Nature of government, how and why the people can "nullify" un-Constitutional Fed. laws--and to secede

Basis Of Nullification, Secession: Natural Law, Reason, And Social Contract

(Apollonian, 4 May 13)

Well Luke (see below-copied, fm "Luke," posted at http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/eric-holder-threatens-kansas-over-nullification/#disqus_thread): u just gotta analyze it--isn't gov. something properly in accord w. contract?--and isn't this what our issues, nullification and secession, are all about?--a matter of analysis of the contract/compact--Constitution?--which, we see, u say nothing about. So how then is any conclusion by u to be considered, u merely presuming?

So what if KC made some declaration as u describe?--wouldn't it all depend upon the various circumstances, whatever they were?--which u say NOTHING about.

Fact is, then, if KC wanted to Declare Independence why shouldn't they have that right?--and if they could enforce it, wouldn't that be the end of the story?

Finally, here's the pt.: in dispute btwn states and Fed gov., isn't the US Sup. ct. obviously BIASED?--don't u see a problem there?

And if Sup. ct. is biased (as it obviously is), then what?--don't the states have obligations to their citizens as agencies which created the Fed gov. in first place?

Which came first, the states or the Fed gov.? So states made themselves slaves to Fed gov.?--ho ho ho--wouldn't that be treason to the people?


---------------above by ap in response to below-copied by "Luke"------------------


Luke•8 hours ago

Hey, that's great. Hope you're all as understanding when Kansas City declares some state law as being in violation of the Kansas state constitution and threatens any state authority that enters the city to enforce it. But wait, I forgot, that's exactly what you do want-- the end of all government authority. So I guess you're looking forward to that too.