Below-copied by ap submitted, but CENSORED/deleted by kike, Unz, at comments,
http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/being-marco-rubio/* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
For Jews/Judaism, Talmud, Midrash Is Definitive,
Necessarily--SUBJECTIVISM Being The Essence
(Apollonian, 17 Feb
19)
Anon: MOST of my entries and attempted postings here at "Unz
Review," run by this Jew, Unz, are deleted/CENSORED. Unz only publishes what he
imagines will bring the desired reaction fm readership, hoping thereby to
dis-credit real, serious anti-Semitism--after all, he's Jew,
right?
Ultimately people will have to judge for themselves, and I've not
only given extensive exposition, which must stand for itself, but I've also
given excellent references, so I'm quite content as I should and must be.
Besides, all my stuff, including that which is censored/deleted by Unz, is
published elsewhere, fairly easily accessed by anyone, so I'm
satisfied.
But I'll simply note that thou are lying liar when thou lies
and says it's only Torah which is definitive above Talmud, for Jews, when it's
other way round, sucker--people will have to verify this for themselves. Torah
ONLY means what Jew Rabbis say it means, moron, and Jews are DEFINED by the
Talmud, thou dumbass. If one DOESN'T follow Talmud, that one is NOT NOT NOT a
Jew--BY DEFINITION of the very (Talmudic) religion, fool--get a
clue.
Thou makes no sense, pretending thy scholarship is superior--how
could it be, when thou lies like a dog as thou do? Thou don't even understand
"Oral Law Tradition" exclusively of Pharisees and Talmud which means Torah must
be further explained by this "tradition," giving the "midrash" (interpretation).
Torah ONLY means what rabbis say it means, sucker--as written-out in Talmud (and
other rabbinic sources, like "Kol Nidre" prayer, absolving Jew monsters of lying
even before they tell the lie, ho ho ho ho).
Thou are SUCH an idiot: thou
says one must read the original source material, etc., and one must agree, but
question is HOW MUCH? Full Talmud (Babylonian) is THREE times the length of the
Christian Bible, including Old and New Testaments. Does one have to read all of
it, every single word?--is it possible to get basic "drift" after--what?--two
thirds?--how about half? Look at thou: thou indicates, pretends, and implies
thou read all of it, but thou still doesn't understand it.
Observe
further: thou doesn't even understand basic, simple philosophy of Talmud, which
in ONE-WORD is "midrash"--INTERPRETATION. Torah means ONLY what rabbis say, by
means of their MIDRASH, sucker.
In other words--TOTAL, ABSOLUTE
SUBJECTIVISM/satanism--Torah and ANYTHING means ONLY what rabbis and Jew leaders
SAY. Reality for these Satanists is what they say it is, according to
mentality/consciousness (and "midrash" interpretation)--making the subject the
creator of reality, God--Satanism, by definition.
Jews then simply make
their satanic/subjectivist religion a COLLECTIVIST "group-think," Jews most
dedicated, committed, and ORGANIZED, thus allowing them to dominate and lead all
the other subjectivists/Satanists, as among goyim, even though these far
out-number Jews.
So I'm going to conclude here as I don't want to expend
too much effort as Unz is most probably going to delete/Censor all this, as he
typically does. Amen.
------------------above by ap in response to
below-copied--------------------
# 543, Anon[189] • Disclaimer
says:
February 17, 2019 at 9:17 pm GMT • 2,100 Words
@apollonian
So
the Jew monster and psychopath tells us,
“Reading the Talmud is not
necessary.”
I’m not Jewish. I’m one of the most prolific anti-Judaism
commenters here. In fact, as I scroll through the comments here, I can see old
information of mine re-posted by participants who obviously took to what I wrote
and the resources that I recommended . See comment 506 in this thread for one
example, wherein Robjil remarks on the concept of “noheg l’doros”, which I
posted about here recently. He links to the Chabad page to which I had
linked.
I gained that information by doing the actual work in reading
their primary sources, as I recommend to others here.
Not in reading
second hand quotation sites that will keep you in a very limited box of
understanding.
Read the Talmud if you wish. If you can find an accurate
English translation, which is doubtful.
Because you will never afford nor
seek to buy the complete Talmud, if you could find one that you could read, you
and the rest of the anti-Jewish group who does not bother to read the core and
much more accessible texts (the Old Testament) will always be reliant on second
hand sources for limited quotations.
For some, that will be fine though
their understanding will remain rather limited.
For others, they will
find differences in interpretation or outright false quotes (when they decide to
research further) that will cause them to decide that the Talmud information is
too deconextualized when it isn’t spotty and therefore unreliable. Weakening
both their resolve and their understanding.
[Hide MORE]
On the
other hand, the Talmud is commentary on the Five Books that almost everyone has
in their home. Anything expanded on in the Talmud can be found in those books,
and the writing is in its full context (assuming that one understands a couple
of basic premises about their code).
I understood much more when I
stopped relying on second hand quotes and decided to read the Old Testament. My
understanding of their religion expanded, and this effort brought to light just
how psychopathic their religion is. You think that you know, but you don’t know
until you read the OT. Whereas decontextualized second hand Talmud quotes did
not give me the full picture.
Their primary myths are found in the OT,
not in the Talmud. How are you going to be able to interpret Jewish behavior if
you aren’t aware of their mythology as it extends throughout the OT? Their myths
define their religion as well as provide them their primary political
instruction.
Their myths explain some of their most symbolically
genocidal behavior that predicts future genocide (Exodus, Purim, etc).
Not only that, but there are dozens of small details that explain modern
events. For example, did you know that the Jews prophecize their treatment of
the Palestinians, and their eventual genocide, in the OT?
Did you know
that they prophecize the ethnic cleansing of Syria in the OT? These are not
actually prophecies but instructions. You know nothing without having read and
understood the OT.
If I wanted to distract slightly woken up Goyim from
reading the treachary, barbarism, and genocidal intent of my religion, which is
all detailed in a book that every one of them has in their house and that
follows a much easier narrative format, I would certainly seek to distract by
being apoplectic over another set of hard to follow books (the Talmud) that none
of them have and that they will always get limited information from. Just as you
are doing here.
But the OBVIOUS fact is Talmud IS Judaism,
That
is neither obvious nor true. Obvious how? Via some second hand website’s claim?
You are being deceptive if you aren’t merely ignorant. It is axiomatic that the
Torah IS Judaism.
Judaism is the Torah, not the Talmud. The Torah
includes the Talmud, but not only the Talmud. The Talmud, like the Midrash that
it is based as well as all other Jewish books within the entire Torah, are
commentary on the Tanakh or Pentatecuh. Which every Christian has in their home.
Talmud is definitive, and what is Talmud?–it’s written-out “midrash”
(interpretation, as of Torah, first five books, Mosaic law), written-out “Oral
Law Tradition,” this “tradition” the very ESSENCE of Judaism, Jews followers of
Pharisees and Talmud. See Talmudical.blogspot.com,
RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for expo.
Thus
Talmud is the very essence of Judaism,
How can something that is
commentary on another set of texts be the essence of Judaism? That’s like
stating that the apple skin is the essence of the apple. Your information is
false and deceptive.
Thus? Thus from what? Websites that distract you
from what they don’t want you to read and understand? Go ahead and read the
Talmud, if you find that fruitful. I did not say do not read it, and I did not
say that it cannot be a source for knowledge of some of their views.
I
just do not find it even close to being the most fruitful use of time for anyone
who has not read the Old Testament with the appropriate understanding of it.
Moreover, reading and understanding the Old Testament will add much more context
to the Talmud.
and to KNOW Jews, one must understand the Talmud, the
written-out version of Oral Law Tradition, period.
Nonsense. You can get
everything in the Talmud from the OT and the Zohar. Assuming that you understand
the very easy OT coded language and perspective. The Zohar is more straight
forward than the OT, and much more concise than the Talmud. However, it delves
into spiritual concepts that may be over the head of some readers: depending on
their background with the material. This is why I first recommend the
OT.
Go ahead and read the Old Testament with only two understandings in
mind:
1. All of their myths are meant to apply to the modern day, with
modern tribes mapped onto Old Testament tribes and any modern position of the
Jews meant to reflect their position at some point in their texts (Philistines
are the Palestinians, Esau is Christianity and Europe, Persians are a Germanic
tribe, etc).
Therefore, the texts are instruction for the modern
day.
2. Their references to animals (beasts) and rocks are most often
references to gentiles.
And you will understand the vast majority of what
you need to know about their religion. To state otherwise means that you have
not read the Old Testament, or that you are a lying.
My opinion is that
you are too lazy to delve seriously into their materials, and prefer defending
second hand Talmud quotation websites over any recommendation to do any actual
work.
If you want to read the Talmud, I recommend leaving the second
hand quote sites alone and instead researching it yourself on:
https://www.sefaria.org
The same information can be found, you will have it verified, and their
expanding commentary will be included.
Talmud is literally the war-plan
of Jews who conduct Talmudic war against gentiles.
No, its not. The
Talmud is the commentary on that plan. The Tanakh is that plan. Which you would
know if you had read it.
Then the Jew psychopathic monster
says,
“…this text that no non-Jew possess, assuming they could read it
(unlikely),….”
But fact is the Talmud is published and accessible for
anyone–they can just go on-line to find out what it says.
The Talmud’s
full accessibility online is new.
Second, there are the accessibility
issues of length and a lack of continuity in any Talmud narrative that make it
not the best choice for either starting out or relying on it over other texts.
Third, it lacks the crucial myths.
Last, it is not the central
set of texts. But as I stated, and if you have the patience and prior context
from reading the Old Testament, then have at it.
And note the Jew
psychopath pretends no one can “read” the stinking, satanic, filthy Talmud which
exhorts war against the gentile. In fact, it’s absolutely NECESSARY to read
Talmud and KNOW what it’s all about–regardless the lies of Jew psychopaths and
monsters like this one we have here to whom I respond.
You are obviously
slightly retarded in these matters (to be more polite than I need to be) and so
you should learn to be more polite.
Next, the Jew psychopath
says,
“The Talmud is only a commentary on the Five Books or Old
Testament.”
Yes, it’s “commentary,” but there’s a pt. and purpose to that
commentary, as the commentary demonstrates the Talmudic philosophy which is (a)
war against the gentiles, (b) for the purposes and “good” of Jews, as determined
by the leaders, the rabbis, Jews COLLECTIVELY understood as co-equal w. God, God
the servant of Jews, God acting as assassin/hit-man for Jews, as on Passover and
Purim; and (c) it (Talmud) demonstrates the METHOD, “midrash”
(interpretation)–SUBJECTIVISM, by which subjectivism Jews create reality within
their minds/consciousnesses, making themselves God, the
creator–Satanism.
No, the commentary does not (first) demonstrate all of
that (and I doubt that you have read the Talmud to any significant length).
The Tanakh, on which the Talmud is commentary, first demonstrates every
bit of that (but also you have not read it, and so how would you
know).
The lying Jew monster tells us,
“They just don’t read
them,”
which means the Jew monster pretends he’s in position to know and
comment upon inferior gentiles’ ignorance, etc.–the usual, typical, traditional,
obligatory, Talmudic Jew contempt and hatred for the dumb, gentile
cattle.
Please, you defensive, over-emotional dolt. I am a gentile. I
well know that most gentiles have not read their Bibles in full (or even at any
considerable length, and especially not the Old Testament). This is not a
controversial nor incorrect opinion. This is the truth. Its human nature to not
want to sit down with hundreds of pages of archaic text in regard to a religion
that they are not supposed to understand. Now stop defending the indefensible
and wasting everyone’s time and your own energy.
The spirit of my comment
was to demonstrate that if most people have not read their Bibles, which they
have not, then referring them to a much longer set of hard to get and hard to
read Rabbinical legal texts with dubious English translations is nonsense. That
is, if you wish to build actual support for your assumed positions.
Especially when they can get all of the necessary information, minus a
couple of allegories and redundant expansions on the blood curdling calls for
genocide, instead in narrative and the necessary mythological form.
So we
see the monumental monstrosity of Jews and Judaism–THEY WORSHIP LIES, LYING, AND
LIARS, like satan, including LYING TO THEMSELVES, as in this case-in-pt., a Jew
lying psychopath and monstrosity who has so thoroughly lied to himself, as we
see. Such is the Talmudic war against humanity and gentiles, such is the
Talmudic METHOD of lies and lying, including LYING TO ONESELF.
Time for
meds. And you were leaning on the Caps Lock. Oops.
Judaism, which is
just Satanism, the leading and most practical version (of Satanism) on earth,
MUST BE EXTERMINATED, and Jews seem to understand this extermination is what
gentiles must do, and should do, Jews wanting to get-out in-front by way of
pre-empting this necessary extermination, as if to getting the gentiles to swear
that they wouldn’t dare so think of exterminating this satanic filth–which
gentiles MUST do to save their very lives.
The Satan concept merely
refers to an adversary or accuser. The Jews are our Satan and we are theirs.
Notice how we accuse one another.
You speak in this discussion like you
are trying to trash it and drive it over a cliff. In real life, even if someone
were to agree with your statements, being near you or associated with you would
be an extreme liability because you obviously cannot control your emotions and
therefore have no OpSec.
My impulse would be to treat you in these
comments sections as anyone who is half sane would treat you in real life: which
is to keep you at a distance due to your wild ranting style that is full with
calls for genocide that will have any law enforcement agency crawling all over
this comments section. But this is an electronic forum and I can’t control you
nor anyone else here, and so I guess we’ll see how your insane brand of
emotional dumping combined with your topical ignorance turns out here.
