http://bellofchurch.blogspot.com/201...l#comment-form
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Which Came First?--Philosophy Or
Literature?
(Apollonian, 19 Nov 16)
(Apollonian, 19 Nov 16)
Ho ho ho--the "word of God"?--really?--so what's NOT the "word of God"? God, by definition, created everything, right? So everything that happens and is said is the product and word of God, right? Ho ho ho ho ho
But what we're really trying to talking about, I presume, is a definitive philosophy--and how complicated can it be? For it, this philosophy, must be "relevant," or pertinent, or significant for us, the people.
And we know the precursor of New Test., the Old Test., which strove to present a philosophy. Thus as religion presents and features an aesthetic, Christianity is a literary religion, like the Old Test. before it. Hence we have a dialectic, thesis and anti-thesis, Christ restating and clarifying things fm Old Test. in definitive manner, his main (philosophic) opponents being the Pharisees who later wrote the Talmud.
Thus Christ presents a (basic) philosophy and then defines therefrom an ethical principle/method so profoundly rationalistic that satanists (extreme subjectivists) and mystics have hated it ever since.
Thus Christ reassures us of the existence of truth (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) which exists necessarily and logically as product of an objective (Aristotelian) reality, God-given and -created for Christians and all humans.
Such then is the place and purpose of New Test., vehicle of the philosophy, the simplicity and efficacy of which is sooooooooo frustrating for satanists and Pharisaics.
So it's good to see the latest lies, written by the latest Pharisaics and satanists, are analyzed for fullest context once again in this article--it's much a question of chicken and egg--which came first, the philosophy or the literature? What now is the philosophy?--the satanists and Pharisees don't want the people to know, so they slander the literature.
No comments:
Post a Comment