"Good" and "tolerance" pretexts used, once again, for fascist overthrow and criminal extortion, removal of CEO fm position, Jews and queers behind it, as usual....

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.john-friend.net/2014/04/the-consequences-for-opposing-gay.html#comment-form


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"Good" And "Tolerance": Worst Enemy Of Christian Truth, Reason, Justice

(Apollonian, 4 Apr 14)

Yes, absolutely--I agree whole-heartedly w. this blog article--Western Civ. is being now FRONTALLY attacked by the most up-front surrogates for Jew anti-Christs, the queers.

Note this is nothing less than gigantic battle of Christian TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) vs. Jew lies (JOHN 8:44)--thus the battle of objectivity, necessary criterion for TRUTH against Jew lies founded in subjectivism and "good."

HOW then did the queers and Jews achieve this amazing, overwhelming power as we see they're asserting in our very faces?  And comrades u MUST face-up to the tremendous power of US Federal Reserve Bank COUNTERFEIT scam which literally just churns-out that funny-"money," practically at will, by which Jew masterminds now literally buy, own, and control everything and everybody, w. only very, very few exceptions.


So the Fed is the key in practical sense, but what is it that underlies, culturally and psychologically?--it's that Pharisaism and Jew LIE to effect of "good-evil" and perfectly "free" human will, known to Christianity as Pelagian heresy (of St. Augustine).


Worst enemy of TRUTH (Christ) is Pharisaism/moralism and phony "good-evil," never doubt--which small children are infected with so easily, and few ever get over for realizing we're all sinners, incapable of "good," needing God's grace and mercy for salvation.  For only God's will prevails, NEVER human will, humanity tainted irrevocably w. sin (willfulness and hubris).


Thus the purpose of Christ/TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) who "died for our sins," relieving us of necessity of guilt-complex--forget guilt and leave-off w. it, as it does no good.  Heed rather to TRUTH, and forget striving to being "good" which is only appropriate to ignorant children and dogs, "good" always equating, in final analysis w. mere OBEDIENCE--which is what ZOG wants fm all its slaves, never forget.


Thus queers/Jews are determined to bludgeon humanity w. this imperative for "good" and OBEDIENCE to slavery--now in form of "tolerance," as for scummy, degenerate queers.  And is there better, more appropriate cadre to enforce and inflict this sort of obedience and slavery than queers?  Ho ho ho ho ho.


And now we see why queers and allies are always so insistent upon corrupting and programming the children--why/how the Child Protection Svcs are always trying to take the kids fm families--why/how queers are pushing this queer tolerance in the schools, etc., etc.

Queers and Jews--foremost haters of TRUTH, reason, humanity, and especially, Christianity.  Queers and Jews know better than most Christians that Christianity is most successful anti-Semitism that's ever existed--it's the purpose, essence, and meaning of Christianity--anti-Semitism and anti-Lies, Christ standing for TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH, above all/any, hence Christianity championing objective reality, necessary criterion thereto, above all--and against Jew lies and subjectivism always pushed by means of vehicle of "good," hence now "tolerance" of such monsters as queers and Jews.

Constituency number per representative is the problem, NOT necessarily spending limits....

Below-copied essay by ap first published at comments, http://aphilosopher.wordpress.com/2014/04/04/unlimited-campaign-contributions/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Spending Is Indubitably A Problem, But "Limits" Are NOT Genuine Solution--Constituencies Per Office Must Rather Be Reduced

(Apollonian, 4 Apr 14)

I agree w. Mike there's certainly a problem.  How can individuals, real people, be limited for their spending/contributions but not corp.s which we've all come to hate so cordially?--almost as cordially as their owners/controllers, the Jews who just literally print-up all the money, practically, they want or need (through the US Federal Reserve Bank)?  Thus it really does seem these stinking, filthy corp.s have been raised up over real people.

Answer, of course, is there should be no limits on people, hence no limits on corp.s either, for after all if corp.s have rights, people must.  FREEDOM means freedom--one should be able to act and spend as one pleases.

Spending doesn't have to be same as speech--spending is action which action must be free like any other sort of non-violent action by the people, speaking or otherwise.  Spending is necessary part of expression for getting opinions into newspapers, etc.

The real problem is rather in the structure of office--the fewer the number of office-holders, the easier to bribe them--and yes, campaign contributions can be used as form of bribery.  So we simply need a broader, hence greater, number of office-holders, esp. for House of Reps.

US Senators should be elected by the state legislatures as originally intended (up to 1913) in order to reflect best the interests of the states.

US Representatives now have, on average, about 600,000 + constituents--this is too many--making it easier for sheer weight of spending to overcome opponents w. less ability to spend.  Number of constituents must be small enough so that candidates can get around by foot and in-person to speak to people, this in way of off-setting the sheer power of spending money, as for newspaper, TV, and radio ads, for example.

As I recall, the original US Constitution made for about 50,000 constituents per representative--even this made it too easy for sheer masses of money to prevail, I'm afraid.  Problem then would be the huge mass of legislators, but this could be treated, for example, by means of a lottery system on any given day for those enabled to cast votes.

So Mike hits upon a genuine, serious issue, but his analysis only needs a little more clarity for proper solution--spending limits are NOT the solution.  Making the elections relevant and accessible for smaller numbers of constituents per office is the way to go--best off-setting the advantage of greater spending.

John Friend suffers the "Peter Principle" hubris, ho ho ho ho hoo--afraid of obvious criticism....

Ho ho ho hoho--I posted below essay at comments http://www.john-friend.net/2014/04/w...l#comment-form and guess what?--it wasn't published--why?--see below for the conversation which ensued.  What's John Friend's problemo?--is he working for Jews?--or is he just not so bright, at least for today?  It's good example of famous "Peter Principle," rising to level of incompetence, ho ho oho ho

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

There's Better Method Than Isolating Whites, Comrades
(Apollonian, 2 Apr 14)

As I've noted before--this "white man's march" concept is EXTREMELY problematic.

All the info given in the vids (I saw the earlier one, too) seems to be quite right and good, BUT there's the political, psychologic angle which ought to be SERIOUSLY considered.

For it is a HUGE mistake, I suspect and submit, to put spot-light on whites--which is precisely what Jews WANT--seeming then to promote white self-pity and doing this in face of all the other races, these other gentiles already HEAVILY plied w. usual Jew lies about racist whites.

Further, note the very same good results can well and easily be had by simple ref. to CHRISTIANITY--that's all that's needed--this then placing Jews and their top side-kicks, the queers, in the spot-light--THIS IS THE WAY TO GO for real patriots and including white partisans, boosters, and sympathizers.

Isolating whites is HUGE HUGE HUGE HUGE psychologic and political mistake--just what Jews want--and there's no doubt in my mind Jews are behind this "white man's march" effort for reasons I give, above.

I know for a fact, for instance, that LOTS of Jews dream of pretending they're "white"--which they're not, and this "white man's march" is perfect opportunity for these Jew monsters and snakes to infiltrate.

Christianity is the way to go for most effective leadership against ZOG, giving whites all the advantages and more than this other means. Whites gotta THINK THINK THINK.


* * * * * * * * * * * *-----------------------------------------------* * * * * * * *


So I sent following e-mail msg at 11:42 am

Hello: I thought I'd submitted below-copied for comment at ur blog: http://www.john-friend.net/2014/04/white-man-march-20.html#comment-form

Surely, my comment is worthy of consideration

-----------------------------------which was answered by Friend at 11:58 am * * * * * * * * *


I've read similar comments in the past and I frankly don't want to publish it.


-----------------------------------To which I responded, at 12:40 pm * * * * * * *


Well, what are u afraid of, or concerned about--what's the problem?--can't u just come out and say the reason u "don't want to publish"?--so what, u read it before?  U published before about the white-man's march, so why not publish this comment about it?  All u have to do is to answer my notes made in the comment if ur march idea is worth-while, right?


------------------------------------which was answered by Friend at 12:52 pm * * * * * * * *


I'm a very busy person and don't have time to respond to comments all day long. Sorry.


----------------------------------To which I said, at 12:59 pm * * * * * * * * * * * *


John: u DON'T HAVE TO "RESPOND"--just publish the comment--let the people see the criticism and think for themselves--u might be surprised for how many agree w. u, right?


----------------------------NO FURTHER RESPONSE * * * * * * * * * *


So u see folks, the guy, Friend wants to affect and stage-manage the debate/discussion JUST LIKE ALL POWER-HAPPY people, ho ho ho ho ho, Friend not so "power-happy" as he thinks he's hit big-time, having been featured for some recent stories/articles on Mike Rivero's WhatReallyHappened.com.  He's "very busy," did u get that?--ho ho ho ho ho--as if no one else is.  Such is HUBRIS and power-madness

Christianity has serious, substantial philosophy, for which it is literary/allegoric vehicle, indubitably....

---

Below-copied essay first submitted at comments, http://www.john-friend.net/2014/04/t...l#comment-form, this in response to bottom, below-copied

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Christianity Is Aesthetic, Upholding Of Truth & Philosophic Ideal
(Apollonian, 2 Apr 14)

Note there's MUCH more rationalist and even straight-forward understanding of Bible and esp. New Test.--which is that it's literature not essentially diff. fm Homer's Illiad and Oddyssey, and hence that Christ is TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) which Jews hate most of all, Jews making themselves God, worshipping lies and the devil (JOHN 8:44).

Thus Bible, esp. New Test., is genuine literary-aesthetic vehicle of most serious philosophy, Christ assuring mankind there's TRUTH, this demonstrated fm the objective reality, necessary criterion/premise thereto.

Thus note lots and lots and lots of gentiles other than whites absolutely LOVE, worship, and revere this Christian ideal of TRUTH above all, and they also, these non-white gentiles, are HORRIBLY oppressed by Jew monsters, all gentiles heeding to Christian hope and salvation.

So it's big mistake to exclude non-white gentiles fm promise and hope of Christian truth and salvation fm Jew monsters--who would do this?--who's interests are served?


----------------above by ap in response to below-copied----------------

KurtApril 2, 2014 at 7:24 AM

Been listening to the interview of E. Michael Jones. He is a supposed to be an expert on the revolutionary spirit of the Jews. I haven’t read the book but I have done some research on the topic. So Mr. Jones says that to get to the root of the problem one must go to where this revolutionary spirit was birthed. Good, I think we’re onto something here- but no, Jones states that it began when Jesus walked the earth and came as the Jewish messiah but the Jews rejected him. Agh!! No! Wrong! Let me be clear for all those that think that labeling certain Bible students as “Christian Identity Types” makes for quick dismissal of an important truth- Yahsua, aka as Jesus, did NOT come to save his people the Jews because the Jews are NOT his people. The book of John in the New Testament, particularly chapter 8 clearly, unequivocally shows that the Jews are not Jesus’ kin- Jesus calls these Jews offspring of the Devil and says the Devil was a liar from the beginning. What beginning? The beginning of the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, Mr. Jones, came much, much earlier- in the garden when Satan defiled Eve, later when Satan’s offspring Cain killed Abel, and later when Esau forfeited his birthright. It’s all in the book- the book that so many historians dismiss as a fairy tale. Jesus came to atone for his people ISRAEL. The Jews are NOT Israel! The Jews are NOT Israel! OK, so then who is Israel? People will argue and say the proof is not there but if you do honest study you will see, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Israel is the Caucasian people of Europe. Dismiss this if you want, I will not defend it here, the evidence of this fact is freely available all over the internet if you are willing to find and recognize it.

Also, I’m tired of hearing that Christian Identity Types are “wanna be Jews” The fact is the Bible, both Old Testament and New is the history and law of our people, the European Israelites. Jews have stolen our history for the purpose of deceiving the world and their strategy has worked but will not work forever.

Christianity, in order to mean anything of substance, must be anti-semitic, pure and simple....

Below-copied essay by ap first published at comments, http://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2014/0...ories/#respond

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Christian Allegory Parallel With Philosophy--Jews The Satanic Enemy Of God, Truth, And All Humanity
(Apollonian, 2 Apr 14)

Very interesting Tim: I knew there were "Judeo-Christian" synthesizers and suck-alongs for Jews, and I was aware of Jews trying to put onus on Jesuits--who I don't think are entirely innocent--but I wasn't aware of this fellow, Pinto, as u've exposited for us here.

I think a Christian MUST be anti-Jew, no compromising--and this includes Israel, the terror-state, too, Israel trying to drag the world into another war, as usual.

I begin w. philosophy and logic, the objective, Aristotelian reality and determined universe in accord w. strict cause-effect, the Will of God--humans don't have a PERFECTLY "free" will, like God's.

But Jews make themselves out to being co-equal w. God, Jews preaching, in accord w. their filthy Talmud, that the only reason for God's existence is to have created his adored Jews, "apple of [God's] eye," God mere slave and attack-dog for the Jews, whom Jews use as their excuse for murdering gentiles ("God told us to do it").

Thus Jews are ultimate SUBJECTIVISTS--though they pretend and insist upon a collectivistic subjectivism (unlike most gentiles who are subjectivist, who are more "individualistic") which top Jews take advantage of, using the lower-level Jews to doing their dirty-work, willing at any given time to throwing lower-level Jews under proverbial "bus"--and these lower-level Jews (like bolsheviki) merrily going along w. it all, long as they get to rape and torture a few gentiles along the way.

Thus Jews make use of the "good-evil" delusion/fallacy/heresy (Pelagianism--salvation by good works) to inveigle the stupid, over-populated gentiles, "good" the greatest enemy of TRUTH (Christ).

This sort of historic/theologic expo is where u're at ur best, Tim--keep up ur good work, indubitably.

Remember: there's "culture," and then there's the REAL thing, ho ho ho ho

Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://aphilosopher.wordpress.com/2014/04/02/the-curators-of-culture/#comment-35871

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Remember: There's Culture, And Then There's "Culture"

(Apollonian, 2 Apr 14)

Mike: u gotta realize there's "culture" and then there's a real something that's actually CULTURE, right?

And u're integral part, for "culture" requires Pharisaism/moralism thought-control and "edjumacation" which is ur particular stock-in-trade--it keeps the suckers and goons in line, by golly.

But getting back to "culture"--the "in-crowd"--u only have to know how it's ordered, beginning w. the theme "whatever's good for Jews" (or ZOG), this including, again, "good" (Pharisaism).  And note, Jews being foremost criminals, according to their Talmud, the top organization is the US Federal Reserve Bank COUNTERFEIT scam--EVERYTHING else about the "culture," society, and economy must follow for this Fed theme, requiring "good," hence subjectivism, hence Plato, Kant, and Descartes, lately Foucault and Derrida.

So for these folks on the "inside" it really is a matter of word-of-mouth which gets around--things like "global-warming," now "climate-change."  Homosexuals are of topmost importance, of course, after Jews.

And note the "in" "culture" is actually an anti-culture which hates Christianity (of the real sort--"Judeo-Christianity" which supports Israel is tolerated), Aristotle, determinism (as it opposes ur moralism/Pharisaism and perfectly "free" will), individual freedom, limited gov., the US Constitution, science, logic, etc.

So the "in culture" is more science than art--u only have to have the right agent, know the right people, etc.  True culture, which upholds humanity, reason, Christianity, etc., is the only real art--it succeeds despite the active and overt prejudice against it fm the "in-culture," homos, criminals, and Jews.

E. Michael Jones: excellent case-in-pt. for the idiot, muddledness of "patriots," dissidents, "truthers," etc., well demonstrating basis of dis-organization of people against ZOG

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.john-friend.net/2014/04/the-realist-report-dr-e-michael-jones.html#comment-form

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

E. Michael Jones: Does Well Pointing-Up Problems Just For Basic Defintions Of Terms

(Apollonian, 1 Apr 14)

Well John, I listened to the whole int.--good job by u as interviewer, as usual.  But I gotta say: I DON'T LIKE THIS GUY, Jones--and note I read a couple of his works, at least, including "Jewish Rev. Spirit," which I thought was interesting, but missing and lacking for necessary substance.

For one thing, as I've noted to u on previous blog-articles, Jones seems to have serious problem for "usury" and understanding what it really, actually is in essence--IT'S NOT JUST CHARGING INTEREST, which is perfectly honorable undertaking and product of agreement btwn contracting parties.

"Usury," in order to really mean anything in the way it is held in such opprobrium for the ancient writings whence we derive the term, only described, never defined satisfactorily, must have to do w. what we today observe as "central-banking" and fractional-reserve banking--whence "money" is printed-up, also nowadays digitalized, this "money" actually better understood as "fiat-money," COUNTERFEIT substitutes for real commodity money like gold and silver.


This fiat-money can be issued as debt, as it is today by US Federal Reserve, or not--but either way the commercial banks get hold of it and end-up lending it, even at low int. rates.  The PROBLEM then is the inevitable INFLATION of prices which demands the waves of this fiat-money be curtailed, sooner or later, and when this necessary DEFLATION happens the loans, even at the low int. rates, CANNOT BE RE-PAID for the obvious reason of drastically reduced quantity of "money" in circulation available for repayment of the loans.

Jones NEVER BOTHERS to explain or even indicate he understands any of this about the obligatory inflation requiring cold-turkey -type deflation which then bankrupts the poor suckers who contracted the loans--REGARDLESS of the int. rate.  And note--EVEN IF THERE WAS NO INTEREST CHARGED, the loans would fail due to the deflation!!!!!--this is what people (like Bill Still and Ellen Brown) overlook so easily about the fiat-money system.

CHARGING OF INTEREST IS NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT the main problem.  Fiat-money system is doomed regardless of any charging of interest simply for the obligatory inflation problem.

Then Jones talks about "capitalism" (which is actually just FREEDOM and free-market) which he additionally fails to understand or define in any meaningful manner.

Then he says, sucking along w. the "Vatican" (which is NOT same as CHURCH, properly understood), there's something wrong w. anti-semitism--which is totally false, though of course, as always, definitions are necessary.

For I ALWAYS want Jews to understand I'm absolutely anti-semitic as THEY, Jews, understand and define the term--anti-Jew.  And yes, I know all about Arabs being semites too, etc., etc.--and the Christian Identity people (at least some of them) pretend THEY'RE semites, etc., etc.


Then there's the "RACISM" issue--so what's wrong w. racism?--it's just LOYALTY, by definition, as anyone can see by ck-ing the dictionary.

I'm very FRUSTRATED to listen to a muddle-head like Jones.  Indeed, there's the basic issue of WHAT Christianity stands for in first place--TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), above all/any--hence the objective reality, necessary criterion for such truth--AGAINST Jew lies (JOHN 8:44) founded in subjectivism ("what's good for Jews").

So u see, there's serious problems, like w. Jones, among others too, for the superficial understanding and usages of basic terminology which, when left un-defined, only promotes great and serious difficulties for necessary coming-together, alliance, and cooperation of gentiles against these Jew monsters who are continuing to push forward w. their genocidal (ck AGENDA-21) Jew world order.  JONES DOES NOT HELP.  On contrary, Jones just continues and compounds the muddle.

So John, that's why I'd like to urge u to have a radio show whence we can just simply clear-up and clarify the terms I indicate above--because it's necessary, for reasons I give, and the problem is truly serious for grasping and comprehension of basic terms, thoughts, treatment, and concepts.  It would be good to have people calling-in to help us take-on any other problems for definition and usage too, I think.