists are the COLLECTIVIST subjectivists who are most organized, cohesive and best led, who collude in most effective, successful "group-think," and who have always been Jews (see Gosp. JOHN 8:44). For best expo on Judaism see Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org.

Thus Christianity hold humans are poor sinners, always have been, always will be, by virtue of the human will, which isn't perfectly "free" as God's is, but which makes the human necessarily "egoistic," thus following one's will and/or "interest"--the human necessarily self-interested and incapable of anything else, hence a "sinner."

So one sees the choice btwn objective and subjective (similar to Aristotle vs. Plato who upheld "good" along w. truth and beauty as his kind of foremost "trinity"), and as perfect "free" will is impossible but for God, the world is DETERMINIST, according to absolute cause-effect, there being no perfectly "free" human will.

Thus one sees the perfection of Christian philosophy embedded within the "religion" and myth, which philosophy is understood by only a few, most "Christians" occupied and rather fascinated by that ethical discussion and teachings found in Gospels which so much seem to dominate the interest of the volk, ethics over metaphysics.

Real Christian philosophy hidden, mis-represented--WHY?

Here, below, is the sales ad placed on outside back-cover for Apollonian new booklet, "Discover Real Christianity, History and Philosophy, NOT Mere Religion, Myth," coming soon, for sale

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Satanists Want To Hide Real Christianity--Why?
(Apollonian, 1 Feb 20)

Have u ever noticed Christianity is hated?--but hated by who?--well, Christianity is hated by Satanists to name one group among any others, so why and how is this? For Christianity must be and have a philosophy opposed to the Satanists, right?

And Satanists have a philosophy too--so what would that be, exactly?--isn't it important to know?--especially as satanists really seem to be succeeding. Shouldn't people be alarmed at this satanic success? For this growing Satanism is all around us, evermore in our proverbial faces and actually all over and upon us. People need to wake up.

So what actually is Christianity?--isn't it more than just mumbo-jumbo, chanting, and "feel-good" platitudes?--is there an actual philosophic CORE to it?

So aside fm the "religious" exterior and the mythic story to it, there has to be a genuine CORE to Christianity which is valuable for philosophy. For the ethics practiced and preached by Christ told in New Test. story is what people have always loved and admired, un-questionably--even the Satanists cannot deny, and isn't this admiration and respect for Christian ethics a main thing Satanists detest and hate?

So Christian PHILOSOPHY then is what's MOST important to be understood--why it was (and still is) so successful--why it's nowadays so horribly covered-up and deliberately hidden by its so-called defenders and "leaders." For establishment Christianity is hardly Christian at all, in all truth--it's been infiltrated by anti-Christs, heretics, and Satanists. No wonder people have so little respect for the establishment "Christian" brand.

Real Christianity then, deserves a fair and serious, even if brief examination--for it isn't and couldn't be "rocket-science," and it's got to be more than mere mumbo-jumbo and humbug. So let's find-out what the Satanists, who now rule, don't want us to know and try to hide about dear Christianity and Christian philosophy.

Ho ho ho, Hoffman, the virtue-signaling liar, cries that critics won't read his worthless book, ho ho ho...

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.c...-enemy-of.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Poor Hoffman, Passive-Aggressive Psycho, Liar, Can't Figure-Out Why His Book Won't Sell
(Apollonian, 5 Dec 19)

Ho ho ho ho ho, what?--u're "not surprised," Hoffman?--would that be because u've ALWAYS been a loser in ur pathetic life, playing the know-it-all moralistic, Pharisaic, virtue-signaler, always lecturing others how they should be "good," like u?--ho ho o ho hoho.

And what?--it "doesn't appear [ur] book has been read"?--and "facts" have not been "addressed"?--what "facts"?--about Bolsheviks of Russia not intending to invade Europe?--those are palpable, provable lies, when Stalin plainly invaded Finland, the Baltic states, and demanded and took parts of Rumania, thus threatening the vital oil sources of Ploesti, among the other facts, like the number of most powerful tank forces in the whole world, etc.

Then u throw in w. ur lies about Strasser, when the truth is it's unclear what exactly happened. And again, we KNOW already ur only real purpose is virtue-signaling, Hoffman, the passive-aggressive psycho obsessed upon non-existent "good-evil," Hoffman the Pelagian heretic pretending to a "free" will capable of impressing God, who already explained that all humans are sinners, un-worthy of any rewards after a life filled w. sin.

And why does anyone need ur worthless book, Hoffman, when u don't make any sense about much of anything else, always pretending as u do to moralism and moralizing in ur tiresome, moronic manner?

Don't u think we already KNOW what magnificent HERO was unc' Adolf?--speaking truth and defiance to satanic Jews and liars like urself who sympathize w. Jews and their lies and lying?

After all, we already KNOW about ur previous work on "usury" in which u pretend God forbids, as the Musselmen hold, the practice of lending at interest--which is just another lie by a lying, Jew-like liar like urself, sucker. For Christ = TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), the "only way to the Father," and God is thus ALWAYS rational, about which a hereticalist, lying virtue-signaler like urself is so utterly ignorant.

Hence lending at interest is obviously mere matter of personal contract and agreement among the citizenry and people. God only makes irrationalist commandments for the Musselmen, Hoffman. For true Christians, unlike Hoffman, God is TRUTH and always perfectly rational. Hence "usury" COULD NOT be mere lending at interest, and such honest lending at interest COULD NEVER be forbidden by rational God of truth and reason.

Hoffman, hereticalist virtue-signaler just cannot abide such truth and reason--that's ur problem, Hoffman, thou poor fool, passive-aggressive psycho. Take ur book of lies and lying about heroic unc' Adolf, and stick it, sucker. No one needs Hoffman and his idiot lying and moralizing--especially when we already have to contend w. these satanic Jews--Hoffman can't, won't figure that out.

Hoffman is positively comical for his know-it-all insistance he knows all about military strategy, how Hitler went wrong, etc....

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.c...ook-enemy.html , but not published (gee, I wonder why?), ho ho ho.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hoffman: Pathetic Psycho, Mindlessly Envious, Obsessive Virtue-Signaler
(Apollonian, 24 Nov 19)

Ho ho hoh oho, Mike Hoffman, passive-aggressive, virtue-signaling little psycho, envious of Jews and Adolf Hitler at same time, has a "genius" idea, by golly: he'll make a sop to his Jew enemies, who hate him for his Talmudic exposition, which he expects will confute at least some of the Jews, at same time as he maligns and tries to defame a real hero, Adolf Hitler, as in his new book, "Adolf Hitler...." What's Hoffman's "thesis"?--that unc' Adolf was "enemy of the German people," again, according to his book and title thereof.

So Hoffman says Hitler betrayed Germans by attacking poor Russkies--who only had 170 divisions sitting on the border btwn the two, and adds Hoffman, Hitler failed to eradicate "usury," this usury being one of Hoffman's psychotic, obsessive little hobby-horses which he insists God has forbidden (see his book, "Usury in Christendom...").

But didn't unc' Adolf speak truth about Jews, and inspire his people thereby?--and doesn't that deserve credit?--well, of course, but Hoffman is jealous of such hero as Hitler, and is too much the moralistic Pharisee and virtue-signaler, who insists he's only one who's allowed to criticize Jews, u understand. Hoffman is the megalomaniac among moralists, u understand, probably thinks he should be pope as he pretends to Christianity and general know-it-all as about economics and money and banking, Hoffman now in this case, regarding Hitler and WWII, the supreme arm-chair military strategist, no less.

So let's observe Hoffman as he converses w. one of his correspondents who attempts reasoning w. Hoffman in comments section on his blog (see https://revisionistreview.blogspot.c...ook-enemy.html ). Thus it's presented to arm-chair general Hoffman, "At the time, 6 German divisions, on the border between Poland and the Soviet Union, faced 170 Russian divisions." Just before, "[I]n June 1941, the Soviets annexed Bessarabia and North Bukovina [in Rumania]. They were thus threatening near the Romanian oil wells,...."

Arm-chair general Hoffman responds: "...a wise German leader [Hoffman knows all about "wisdom," u understand] would have done to Stalin’s forces what Stalin did to Hitler’s...." Thus Hoffman would have Hitler to allow the Soviets to attack first, eschewing the pre-emptive attack of the Germans which we KNOW was successful--Germans only faltered later as Stalin was heavily supplied by USA "Lend-Lease" w. essential trucks, enhancing greatly mobility of soviet forces, and food which soviets lacked, as usual for them and all socialists.

Hoffman's responses are highly entertaining as the know-it-all Hoffman lectures his correspondent, "[t]his contention violates every principle of military strategy," he pompously announces. Hoffman the pretended scholar imagines that quoting sources and other opinions absolutely proves his contentions, as Hoffman pontificates, "[I]n my book I quote the sources that show that Hitler’s generals who were in charge of supplying the Ostheer, stated to him by the end of 1941, that the army could no longer be adequately supplied, the war was lost,...." Case closed, according to Hoffman--this is Hoffman's idea of scholarship and argumentation, folks, Hoffman the passive-aggressive, virtue-signaling psycho.

It's truly amusing to observe Hoffman in above-mentioned comments section going on w. his moronic, presumptuous lecturing and declamations, but regardless, he may indeed very well finally be able to accomplish some significant sales of his book, though I don't think Jews will allow too much of that as it would bring attn. to Hoffman's anti-Talmudic expositions. Who else will sell and feature Hoffman's work? But at least Hoffman might be able to inveigle some of the dumber Jews to giving him a word of defense or mitigation in face of otherwise overall, typical, and obligatory Jew hatred. Poor Hoffman, the fool, psycho, and pathetically inept virtue-signaler.