Bad as Alex Jones (InfoWars.com) is, he must be used against the other Jews, we promoting in-fighting among kikes....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smedley Butler The Congoids placed in positions of power like a few eviljellicultists serve their masters, who want us crushed completely. Infowars/fat boy doesn't want to talk about who is behind placing savage emotional get Whitey apes that are put in these position's, of course. If we were on line, I would not want that web site address on here, just my opinion. Jones is in the Halvin Turder COINTELPRO department IMO.

Necessary Strategy Must Encourage Top Kike Powers To Fighting One-Another, DON'T FORGET
(Apollonian, 12 May 15)

Yes (to above by "Smedley"), but Jones (InfoWars.com) is USEFUL for some good info on such as GMO foods (poison), vaccines, and other medical topics, also gun-rights.

Jones' analysis actually closely follows the Birchers (TheNewAmerican.com) whose analysis isn't bad, but doesn't go far enough and all the way to kikes.

And of course Jones is putrid Judeo-Christian heretic (see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org)--hard to know if Jones really doesn't know basic stuff about Jew Talmud, how it gloats over having killed Christ, etc.

REMEMBER: we gentiles are COOKED--there's no hope (we can do very little by ourselves)--at this pt. we must depend upon the top (Jew) powers falling-out w. one-another, "left" vs. "right," the "Left" led by such as Obola, hitlery, and now lately, Elizabeth Warren, the Senator fm Mass., vs. the "right" and "neo-cons" who lead the "Judeo-Christian" puke.

The leftists push "climate-change" lies and Agenda-21 GENOCIDE (which Jones and the Birchers expose pretty well)--whereas the "rightists" following Israel are willing to keep the goyim around in order to continue parasitizing. WE MUST ENCOURAGE THESE TOP FACTIONS AMONG KIKES TO CONTINUE THEIR IN-FIGHTING, get a clue.

Alex Jones (InfoWars.com), such a pathetic, total moron--doesn't even take his own analysis seriously: All terrorism is caused by ZOG, et al....

Alex Jones: Fat-Head Redneck Flunky For Jews, ZOG--How And Why I Hate Him So
(Apollonian, 11 May 15)

One of the primary reasons I hate Alex Jones (InfoWars.com) is his idiot, moronic, fat-head, redneck HUBRIS--how, for example, he brags and gloats, like the Jews he works for, that he's example of self-made success in "free-enterprise," the stupid, lying, little bastard, puke, fat-head moron.  No, the dumb piece-of-shit is simply the Jews' flunky, mouth-piece, and apologist (as he proves so often)--THAT and only that is why he's rich and "successful."  And if the lying son-of-a-bitch was ever to tell real truth about kikes, like about their filthy Talmud (see RevisionistReview.blogspot.com for best Talmudic expo, also Come-and-hear.com), for example, not to mention their putrid history, he'd be instantaneously destroyed, raided, swat-teamed, and quite possibly assassinated.


So let me give just a couple of recent examples how the stupid fat-head redneck works for kikes, beginning w. "Jade-helm" "exercise" preliminary for martial law.  Jones now says two contradictory things, (a) that it's NOT martial law, BUT (b) that it's something leading to it.  Well, Jones is right about (b)--it's necessary preliminary, hence integral, necessary part.  SO it is part of the obvious, necessary plot towards martial law.  ZOG really suckered him though, getting him to frantically deny it's martial law.  And he really looks like the dumb-ass moron he really is for all his flailing hemming and hawing about the issue.  But the people in general are hip, so it doesn't really matter too much, I'd say.  Overall, Jones still puts out enough info on the subject to fairly well compensate for any errors he's made.


But the other issue Jones really, seriously falls-down for analysis, and that's the recent false-flag entrapment of the Muslims who tried to shoot-up the "Draw Muhammed" Cartoon contest in Tx. hosted by the kikess, Pam Geller, an obvious provocateur who helped set-up the entire incident.  Jones totally misses this part as he babbles and sputters about Geller's right to free expression, etc.--precisely what ZOG wants, Jones hence helping to push the overall ZOG lies that there are "radical" Islamists to be worried about, the dumb piece-of-shit scum.


For comrades: ALL "TERRORISM" IS CAUSED BY ZOG, CIA, MI6, MOSSAD, Saudi and Paki secret svc, etc.--ALL OF IT, as we know--and Pam Geller is integral part, knowing and willing, and this moron Jones goes along.


Thus our Constitutional rights, not to mention our rule-of-law has been destroyed by this terrorism TOTALLY created by ZOG, and Jones fails to nail this fact especially in this instance, when he should know better.


And note this ALL goes together--the afore-mentioned "terror" incident in Tx. was classic, obvious psy-ops, and it goes PERFECTLY along w. "Jade-helm," and the dumbass red-neck moron, Jones, TOTALLY misses it.  Recent Baltimore riots also were integral part in overall plan too, obviously.
Jones is such a stupid bastard it isn't funny, and he's integral part of the Jew conspiracy, Jones just pretending he's too stupid and "moral" to be able to spot it out, Jones imagining Judaic satanism is compatible w. the real Christianity.  But still, it really looks like such stupid puke as Jones is the best thing we have for (don't choke) "independent media," ho ho ho oh ho hoh oho.

Gays are pathologic subjectivists (and narcissists), hence too easily given to lies, lying, founded upon wishful-thinking....

Gays Are Liars Driven By Wishful Thinking, Not To Mention Miserable Scholars/Reasearchers

(Apollonian, 7 May 15)

There remains just one more significant item, following blogs, this site, of previous two days, regarding banning of me by queers of PopularLiberty.com, this being the afore-mentioned (see blog of 5 May) kiss-off entry (http://popularliberty.com/1131/one-t...opular-liberty, JennyWren replied on Sat, 05/02/2015 - 01:55) of the moderator, namely the particular paragraph:

"So they [gays] shouldn't be allowed to work with kids? And why not? The majority of incidents in the past two decades where kids ran into physical harm or sexual harm from their teachers were instances of straight teachers preying on kids of the opposite gender."

Observe first, the question is not whether there's "majority" of incidents, but the PROPORTION, as gays are far less percentage of the population than the "straights," and second, there's no citation or reference whatsoever for this gross lie in the last quoted sentence, above.

And it's easily researched by simple means of the old search engine by typing-in "homosexual crime rate" (among other possible phrases) where u get lots and lots of neat entries: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils...statistics.htm, whence u find,

"Although homosexuals account for less than two percent of the population. they constitute about a third of child molesters.6 (6. K. Freund and R.I. Watson, "The Proportions of Heterosexual and Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 18 (Spring 1992): 3443, cited in "The Problem of Pedophilia," op. cit. Also, K. Freund and R.I. Watson, "Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality," Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 10 (Fall 1984): 197, cited in NARTH Fact Sheet. ) Further, as noted by the Encino, Calif.-based National Association for research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), "since homosexual pedophiles victimize far more children than do heterosexual pedophiles, it is estimated that approximately 80 percent or pedophile victims are boys who have been molested by adultmales.7 (7. Thomas Schmidt, Straight and Narrow? Compassion and Clarity in the Homosexuality Debate (Downers Grove, IU.: Intervarsity Press), p. 114, cited in "The Problem of Pedophilia, op. cit., p. 2.)"

At http://www.familyresearchinst.org/20...homosexuality/, we find this:

"The top six American male serial killers were all gay:

•Donald Harvey claimed 37 victims in Kentucky;

•John Wayne Gacy raped and killed 33 boys in Chicago, burying them under his house and in his yard;

•Patrick Kearney accounted for 32, cutting his victims into small pieces after sex and leaving them in trash bags along the Los Angeles freeways;

•Bruce Davis molested and killed 27 young men and boys in Illinois;

•A gay sex-murder-torture ring (Corll-Henley-Brooks) sent 27 Texas men and boys to their grave; and

•Juan Corona was convicted of murdering 25 migrant workers (he “made love” with their corpses)."

And

"A study of 518 sexually-tinged mass murders in the U.S. from 1966 to 1983 determined that 350 (68%) of the victims were killed by those who practiced homosexuality and that 19 (44%) of the 43 murderers were bisexuals or homosexuals.2

"Though probably less than a majority of mass murderers are homosexual, given that no more than 3% of the populace is gay, homosexual murderers show up much more frequently than one would expect (even Richard Speck engaged in homosexuality).

"Along with serial murder, there appears to be a connection between homosexuality and murder. Evidence from before the modern gay rights movement is limited. Of 444 homicides in one jurisdiction from 1955-1973, investigators noted 5 clear “sexual motivation” murders. Three of the 5 involved homosexuality and 2 involved heterosexuality.3

"Probing more deeply into the connection between murder and homosexuality, Jim Warren, who worked as a counselor at the Washington State Corrections Center, did the intake interview for almost all the younger murderers (i.e., under age 36) in the state of Washington from 1971-82 (during the growth of the gay rights movement). He was “probably the only one who examined the entirety of each of their case files.” Warren testified that he was struck with how frequently homosexuality turned up in the cases.4

"Starting with a trickle of 2 or 3 murders/year in 1972 until dozens/year by the 1980s, he noted a recurrent pattern: Although the motive listed in the report was often robbery or theft, “about 50% of the time” it was also associated with homosexuality. Typically, a homosexual would meet someone at a bar or park and invite him to his home. Before the morning, an argument would ensue and he or his visitor would be dead.

...."

At http://americansfortruth.com/issues/...mosexual-rape/, we find,

"More evidence that homosexuality and heterosexuality are not “equal,” as so many homosexual activists assert: a Massachusetts study finds people practicing homosexuality and bisexuality are more likely to suffer various health, emotional and other problems, including “sexual assault victimization.” To connect with the leading pro-family group in Massachusetts fighting the homosexual agenda, visit the MassResistance website and blog."

There are NUMEROUS other entries fm the searches done on the various engines, no doubt. Above are enough, I trust, to sufficiently show-up the outright LIES and gross lying done by these pathological gays who live in their subjectivist little worlds.

The conclusion then is borne out quite well that as the "gay" life-style is fundamentally irrational, oriented as it is to crass obsessive sense-gratification for its own sake, naturally gays are likewise prone to criminality, etc.

Snippy metro-sexuals tell us all about how to talk to half-breeds....

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted, but not published, at http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/smart-living/12-things-you-should-never-say-to-a-mixed-race-person/ar-BBjdWMc#page=3

It (above story url) was story on the MSN web-page, and the discussion was on face-book page which I don't want to get involved with, so it wasn't posted.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Being Mixed-Race Is Nothing To Be Proud About--On The Contrary

(Apollonian, 7 May 15)

Well, being mixed-race is like being half-breed and half-caste--lacking in integrity, the victim of psychotic parents.  WHY did the parents betray their respective peoples, mating w. a rival and enemy race?--what is wrong w. mating w. one of one's own race, thus producing in like-ness of one's ancestors?--there's obvious problem of loyalty for the mixed-race offspring, poor victim of parents' dis-loyalty, self-indulgence, and gross irrationality.

Mixing-race is insulting to one's ancestors, obviously, an affront to the race/culture of ancestors--that's what race-mixing is all about--rejection of race/culture of ancestors, breeding up a mixed-race, mongrelized monstrosity, a horrific half-baked COMPROMISE, product of RAPE.  The mixed-race off-spring will un-questionably and obviously feel conflicted for cultural-racial loyalty.  For the human condition is and has always been one primarily of warfare and conflict, problems constantly arising.

A mixed-race is a CONQUERED race--as of the "mestizo" population of Mexico, for example, the men killed, the Indian women having been raped by the Spanish conquerors.  Only metro-sexual fools and air-heads, like the author of this moronic article, for example, would so breezily and brainlessly over-look such obvious racial-cultural COMPROMISE and degradation.

But race-mixing is un-questionably encouraged by Jews, for example, along w. their anti-human and satanic allies among the population--especially homosexuals and air-headed morons known as "metro-sexuals," these "metros" essentially the weak-minded allies of the homosexual narcissists, criminals, psychotics, and perverts.

For never doubt or forget the basic nature of life--WAR, strife, and conflict, and racial loyalty is absolutely essential for culture and individual psychology--why the Jew satanists (a redundancy) encourage race-mixing and perversions like homosexuality--they want to keep the gentiles weak and at odds w. one-another, the better for Jews to dominate over a race of degraded half-breeds.

One must take general note of the mentality of this entire article oriented towards the air-brain and weak-minded "metro-sexual" element of a corrupt middle-class society, degenerate and in such horrific decline as we see in USA and West, in general, the people demoralized by the Jews at the top who've looted the economy and are now fomenting war against the poor Muslims and war among the gentiles themselves as we see presently in Ukraine, unfortunately.

Homosexuals are un-questionably subjectivists, living in their own little world, IGNORING reality....

[See just below blog posting-article, dated 4 May, posted 5 May, to Nystrom (PopularLiberty.com), who censored apster (see also ref.s given), this the latest (probably last) msg on the subject.]


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

-----------below-copied by ap sent 6 May 2015------------

Nystrom Continues To Ignore, Evade--The Incompetent Coward
(Apollonian, 6 May 15)

Well Nystrom:


We see u're determined to ignore reality--U'VE THUS LOST THE DEBATE, buddy--as we've always complained regarding u homosexual psychotics.  Reality to u is subjective, isn't it?


U're simply going to IGNORE, as is ur TYPICAL psychotic wont, our libertarian thesis to effect we, the people, have every right to discriminate against u gays, including taking state action against u, as in way of preventing ur being in army/military, serving as teachers, allowed to adopt children, etc., this all in same way as state takes action against other anti-social elements, like criminals and felons, u gays understood as part of the legitimate, libertarian governmental concern against internal enemies and criminals--as I argued.


But now further, note, specific pt. regards u homosexuals USING libertarianism, quite illegitimately and fraudulently, in way of masking ur homosexual agenda--we saying U'RE NOT NOT NOT A real libertarian--proven by ur inability and refusal to discuss/debate the issue, pretending libertarianism suddenly and obligatorily legitimizes ur homosexual perversions, enabling u gays to intrude upon society and its children.


U cannot stand this SIMPLE discussion/debate, above-noted, and thus u censor and suppress those voices, including libertarian, which pt.-out this simple fact and argument (regarding right of society to discriminate against intrusive, alien, adverse, anti-pathetic, injurious, even psychotic elements, like gays), all the while u fascist, psychotic gays, like urself, spouting ur usual lies and nonsense about "love" of whatever--yes, love of gay psychotics like urself, obviously, the people be damned, according to u.


And u have NOTHING to say about this simple argument as I outline above, FURTHER, u suppressing even the mentioning and notation of the that argument, imagining, like the typical homosexual fascist and psychotic, that u're too good, evidently, to offer any arguments.


Nystrom: u've had ur chance, and all ur other babbling and spouting, like about "love," as u so preposterously put forth, will not cover-up or deflect fm ur true fascist, psychotic nature and motivations in contempt of reason and true libertarianism.

Homosexuals, masquerading as "libertarians"--they're really just fascist, little punks (as u always knew)....

Ho ho ho: below-copied are couple of notes I've sent to the web-master/owner of PopularLiberty.com, a web-site/forum for discussion ostensibly for "libertarians," but actually for homosexuals--which I didn't know when I first signed-up, but found-out soon enough, as one might easily verify.  Below text should be sufficiently self-explanatory, including for references to particular discussion threads (esp. in the note sent on 2 May).


Homosexuals are really just narcissist-fascists, also obsessive-compulsives addicted to sense-gratification, well-enough demonstrated in below-copied notes, I think.  If u want a good laugh, ck out the lead posting, titled "Seven things...," for the thread cited below, by Nystrom.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

[just below sent earlier, on the 4th, May, Monday]

Note my previous msg, sent 2 days ago, copied below--

What's ur problem, Nystrom?

Do u imagine "libertarians" must necessarily tolerate homosexuals?  I note u still haven't replied to my below-copied complaint about ur enforcer, "JennyWren," who obviously didn't consider herself capable of a rational dialectic, so she simply banned someone (me) who was in midst of contending against her thesis--that homosexuals are the very arbiters of the free society.

Isn't this a topic/issue that deserves full exposition?--why was my side of the debate to be cut-off without the fair, rational opportunity for rebuttal?

Don't doubt I intend to bring this fascist repression on part of homosexuals (which is, AGAIN, certainly within ur rights as owner/proprietor to tolerate or not as u prefer--it's still fascist (irrational) action on part of abusive moderator, working according to ur instruction, evidently, even though, again, it's ur right to be so fascist and irrational--the real question/issue is whether the philosophy, and ur policy, is compatible w. libertarianism--it's something to be debated, aside fm any smug declarations u may feel it expedient to spout as part of ur excuse not to so debate/discuss) up for discussion on ur forum--should I be given the opportunity--which opportunity should be considered perfectly fair topic for discussion--why wouldn't it be?  How is it this topic--about legitimacy of homosexuals--would be "off-limits"?  Why would ANYTHING necessarily be "off-limits"?

So (polemic) ball's in ur court, Nystrom--what's the problem?--u gays are simply not going to tolerate criticism, and anyone who questions u will be suppressed?  Interesting how u people struggle over the simple and obvious answer, eh?  Rather indicates U KNOW PERFECTLY WELL, u homosexuals are a serious problem for the legitimacy of "libertarians" for tolerating u people, eh?

U've already LOST the debate, seems to me--question is whether u can salvage anything.

--------------------below-copied sent previously, 2nd May----------------------------------------

Hey Nystrom:

I want to draw ur attn. to my being banned by "JennyWren" (I'm pretty sure), this happening as result of, and in midst of the dialectic on ur "Seven things...," post, http://popularliberty.com/1131/one-things-i-want-do-popular-liberty, this banning coming right after she posted her note at JennyWren replied on Sat, 05/02/2015 - 01:55.

U will observe my own argumentation is perfectly legitimate and rational, I trust.  And I was following the dialectic and about to reply when I found I'd been banned immediately after "JennyWren" had posted her comment, above-noted.  She seems to have determined I was championing statism, and that this conclusion of hers is now warrant for her banning of me.

So I say this banning is un-justified in view of the argument not being over, not being legitimately treated by my opponent, "JennyWren," who has abused her position of moderator.

Spare me ur tiresome protestation of property rights--it's quite well-understood.  Issue is whether u want to vindicate ur presumed principle of reason for the dialectic u indicate u want to promote.  A.

Pelagian heresy is something far too little understood by far too many people....

Quote:

Originally Posted by ytkm Thanks. The 'good' world triumph over 'bad' Germans is the question. ... Is that not the essence of this great hoax? A lifetime of 'bad German' for what? A bet?

WTF?

Pelagian Heresy Is Very Difficult, Intricate, Not Only Theologically, But Philosophically Too--Requires Sufficient Expo For MOST People
(Apollonian, 4 May 15)

(a) First of all, ur manner of such cryptic and abbreviated sentences and text format is barely understandable--TO ANYONE under any circumstances.


(b) But further, and most to the pt., the specific details u talk about are not really directly relative to the Pelagian heresy theme.


I do see ur pt., I think (after pondering), about the details being distantly related, but ask urself--WHO ELSE WOULD GRASP THAT?--u would need to provide explicit exposition on Pelagian heresy. The way u're doing it is u're referring to one subject-matter and then mentioning Pelagian heresy without giving any explanation for the relation or what Pelagianism is in the first place--and ONLY those who were specifically up on Pelagianism would even begin to understanding ur note/msg.


So people are left wondering WTF it is u're even talking about. U invoke Pelagianism as if u're making some kind of pt., but this actual pt. of urs isn't clear to anyone, u just asserting it's Pelagianism as if u've proven anything.


Note Pelagianism is heretical and fallacious, BUT ONLY IF ONE ADOPTS strict Christian principle of original sin and determinist sinfulness of humanity--u don't bother making note of this. Most folks don't even begin to grasping this fine theologic distinction which u so breezily mention and then pass-over.


For remember: if u assume the Jew premise of subjectivism, then Pelagianism is more sensible and legitimate--even if it's rejected by strict Christianity, founded upon objectivity and determinist (philosophic) principle--which 99% of people have greatest difficulty grasping. So u're being presumptuous to pt. of LOSING most people for ur reasoning--who will attempt reading ur cryptic, difficult-to-grasp text and then thinking to themselves, "WTF?!!!!"


Sure, St.s Paul and Augustine note the determinist principle and innate sinful human nature, BUT there's possible confusion in St.s Peter and James (Gospels) who mention "works" as the fruition and manifestation of true Christian virtue.


U need to explain everything out in reasonable detail so that average folks can begin to getting a grasp for what u're trying to say--u leave too much stuff out of the necessary expo, I submit.


Don't forget, at bottom, subjectivism and objectivity are both ASSUMPTIONS (which cannot be proven, merely assumed). Subjectivism is only rejected when one reduces-to-absurd (even then Jews STILL assert it, they insisting upon their absolute freedom of will, not caring they hubristically equate themselves w. God). Even objectivity is difficult as it leads to determinism which seriously stumps most folks who were taught "free" will fm child-hood--they don't immediately realize (I sure didn't when I was young) humans don't have PERFECT "free" will--only God does--ours is limited, we being creatures of will, hence self-interest.


And people are taught fm child-hood about being "good" (hence obedient) is the best way. So average people don't necessarily see anything wrong w. (some) subjectivism--and they don't realize how Jews make use of it for their own satanic purposes (even most Jews don't grasp this)--u gotta explain this in some reasonable detail to begin to making sense for folks.


Ur original posting at the top for this thread totally leaves people in the lurch for any specific pt. u're trying to make. I understand Pelagianism, but I didn't understand what specific pt. u were trying to make. In sum, I think ur mistake is in presuming people know anything much about Pelagianism which u leave totally un-explained.


U must rather make more careful, detailed effort--otherwise just leave off w. such Pelagian subject-matter until u're sure u're going to necessary trouble for people's understanding. U gotta look again at what u've written to ck to see it makes sense FOR OTHER FOLKS, not just urself.


-----------------------------below-copied is the posting referred to in above essay by ap-----------------------------

ytkm Reporter, Commentator   Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 3,632

WW2 -Pelagian heresy spectacular Is there any greater example? ' Romans' vs 'Jews' circa 33AD? 6 mil (sic) jews. 60 million Russians. The German Red Cross in 2005 put the total combined German military and civilian war dead at 7,375,800, including*ethnic Germans*outside of Germany and Austrians. Numbers don't lie. Goy-icide doesn't count Any other better examples of Pelagius' s devastative abilities?