Unc' Adolf must be seen in proper historical context--Germans were ALWAYS on defensive....

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted (but not published by the kike, Unz) at comments, http://www.unz.com/runz/an-open-lett...hers/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hitler Was Heroic Leader, Putting-Up Desperate Last-Gasp Resistance To Jews, Bolsheviks, Western Conspirators, Taking-Over World
(Apollonian, 28 Dec 18)

Baker: u got it all wrong, buddy: Germans and Austrians were first attacked, in WWI (the first part of the large 30 yr war w. a 21 yr interlude) by conspiracy of the Entente allies, Russkies (Tsarists) and Serbs plotting, and then murdering the Austrian ArchDuke, THEN on top of that, Russkies mobilizing to start the war when Austrians objected to the casus belli (murdered ArchDuke), Russkies mobilizing on 25 July (1914), a full week before Germans reacted, giving French time to mobilize in their turn to anticipate the Schlieffen Plan. See "Hidden History...," by Docherty and MacGregor. WWI was done-deal, the Germans (and Austrians) too late to catch-on, ambushed, bush-wacked.

Then who was blamed for start of WWI?--Germans, in corrupt Versailles Treaty, who were horribly taken for territory, as by Poles, who additionally demanded city of Danzig upon threat of war, Brits moreover making offensive treaty w. Poles in Mar 1939. See David Hoggan, "The Forced War." French again poised for war, Bolshies ready w. largest military on earth, w. fearsome T-34 tanks, etc.

Germans had LOST the first war, Germans now in extreme defensive as throughout the war (WWII), always on defense--but it was a losing effort fm very start, Germans fighting a hopeless struggle, the American Jew S A heavily funding and supplying ("Lend-Lease") all the allies, esp. Brits and Russkies, which Russkies finally hit their stride at end of 1942, as at Stalingrad.

The first war, WWI, was, at least at the end, for League of Nations world dictatorship, the second war, WWII, to decisively enforce and consolidate such world dictatorship, featuring now today's Agenda-21 and -2030 planned GENOCIDE, the world little grasping the model for such dictatorship was USSR--NOT Jew S A which was to be the dog wagged by the tail, Israeli terror-state, which did 9/11 (see Bollyn.com and "Solving 9/11"), just for one of their most recent stunts, not to mention their continuing mass-murder of the native Palestinians ("The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine," by Ilan Pappe).

So u see, heroic, tragic Germans were ALWAYS on the defensive, getting the best man they could find, heroic unc' Adolf, to lead a desperate, even if losing defense against the Jew-dominated West and their Jew-bolshie GOLEM, the monstrous, cannibalistic USSR.

U're absolutely right about those monstrous Jews squealing about the "6 million"--see Don Heddesheimer's "The First Six Million," Jews yelping and shrieking long before WWII, just after WWI, and probably even before that too. People forget the Zundel trial against Canadian gov., the trial transcript ("Did Six Million Really Die?") exposing the Jew liars.

People know about conspiring, criminal, psychopathic Jews, always plotting--see "Protocols of Learned Elders of Zion," which regardless the real source, accurately describes the actions, purposes, and machinations of Jew criminals and satanists. But people are relatively ignorant of the Brit-French-Russkie collusion to start WWI, falsely blaming Germans, as at Versailles, etc., this plotting for WWI done by the "Round-Table" conspirators, founded by Cecil J. Rhodes, of later (in Jew S A) "Council on Foreign Relations," riddled w. Jews, as it is today, but especially for the absolutely essential Rothschild financing.


----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------------

David Baker says:
December 27, 2018 at 9:49 am GMT • 200 Words
@Wizard of Oz

The Nazis were dupes, who aided Zionists in their quest to compel Jews to emigrate to Palestine. Prior to the Third Reich, Jewish publications were constantly claiming 6,000,000 of their tribe were being hated and exterminated. None of these ploys convinced European Jews of the need for their departure–they did convince many people to donate to the Zionist cause, though. European Jews were doing quite well, with thriving businesses and cultural acceptance within several countries, including Germany. Zionists saw in Hitler the true “Anti-Semite” (They’re not Semitic..) who would take drastic action against Jews, and they had a field day conjuring up atrocity stories and other propaganda to portray Der Fuhrer as the Devil Incarnate.

Hitler did heartlessly exploit war refugees as forced laborers, packing these hapless people off to camps to work for the German War Machine. This short sighted scheme resulted in the horrible deaths of those refugees from diseases and starvation as the German Supply Lines were cut.

Gave the Jew, Unz, a good dose of truth, here, but now he's setting-up for serious censorship....

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/runz/an-open-lett.../#new_comments

Interestingly, Unz went ahead and published this essay of mine, but significantly, posted this note at the top of the text,

"[You have already been told that bizarre use of unorthodox grammar or spelling (e.g. u, u're, urself), especially in content-free rants, will greatly reduce the likelihood of your comments being published. This is your final warning.]"

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

With "Colin Wright" "Alt-right" (Or Anyone) Doesn't Need Enemies, Suckers
(Apollonian, 24 Dec 18)

Take Holocaust Denial. I happen to be convinced that the Holocaust happened substantially as advertised, but others aren’t.

What?--first of all, it's holohoax, nothing else. And WHO would be "convinced" holohoax "happened substantially as advertised..."?--absolutely NO ONE, but a satanic liar, that's who, the purpose being to besmirch heroic German people who fought so brilliantly against Jew-Bolshevik murderers, which Jew-bolsheviki had already shown themselves as mass-murderers in Ukraine in 1932-3, before NSDAP took power and which heroic German people really were mass-exterminated by Jews, Eisenhower (who was a Jew), and their satanic suck-alongs of the West, Jew S A, and UK.

Think about it--anyone who'd lie about holohoax, as above quote, would probably deny millions of Germans were mass-murdered, as by starvation and disease during and after WWII, according to evidence by James Bacque, deny the holodomor of Ukraine, and deny the Armenian mass-murders by the Donmeh crypto descendents of Jew messiah, Sabbatai Zevi, who'd taken control of Turkey--they'd also deny that holohoax is deliberately pushed by Jews-media and public edjumacation establishment as way of masking and justifying the ethnic cleansing of Palestine--as well as everywhere else, presently, in Western world. Good gravy.

Seriously: just ask urself what sort of psychopathic, lying filth would blithely say such thing (quoted, above)?

But that's not the end, next we get this gem:

plugging Holocaust denial in particular, one immediately marginalizes both oneself and anyone one is associated with. Unz Review can have twelve interesting ideas that might actually gain traction with the casual visitor — but if Holocaust Denial is at the top of the page, he’ll move hastily on.

Isn't it OBVIOUS that there's alternative to the idiot suggestion of the quote?--that calling spade spade, and that holohoax is simply satanic lying, is really and truly simply standing up for truth and against satanic lying?

Observe how the moron drones blithely on,

...but if Holocaust Denial is at the top of the page, he’ll move hastily on.

No sucker, only one who'd do that would be purest, most worthless COWARD, suck-along w. satanists and Jews, Jews the REAL problem, the worst enemies of all humanity, justly hated by all races and cultures, all throughout history.

So we see Unz, the Jew, setting things up for such cowardly, craven, satanic lies, like holohoax, and gross, utter COMPROMISE for those whom Unz patronizingly pretends to want to "helping" or advising, or counseling--good grief. For with people like "Colin Wright," whose probably either Jew or homosexual (or both), no Christian or "alt-right" or any gentile of any self-respect needs enemies.

So this is what Unz's website is all about, is it?--the compromising and subverting of the general patriot, "nationalist" movement?--by means of moronic crap like this fm "Colin Wright"?

Comrades, if we're ANY kind of self-respecting humans, we must stand for TRUTH, the original Christian ideal (Gosp. JOHN 14:6)--and holohoax is dead give-away for the very most deadly SATANIC problem and affliction, this putrid, namby-pamby, limp-wristed sort of lying and corruption as "Colin Wright," who imagines humanity is soooo stupid as to just let it pass by--like Unz does, we see.

Unz, u fool, don't u realize "Colin Wright" has exposed u?--compromised u?--absolutely reduced u to abject, comical, and moronic absurd? U censor an honest person like me, but u blandly publish this complete dweeb, "Colin Wright," and expect it to just get along?

Now we get to the REAL Unz, don't we?--for what kind of person, in the first place, is willing to be known as "Jew," Unz, tell us--especially w. the OBVIOUS Talmudic connection and implications. Don't tell us u're not "religious," Unz, as this idiot "atheism" (or whatever) is well-known and classic stratagem, which atheism itself is mere religion all its own--no one can or ever has PROVEN there's no God, sucker. And yet to insist there isn't (any God) w. the sort of emotion and steadfastness atheists (almost always Jews) typically display is just an analogous kind of religious conviction and comportment.

For if u're truly "atheist," then why would u call urself "Jew"? Isn't ur racial association quite "religious" in itself? U're willing to be known as Jew--even though so many people hate Jews?--Jews notorious objects of hatred, revulsion, fear, suspicion, question, etc.

We gentiles and Christians have ALWAYS hated Jews, Unz--can't u finally figure that out? Christian religion is necessarily anti-semitic as Judaism and Talmud are blatant ANTI-THESIS, even in the classic Hegelian style, to Christian truth ideal. Even before the Christians, u Jews were particularly hated by gentiles, including esp. the Greeks in their rationalist tradition, who also held TRUTH as foremost ideal.

Even if u pretend u're atheist and "not religious," fact remains u, simply as Jew, preach tolerance of those Talmudistics of ur racial/genetic relation WHO ARE "religious." So u can't get away fm the problem of ur hypocrisy, on the one hand not willing to own to the Talmud, yet pretending it's okay to be related genetically, not regretting the Talmud--because u KNOW it would be TREASON to ur people, including the religious--which repudiation u're not willing to assume. By calling urself "Jew," Unz, u repudiate humanity.

Unz: face the hard facts, buddy: if u're Jew, u're no friend or even fellow of any gentiles or human beings. Regardless anything else, u're simply a "Trojan Horse," an "ice-breaker," as it were, for fellow Jews who ARE "religious" and Talmudic, even if it were possible u weren't--u can't deny it--not in reason or truth. Entertaining "Colin Wright" is too much of a travesty and joke.


-----------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------------

Colin Wright says: • Website
December 24, 2018 at 7:57 am GMT • 400 Words

Substantially, I agree with most of what you say. The issue is what to do about it.

More or less at random, the following thoughts come to mind.

First, those of us who engage in thought crime of whatever form need an alternative web that is at least more difficult to shut down. As long as we’re at the mercy of mainstream censors, we’ll never get anywhere.

Meantime, the issue is whether to appease or outrage. This always poses a quandary; I see it a lot in my own area of especial concern: Israel. Do you carefully assure everyone you agree Israel has a right to exist, dutifully decry ‘terrorism,’ avoid ever referring to ‘Jews,’ etc — and work yourself into a position of total impotence?

Or do you rage about the disproportionate power, influence, and privilege of Jews, denounce Israel as essentially a Nazi state, argue that any measures against it are justified, and so on — and find yourself off in a corner with twelve other ‘anti-semites’, banned by all?

This is a general problem. To take the path of moderation, and remain ‘legitimate’ at the risk if becoming innocuous — or call a spade a spade at the risk of being completely marginalized?

Finally, which causes? Take Holocaust Denial. I happen to be convinced that the Holocaust happened substantially as advertised, but others aren’t.

Well, speaking for myself, they’re free to argue their case. They can knock themselves out. As far as I’m concerned, it’s like faith in Jesus, or belief in Kennedy assassination plots, or any one of a dozen such convictions I just don’t share. Have at it, though. It’s like golf. Of no interest to me, but don’t let me spoil your fun.

The problem I see is that in plugging Holocaust denial in particular, one immediately marginalizes both oneself and anyone one is associated with. Unz Review can have twelve interesting ideas that might actually gain traction with the casual visitor — but if Holocaust Denial is at the top of the page, he’ll move hastily on.

It’s like Obama birtherism, or 9/11 having all been staged, or any one of several such beliefs. It’s an immediate red flag that triggers a ‘shake your head and move on’ response from most people.

Again, I’m not sure what to do about that. There’s little point in decrying mainstream censorship if we’re just going to muzzle ourselves. On the other hand…

Well, that’s about it for now. Unz’s points are thought-provoking.



115.David Baker says:
December 25, 2018 at 12:02 am GMT • 200 Words
@apollonian

“Holocaust Denial” is an incendiary term that will justify the unleashing of the Jewish SMR (Scalded Monkey Routine) response to such heresy and hatred. Many Jews “Deny the Holocaust”, and even a scintilla of scrutiny applied toward that topic opens up an entire chapter revealing its origins: War Atrocity Propaganda. As the Holocaust Industry slowly dispenses with the most ridiculous elements of that event, such as Human Soap, a leftover from WWI, along with lampshades made from Jewish Skin, Holocaust historians must feverishly revamp their published volumes and lecture content to keep up with the changes. Hilberg, for example, deleted references to his “Hitler Orders to Exterminate the Jews” published in his standard reference work “The Destruction of the European Jews” after confessing his inability to produce those orders during his testimony at the Zundel False News Trial in Canada. What goyim should know is that, during Zundel’s Appeal Trial, NONE of the witnesses, historians or prosecution experts would appear and testify under oath.

(Can you say “Perjury”?…….)

Truly, Holocaust Revisionism is akin to shooting Gefilte fish in a barrel, which is why the Industry has shifted their efforts toward government sanction and protection of that fairy tale.

• Agree: apollonian



anon[199] • Disclaimer says:
December 25, 2018 at 12:11 am GMT
@apollonian

lol, good rant



121.apollonian says:
December 25, 2018 at 12:32 am GMT • 100 Words
@anon

Thanks, buddy–I must be careful how I spell, hoho ho ho. I hope people will tell Unz he’s not being accurate about grammar, or “content-free,” and he’s obviously just setting-up excuse for his censorship–which censorship is precisely what he pretends to be speaking against in this thread, notice? Take care.

Discrimination--ABSOLUTELY essential, regarding Jews....

Below-copied by ap first submitted (but censored/deleted by Jew editor) at comment, http://www.unz.com/ldinh/endless-cul.../#new_comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

No Discrimination?--Very Strange, Very Ominous--Something Is Surely Wrong
(Apollonian, 24 Dec 18)

Vietnamese can also congratulate themselves on proving to the world that 1) They don’t discriminate against minorities

How could u possibly know that ALL Vietnamese don't "discriminate"?--or do u mean the govt. doesn't, thus allowing the individual citizens to do so?

Don't u think satanists and communists should be discriminated against?--if not, why not? On the other hand, one can understand communists might be regarded there in Vietnam as liberators.

Regardless, it is and was the very glory of Western (hence Christian) civilization we used to discriminate very intensively against those satanic Christ-killers, and when we stopped doing so, absolute catastrophe occurred--and continues.

But then again, there grew-up satanists even among the ostensive Christians--which all confused things so much that the Jews were accounted to be harmless--and that's aside fm fact many people objected, even at that time when Jews were "emancipated"--a fatal mistake, that emancipation.

But evidently, in Vietnam there, u folks are so busy, making money, that u don't see any problem for the lack of discrimination.

Finally, I don't think we Americans elected Obama--it had to have been by means of heavy FRAUD that that could ever have occurred. Electronic voting is PROVEN fraud--there's no way to verify such voting ever counts, and then there are all the other frauds that take place regarding elections and voting.

Secession, nullification--they're going to happen, suckers--get ready....

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/pgottfried/the-de...tism/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sovereignty Of States, Right Of Secession Exists--And It's Going To Happen
(Apollonian, 23 Dec 18)

Idiot: don't u realize secession then was precisely the very answer to ur stinking problem, fool? And ur genocidal war was illegal and un-Constitutional TREASON, making war against the states (a), (b) a now legitimate foreign nation which had seceded, in accord w. Dec. of Independence and the secession fm Articles Confederation in 1788.

"Sanctimony"?--it's mere matter of fact: states are sovereign, period, and union NEVER had more than "DELEGATED POWERS" which were duly un-delegated--get the picture? Fugitive slave act was mere device by u idiots up north, no less than south, to compromise and keep south in union.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

What do u imagine the 10 Amendment means?--when it speaks of "powers," does that mean whatever u or judges or "majority" say?--or is it enumerated in the letter of the law, the Constitution itself?--if it wasn't, then what's purpose/use of such Constitution?

And how could secession or nullification have been "prohibited" (which it isn't) when states seceded not only fm Britain, but also the original Articles Confederation? How would states have voted for union if they didn't retain sovereignty and option of secession?--which was explicitly noted by several states. Sovereignty is something that's un-alienable--even if u pretend to giving it up, u can just take it back.

Look fool: what happened was that north understandably objected to Dred Scott decision by which they suspected slavery could be extended to western territories and even the north--which would have threatened the security of free white labor, to which whites naturally objected. But the solution was (and still is) nullification and secession. As I recall, state of Wisconsin actually nullified the Fugitive Slave Act.

Get a clue: Constitution still exists, including sovereignty of states, and including 10th Amendment. Present multi-racial, satanistic, Jew-dominated, Jew-serving empire cannot continue, and whites and Christians must and will secede--it's gonna happen--prepare, sucker.


------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------------

John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan says:Next New Comment
December 23, 2018 at 3:25 am GMT • 100 Words

Dear Gottfried and Southron invaders:

Get off my lawn

https://regtqm.com/product/john-burn...ivil-war-tees/

Stop acting all sanctimonious when you were perfectly fine to use the full power of the federal government to make us otherwise ambivalent (who cares about the damn blacks?) “Yankees” be your slave-catchers.

You burned Chambersburg before we burned Columbia.

Signed

John Burns

Gettysburg, Pennsylvania

People, historians need to re-orientate: WWII was mere piece, part 2, to WWI, onset of Jew World Order (JWO)....

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/gdurocher/alain-soral-marx-s-hitler/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Jew World Order Consistently Rampaging Since 1914
(Apollonian, 22 Dec 18)

Comrade: u're so TOTALLY, utterly deluded regarding overall strategy. Germans NEVER had a chance. Don't forget Germans LOST WWI and were deliberately crippled FOREVER right then and there, confirmed by Versailles Treaty.

Dear unc' Adolf attacked USSR as pure DEFENSIVE, last-gasp measure. "Allies," instigated by Jew S A, attacked and declared war on Germany in 1939, after UK (Brits) made offensive alliance w. Poland in Mar 1939--GET A CLUE. Poland had threatened Germany w. war if Germans didn't let Poland have Danzig--GET A FRICKIN' CLUE.

Everything Germany and Hitler did was in way of a desperate DEFENSE fm the very beginning in 1939--and this defense is HOW u know holohoax was/is such a moronic lie.

And Jew S A Lend-Lease was absolutely crucial and instrumental, part of the plan fm very beginnings, without which such Lend-Lease USSR was doomed.

Thus WWI was for world dictatorship of Jew-dominated Jew S A, UK, and France; the USSR was model and template. WWII then was the clinching moment by which Jew world order was established forcefully, definitively; everything since then has been CONSOLIDATION--they're still at it, even brazenly having announced Agenda-21 and -2030 GENOCIDE (population-reduction).

U need to re-orient ur entire mentality and grasp of world history and events, buddy.


-------------------above by ap in response to below-copied----------------------

Krollchem says:
December 20, 2018 at 10:28 pm GMT • 200 Words
@apollonian

Here is an article that points to Germany being defeated prior to the US entering the war:

“Historian Dr. Jacques Pauwels analyses the evolution of World War II, focusing on the “Battle of Moscow” in December 1941 which preceded the defeat of German troops in Stalingrad in February 1943. According to Dr. Pauwels, the turning point was not Stalingrad but “the Battle of Moscow” and
the Soviet counter-offensive launched in December 1941:

When the Red Army launched its devastating counteroffensive on December 5, Hitler himself realized that he would lose the war. But of course he was not prepared to let the German public know that. The nasty tidings from the front near Moscow were presented to the public as a temporary setback, blamed on the supposedly unexpectedly early arrival of winter and/or on the incompetence or cowardice of certain commanders.

It was only a good year later, after the catastrophic defeat in the Battle of Stalingrad during the winter of 1942-1943, that the German public, and the entire world, would realize that Germany was doomed; this is why even today many historians believe that the tide turned in Stalingrad .”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/70-yea...d-war-ii/28059

Here's another censored apsterian item by Unz, and we see why as Unz wants to shield Jews fm truth and criticism....

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/lets-boy...d-its-friends/

The top essay here, just below, "Smug Ignorance...," was censored by Unz, and it's easy to see why as it so well rebuts the posting by "EliteCommInc.," copied just below, which was reply to my original, copied below

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Smug Ignorance Basis Of Lies, Lying, Treason--Don't Let It Happen To U, Pilgrim
(Apollonian, 22 Dec 18)

Why are u soooo smug, sucker?--don't u realize there's fearful penalty for treason? But then again, go ahead and be smug, the easier it will be to dealing w. u, right? Another thing is u ought to make an effort to grasp plain meanings of English words, buddy. And why give u more ref.s when u can't even grasp and heed the ones u've already been given?

Talmudism/Judaism IS satanism, sucker--get a clue. And u blatantly and brainlessly LIE: "2. Jews have no mandate to persecute Christians...," u lying EVEN after I've given u the references. Talmudism IS persecution of Christians and any gentiles--which Jews do, practice, celebrate and gloat about, and tolerate (and lie about) as in present-day Palestine, just for one instance, having stolen the land and murdered and continuing to murder the people, which u, typically, ignore.

In Gosp. MATT 27:25, after Pilate absolved himself of "blood" of Christ, Jews answered, "...His blood be upon us and our children."

U lie again: "Christ spoke against the pharisees, sadducees, and the leadership, he did not speak against the faith...." Christ explicitly spoke against Jews' "Oral Law Tradition" at Gosp. MARK ch 7 verses 9 and 13. "Oral Law Tradition" is their Talmudic religion, fool.

U say, "[b]ut seeing them as some manner of vermin—– you are welcome to find any such reference...." In Gosp. MATT ch 23, Christ called Jews "vipers" and "serpents" several time, sucker--go ahead and read it for urself.

Ck also, Gosp. JOHN 8:44: "You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out his desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, refusing to uphold the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, because he is a liar and the father of lies."

So we see how ignorant u are, such ignorance the excuse for ur lying, so go ahead and continue being smug as u are--it won't help u.


-------------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------------

EliteCommInc. says:Next New Comment
December 20, 2018 at 11:32 pm GMT • 400 Words
@apollonian

Laughing. I have no idea what you are about.

I am not sure why you call me a liar. I need a reference to respond.

I am not sure why you call me a heretic. I need a reference to respond.

I am sure there are some Jews who engage in witchcraft and may even dabble or embrace some form of Satanic polity/ethos. But how they relates to my position is beyond me. Nor have I a clue what the further references mean. They have absolutely nothing to do with my comment which in shirt form states:

1. There is no mandate from Christ to persecute Jews.

2. Christ spoke against the pharisees, sadducees, and the leadership, he did not speak against the faith, but rather their abuse of the same.

2. Jews have no mandate to persecute christians — they are simply connected via history via Christ.

I don’t have issues with Christ being the truth and the light — your response is lost on me.

Subjectivity is merely the observation that words might have more than one meaning. I am unclear what relevance it has to my comments. In my view – none. As there is nothing subjective about not persecuting other people.

I think you misunderstand the concept of creating truth. There is no question that an individual can have some impact on truth by their word and philosophy. But Nothing in my comments is to that issue.

And this,

“Thus Jews are simply an anti-human, anti-Christ DISEASE, no less than typhus or black plague, culling-out the excess population of gentiles, who/which Jews must be dealt with. Jews dominate and lead all gentile subjectivists/satanists as Jews are most organized, collectivistically, most dedicated, committed, cohesive of subjectivists and satanists.”

there is not a single New Testament sentence that supports this. Nor does it lend support for persecuting Jews at any level. Now while I tend to be far more cautious about any manner carte blanche’ support for Israel based on scripture. There is nothing stated by Christ or the Apostles to persecute Jews. Holding them accountable for behaviors that are unchristian is not persecution. But seeing them as some manner of vermin —– you are welcome to find any such reference by the Apostles or Christ. You won’t – but give it shot.

You want to call them out for illegal, unfair and dangerous banking practices – no issues. But that is not persecution.

And none of your comments is relevant to my position or me. Save that it appears to be an admonition completely opposite of everything the Apostles and Christ expect believers to embrace and practice.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Unz published the above posting by EliteCommInc. which was reply to below, here, by me, which Unz also published. So only one of my responses to EliteCommInc. was published, the other censored--thus making it look like I didn't have anything to say to EliteCommInc.'s response to my first, here, just below.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Who, What Jews Are--Foremost Satanists/Subjectivists, Criminals, Murderers, Etc.
(Apollonian, 20 Dec 18)

U're not "nationalist," u're just a traitor, liar, heretic, all truth be told. Christ = TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), and Jews are foremost satanists and liars, haters of Christ (JOHN 8:44).

Thus Christ is truth, teaching truth, hence establishing the OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality, necessary criterion for truth, against Jew liars and satanists/SUBJECTIVISTS who preach "midrash" (interpretation) of Torah and "Oral Law Tradition" (see Talmudical.BlogSpot.com, RevisionistReview.BlogSpot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo).

New Test. is simply elaboration upon Christ's philosophy and ethics, Christ preaching and affirming original Torah and law of Moses which he holds in NOT to be "interpreted" as by Pharisaic "midrash" and "Oral Law Tradition." Thus Christ spoke against, exposed, and opposed Pharisees who then had Christ killed. But truth can't be killed any more than reality upon which it's based can be killed, thus truth (= Christ) always resurrects.

Subjectivism is philosophy by which reality is mere creation of mentality/consciousness, making subject God, the creator, hence satanism, Jews preaching an extreme subjectivism, to be practiced COLLECTIVISTICALLY by all Jews by means of group-think and intensive collusion. And Jews preach the enslavement of gentiles and extermination of gentiles--just ck their Talmud.

Thus Jews are simply an anti-human, anti-Christ DISEASE, no less than typhus or black plague, culling-out the excess population of gentiles, who/which Jews must be dealt with. Jews dominate and lead all gentile subjectivists/satanists as Jews are most organized, collectivistically, most dedicated, committed, cohesive of subjectivists and satanists.

And Jews' primary weapon/instrument is central-banking (see Mises.org, use their search engine) which is literally legalized counterfeiting by which they buy and own everything and everybody w. only few exceptions. And illegal aliens are enemy invaders, fool; try getting a brain.


-----------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------

EliteCommInc. says:Next New Comment
December 20, 2018 at 8:38 pm GMT • 200 Words
@Miggle

I am aware of this history and it’s relevance to the relationship between Jews and christians is problematic from either view

1. Jews acting out against Christians and

2. Christians acting out against Jews.

There is nothing in the New Testament that justifies the behavior of either. No christian need do anything to Jews because they reject Christ.

And I am unclear what it is that you think a christian could glean from behaviors that the New Testament clearly forbids.

Now I think there might be some salience to the lineage argument. I have no doubt that many Palestinians if they could but trace their lineage — would be Jews more closely aligned to direct descendants.

But regardless of that no christian should be engaged in applauding the destruction of harm to Jews.

I am a hard line nationalist, but that does not require ,y support for tarring and feathering illegal immigrants.

Ho ho ho, this MUST have been a good post as it was censored and deleted by the editor--which I then tried to dispute, but got very little....

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/lets-boy...ends/#comments

AUTHOR'S NOTE: For some reason the original version of this response was censored and deleted, so I'll try again after having taken-out some material.  See comments where I posted the very first, original.

Note 2: actually, the editor decided not to publish at all, but I copied a lot of my queries as to why and wherefore, copied below.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

New Test. Is LITERATURE, First, Containing Philosophy Within
(Apollonian, 19 Dec 18)

Ur problem is ignorance and presumption, eh? (a) Christ was no Jew, Jew defined as follower of Pharisees and Talmud, Jews diff. fm Judeans. Christ was Galilean descended fm Judeans. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo.

(b) Christ wasn't a rabbi or a "magical" rabbi--he was God the Son, according to the story-line--which u can't dis-prove (but this is no diff. fm Homer in which u can't dis-prove Zeus or Apollo were gods, either).

(c) People like u FORGET New Test. IS LITERATURE, TELLING A STORY, a fable--absolutely NO DIFF. fm Homer's Illiad and Oddysey.

(d) Thus the STORY in New Test. contains a basic, core philosophy, Christ preaching existence of TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6, and 8:32), HENCE AN OBJECTIVE, Aristotelian REALITY, necessary criterion for such truth--which is why Jews couldn't kill truth (= Christ), because truth is based on reality--and RESURRECTS--truth always comes back at u. Jews, the ultimate liars and servants of satan (JOHN 8:44), preach a SUBJECTIVE ("midrash") reality in which whatever they say or want, according to rabbis, is what's true, and what gentiles too must BELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEV, ho ho o ho. Christ opposed Pharisees and the other subjectivistics and satanists.

(e) Thus New Test. presents a basic clash/conflict of realities, the Greek Aristotelian vs. the subjectivistic/satanic, Christ defending Mosaic law and Torah against the Pharisees who preached "midrash" and "Oral Law Tradition," later written out fully as Babylonian Talmud about 500 AD.

(f) And the virtue is NOT in beleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevin', as if, like a satanist or Pharisee, whatever is beleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeved is what is considered then true. If u go out and see sun shining, u KNOW it's day-time--no "beleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevin'" necessary

(g) But Christ spoke to the people and in those times people, most of them probably quite illiterate, got their philosophy fm literature and "religion," so Christ spoke in their terms, defending Torah against hereticalist Pharisees and their "midrash" subjectivism and satanism by which what they said was true was supposed to be true and beleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeved--try to getting a clue.

(h) Note it was "Vatican" pedophiles who later made Christianity into the putrid mystic mumbo-jumbo it is so often taken for nowadays by such as u, who fails to grasp literature and literary methods, techniques, functions, and purposes.


-----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------

Anonymous[288] • Disclaimer says:
December 19, 2018 at 4:05 pm GMT • 100 Words
@apollonian

You don’t put too much stock in Jew “Studies,” but you do worship a magical Rabbi who was popular in the Synagogues, the premier place for Jew “Studies.” LOL!

Just another Jew liar? Found one! Go on, do like Jesus says he can do, and toss a mountain into the Pacific with his magical Jew superpowers. Oh right, nobody has magical Jew superpowers like that, thus proving that Jewsus is just another Jew liar.

You’re a dumbass for characterizing Jews as liars—but simultaneously worshiping them. (I might add that Ron Unz is, as you put it, just another Jew liar too, so why are you even here?)


---------------below-copied are the notes I sent to Unz when he refused to publish------------


The editor (Unz or Shamir) censored my above (top) posting and left a msg, following:

apollonian says:
December 19, 2018 at 10:38 pm GMT • 400 Words
@Anonymous

"[Too many totally off-topic religious comments.]"


* * * * * * * * *

So I then responded w. another (3rd) note to effect my posting was PHILOSOPHIC, pertaining to LITERATURE, assessing the philosophy contained therein--why not let the readers decide for themselves? And I wrote further,

"Consider that in fairness editor would have to delete/censor the original addressee, "anonymous," which censorship I wouldn't want done for sake of readers. Early philosophy was always embedded within religion, religion merely more deeply integrated within sentiment, not only intellect. Let the readers decide for themselves."

[above quoted paragraph is closest approximation I could remember]

I then demanded editor publish my 3rd, above-copied, note, and he could then respond and explain why he won't let the readership decide for themselves.

Editor then censored and totally deleted my above, 3rd posting, w. no further comment or explanation. These are truly Jewwy scum and cowards who cannot stand truth and honesty. So I then submitted a 4th note, copied below:

* * * * * * *

"

[Too many totally off-topic religious comments.]

"Editor: ur statement is just ur opinion, is it not? So why is ur opinion better and pre-emptive?--my entry is only 400 words.

"Pls publish this note and respond so readers can evaluate and assess ur reasoning for such censorship. As it is, I wouldn't want "anonymous" to think I wasn't able or willing to rebut his note.

"Why would u want to preserve the statements of "anonymous," but then censor my own?--u're un-fairly giving him the last word, even though I wouldn't want u to delete his as well, which would otherwise only seem to be fair, under ur stated criterion. Are u Unz or Shamir?"


* * * * * * * * * *

Of course, editor then totally deleted my 4th (above) note, and at this pt. I see it's pretty useless reasoning w. this Jewwy, cowardly scum. But, ho ho oho, I yet submitted a 5th effort, copied exactly, below:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"What Is Editor Hiding?

[Too many totally off-topic religious comments.]

"Well thanks to the editor, whoever he is, who's given a cheap victory, such as it is, to my opponent, "anon," above, whom I hope is NOT similarly censored, despite my own opinion being censored.

"Now "anon's" opinion stands for all to read for whatever persuasion it projects while my own humble opinion is censored so that no one can see it for whatever merits it might have. But, like I say, I hope "anon's" posting stays there as it does present a legitimate challenge to my original statements, but which answer by me to such challenge is not allowed--WHY?

"Editor says my statements are "off-topic" and "religious," which I earnestly dispute, when that's merely his opinion, and won't let the readership judge for themselves.

"So I see SOMETHING bothers the editor he's not admitting, for if it really was merely "religious," then I don't think he'd really be worried--my note was only 400 words. Note I insist my statements are not merely "religious"--so why isn't my opinion given to public for the readership's judgment?--why does editor have to pre-empt everyone?--editor gets his say, but I don't get equal chance to rebut, either against "anon" or the editor.

"Editor won't even explain--won't even allow my own arguments regarding that alleged "religion," and why I say it's philosophic and quite relevant--it's only my honest opinion. But something, as I say, bothers the editor, and he's keeping it secret fm everyone, hidden fm analysis/assessment--WHY?"


-------------------------------------

Alas, but editor censored and deleted my (above) 5th attempt too, not answering. I then tried to post on another thread, but my entry wouldn't even show up, so I thought I was banned. But when I ck'd back later, I saw my entry had suddenly showed-up, so maybe I was banned, but then un-banned, who knows?--I gave it all up by then.