Below-copied by ap first published at comments,
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015...l#comment-form*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Fetzer: EXPOSED As Pompous, Senile, Ignorant Old
Fool, Nothing More
(Apollonian, 25 Oct 15)
Well, this
dialectic (see below-copied) shows us some interesting things regarding Fetzer
and his understanding of the Jew and satanist captivity of what's left of
gentile, Christian, and Western culture, degenerated so horribly now into such
gross hubris in "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler.
And Jews are
race indubitably if they steadily mate w. one another over numerous generations,
which is what's happened. "Anti-semitism" ought to be understood the way Jews
construe it--ANTI-JEW--works for me.
But surely most of all we're
confronted w. the amazing, abysmal, sheer ignorance of Fetzer regarding Jews and
Judaism, Fetzer making a non-existent and absolutely moronic "distinction" btwn
Tamudic Judaism and Torah Judaism, ho ho ho ho. For Judaism = Talmudism (=
subjectivism and satanism), by definition.
It's true there's slight
problem of equivocation for meaning of word, "Jew," as some of the original
(Roman) writers tended to call all the denizens of Judea, "Jews"--when "Jews"
(esp. nowadays) are properly understood as followers of Pharisees and Talmud,
distinct fm Judeans, "Jews" the followers of Pharisees who were only about 5% or
so (the middle-class) of people of Judea, Judeans, at time of
Christ.
There are no "Torah Jews," though there are a few supposed
descendents of Judeans who reject the Talmud, who call themselves "Karaites,"
but these Karaites so few now as to be utterly insignificant. See also Gosp.
MATT, ch. 15, where Christ identifies and distinguishes Pharisees for their
heresies.
Otherwise, Fetzer just lies when he says he can't figure-out
what's meant regarding his failure to considering all the evidence and info
regarding basic facts of Sandy hoax, including (a) the element of
CENTRAL-BANKING, as I plainly described, (b) as well as the other items
regarding the other, similar, fraudulent psy-ops, including Boston bombing,
Charleston, SC, "shootings," "Eliot Roger shootings," etc.
The senile
old fool (Fetzer) then says he'd be surprised if anyone undertood the diff. btwn
induction and deduction.
So we see Fetzer is so idiotically pompous--and
surely quite SENILE, truth be told--it's pretty useless talking to someone like
him, ho ho ho. But at least we get the truth out, regarding Fetzer's miserably
flawed analysis, and the joke is on those poor people who depend on such as
Fetzer who imagine he's only one who knows anything about science or logic or
reasoning, etc.
-------------------------above by ap in response to
below-copied---------------
David Norton October 25, 2015 at 12:12
AM
Mr. Fetzer: Not to speak for Apsterian but I think in condensed
version, we must do more than strike at the branches, we have to get at the root
of it all. The entire criminal and immoral conspiracy.
I think he thinks
you should be as candid as Brother Nathanael. Let it all hang out.
---------------------------------
James Fetzer October 25, 2015
at 6:48 AM
David, Fair enough! But how am I go get a handle on a series
of assertions for which he offers no arguments? Let me illustrate with two of
his complaints as follow:
3. Thus u're guilty of FAILURE of science and
logic in way of (a) noting ALL the facts and details, and then (b) INDUCTION to
proper conclusion.
As a philosopher of science and professor of logic, I
have published and taught extensively on deductive and inductive reasoning,
especially what is known as
"inference to the best explanation", which I
discuss in the Prologue. What am I supposed to have wrong?
I would be
surprised if apterian could even define the properties that distinguish
inductive from deductive reasoning. Certainly, although he has asserted this
AGAIN AND AGAIN, I have seen nothing to give the least indication he knows what
he is talking about. I am therefore at a loss as to how to respond.
4.
Another gross FAILURE is ur (typical) refusal to consider Judaic Talmud which
explicitly teaches this satanism, (extreme) subjectivism, and literal
criminality, war against humanity (gentiles).
On the contrary, I have
addressed the (important) distinction between Talmidic Judaism and Torah
Judaism, where everything I have learned about the former causes me grave
concerns about anyone who would embrace its doctrines. But that cannot be said
about the latter, where apsterian, so far as I can see, draws no distinctions
between them: they are all JEWS and therefore despicable!
How am I to
countenance such extreme anti-Semitism? I am critical of the policies and
actions of the government of Israel across a wide range of issues, which I
frequently address on "False Flag Weekly News", which is presented every
Thursday from 11-Noon/ET (10-11 AM/CT).
So what am I missing? I seem to
recall apsterian has commented on my interview with David Duke, "IQ, Race and
Politics" on The Real Deal, where the Talmudic/Torah distinction is addressed.
But I am not an anti-Semite and cannot embrace his world view. I have no idea
what more you would have me do. Brother Nathanael does his thing; I do
mine.
-------------------------------------------
James Fetzer
October 25, 2015 at 8:15 AM
David, your comment has led me to appreciate
that apsterian is concerned about the broader historical and cultural context
within which events like Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing take place. I agree
that there is more to be said, where I am doing my best to clarify exactly what
happened and did not happen as a necessary precondition to assigning
responsibility and blame.
I can carry this only so far with regard to
Sandy Hook (the teachers, School Board, CT State Police, Governor, US Attorney
General and the President of the US), 9/11 (Bush, Cheney, the Neo-Cons in the
Department of Defense and the Mossad) and so forth.
The kinds of issues
that remain concern the role of those players within a broader context of
political and financial interests, the forces behind the scene who are pulling
the strings and such. I am doing what I can to carry these issues as far as I
can, where I appreciate what others (such as Preston James and Peter Dale Scott)
are doing with those larger concerns. So I get it and agree that their work is
of enormous importance,
too.
------------------------------------
David Norton October 25,
2015 at 8:58 AM
Mr. Fetzer: I don't think anti-semitism actually exist as
the Jews are not a race but a tribe tied to a religion. I would even gather Duke
would state no difference between Talmudic and Torah Jews as to be able to move
to Israel, one has to be a Jew. Israel checks and traces DNA. Further, perhaps
Duke has spoke of Elaine Kagan, appointed to the USSC only because she is a Jew
as a undistinguished jurist. Jews over-represent their kind in career choices by
2500 percent! There is no anti-semitism.
As far Apsterian, I think he
wordsmiths as some of his meme is hard to follow. However, his global view of
what is going on today is pretty accurate. For example, in your educated
opinion, what is the ultimate goal of promoting gun grabbing legislation?
Thanks for your kind replies.